Cognitive modeling of suspense-inducing structures in narrative films

Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 129-147

  Ohler, Peter ^a   Nieding, Gerhild ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85121658011     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. London: Methuen.
2. Carroll, N. (1984). Toward a theory of film suspense. Persistence of Vision, 1, 65-89.
3. Domer, D. (1974). Die kognitive Organisation beim Problemlosen [Cognitive organization in problem-solving processes]. Bern: Huber.
4. Domer, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F., & Staudel, T. (Eds.). (1983). Lohhausen. Worn Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität [The impact of uncertainty and complexity in problem-solving]. Bern: Huber.
5. Funke, J. (1986). Komplexes Problemlosen. Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven [Complex problemsolving: Overview and perspectives]. Berlin: Springer.
6. Glowalla, U. (1981). Der rote Faden-ein handlungstheoretisches Modell zur Textverarbeitung [The unbroken thread-an action-theoretical model of text processing]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Technical University of Braunschweig.
7. Hussy, W. (1993). Denken und Problemlosen [Thinking and problem-solving]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
8. Iser, W. (1990). Der Akt des Lesens. Theorie asthetischer Wirkung [The act of reading: The theory of aesthetic impact]. Munchen: Fink.
9. Kessler, F. (1994). Attraktion, Spannung, Filmform [Attraction, suspense, filmstructure]. Montage!AV, 2(2), 117-126.
10. Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Minsky, M. A. (1985). A framework for representing knowledge. In R. J. Brachmann & H. J. Levesque (Eds.), Readings in knowledge representation (pp. 245-262). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
12. Moller-NaB, K.-D. (1986). Filmsprache. Fine kritische Theoriegeschichte [The language of film: A critical history of film theory]. Munster: MAkS-Publikationen.
13. Ohler, P. (1994). Kognitive Filmpsychologie. Verarbeitung und mentale Repräsentation narrativer Filme [Cognitive film psychology: Information processing and mental representation of narrative films]. Munster: MAkS-Publikationen.
14. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Press.
15. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of learning in computers and people. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Truffaut, F. (1989). Mr. Hitchcock, wie haben Sie das gemacht? [Mr. Hitchcock, how did you do that?]. Miinchen: Heyne.
17. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
18. Warning, R. (Ed.). (1975). Rezeptionsasthetik [Reception aesthetics]. Miinchen: Fink.
19. Wulff, H. J. (1993). Testsemiotik der Spannung [Text-semiotics of suspense]. Kodikas/Code, 16, 325-352.
20. Wulff, H J. (1994). Spannungsanalyse. Thesen zu einem Forschungsfeld [Analysis of suspense: Theses in a field of research]. Montage!AV, 2(2), 97-100.
21. Wuss, P. (1993a). Filmanalyse und Psychologie. Strukturen des Films im Wahrnehmungsprozefi [Film analysis and psychology: Film as a calculated structured proposal for the perception process]. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
22. Wuss, P. (1993b). Grundformen filmischer Spannung [Basic principles of suspense in film]. Moutage!AV, 2(2), 101-116.