Nanotechnology: Legal aspects

Nanotechnology: Legal Aspects

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-251

  Boucher, Patrick M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856511976     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (58)

1. D. Geis, Dinosaurs and Other Prehistoric Animals, Grosset & Dunlap, New York (1959).
2. M.C. Roco and W.S. Bainbridge, Eds., Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia (2001).
3. M.C. Roco and W.S. Bainbridge, Eds., Nanotechnology: Societal Implications-Maximizing Benefits for Humanity, Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop, December 2-3 (2003).
4. Washington Post, “Nanotech Product Recalled in Germany,” April 6, 2006, p. A02.
5. King, Ross. 2000. Brunelleschi’s Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture. New York: Walker & Company.
6. Shirai, Yasuhiro, Osgood, Andrew J., Zhao, Yuming, Kelly, Kevin F., and Tour, James M. 2005. Directional Control in Thermally Driven Single-Molecule Nanocars. Nano Letters 5: 2330-2334.
7. Morin, Jean-Francois, Shirai, Yasuhiro, and Tour, James M. 2006. En Route to a Motorized Nanocar. Organic Letters 8: 1713-1716.
8. Fiscal Year 2006: A Record-Breaking Year for the USPTO. Press Release by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, December 22, 2006.
9. Robeson, David J., May 2006. Nanotechnology and the USPTO, The Disclosure. National Association of Patent Practitioners.
10. Dobyns, Kenneth W. 1994. The Patent Office Pony: A History of the Early Patent Office. Fredericksburg, VA: Sergeant Kirkland’s Museum and Historical Society.
11. Shapiro, C. 2000. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1:120.
12. Dobyns, Kenneth W. 1994. The Patent Office Pony: A History of the Early Patent Office: Fredericksburg, VA: Sergeant Kirkland’s Museum and Historical Society.
13. New York Post. March 31, 1978.
14. New York Post. March 30, 1978.
15. Jackson (Mississippi) Clarion Ledger. April 1, 1978.
16. Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Connally, 337 Supp. 737 (DDC 1971).
17. Davis, Kenneth C. 1978. Administrative Law Treatise, 2nd ed.: New York: Panel Publishers. 6.8.
18. Weiss, Rick. August 16, 2004. ‘Data Quality’ Law is Nemesis of Regulation. Washington Post, p. A01.
19. Generally Conrad, J. W. Jr. 2002. The Information Quality Act-Antiregulatory Costs of Mythic Proportions? Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy 12, 521-557.
20. Oberdorster, Eva. 2004. Manufactured Nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C60) Induce Oxidative Stress in the Brain of Juvenile Largemouth Bass. Environmental Health Perspectives 112: 1058-1062.
21. Lewis, Paul. June 16, 1992. Mutant Foods Create Risks We Can’t Yet Guess. New York Times.
22. McCormick, Joseph B., and Fisher-Hoch, Susan. 1996. Level 4: Virus Hunters of the CDC. Atlanta: Turner Publishing, see p. 349.
23. Weiss, Rick. November 23, 2006. EPA to Regulate Nanoproducts Sold as Germ-Killing. Washington Post, p. A01.
24. Sadrieh, Nakissa, and Espandiari, Parvaneh. 2006. Nanotechnology and the FDA: What Are the Scientific and Regulatory Considerations for Products Containing Nanomaterials? Nanotechnology Law & Business 3: 339.
25. Serrill, Michael S. September 15, 1986. Moscow Takes a Hostage, Time Magazine.
26. Crocker, Thomas E. 2005. Export Control Pitfalls for Government-Academic Partnerships in Nanotechnology. Nanotechnology Law & Business 2:62-71.
27. The novel The Legend of Bagger Vance By Steven Pressfield (New York:William Morrow, 1995)
28. J. Robert Oppenheimer to Association of Los Alamos Scientists, Robert Oppenheimer: Letters and Recollections, ed. Alice Kimball Smith and Charles Weiner. 1995. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
29. Hijiya, James A. 2000. The Gita of J. Robert Oppenheimer, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 144: 123-167.
30. Kubik, T., Bogunia-Kubik, K., and Sugisaka, M. 2005. Nanotechnology on Duty in Medical Applications. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 6: 17-33.
31. The Actual Facts About the McDonald’s Coffee Case. http:// www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm.
32. Carroll, Stephen J., Hensler, Deborah, Gross, Jennifer, Sloss, Elizabeth M., Schonlau, Matthias, Abrahams, Allan, and Ashwood, J. Scott. 2002. Asbestos Litigation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
33. White, Michelle J. Summer 2003. Resolving the “Elephantine Mass.” Regulation 26(2): 48-54.
34. Howard, C. Vyvyan, and Ikah, December S. K. 2006. Nanotechnology and Nanoparticle Toxicity: A Case for Precaution. In Nanotechnology: Risk, Ethics, and Law, ed. Geoffrey Hunt and Michael Mehta, 154-166. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
35. Hardman, Ron. 2006. A Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors. Environmental Health Perspectives 114: 165-172
36. Dreher, Kevin L. 2004. Health and Environmental Impact of Nanotechnology: Toxicological Assessment of Manufactured Nanoparticles. Toxicological Sciences 77: 3-5.
37. Powell, Maria C., and Kanarek, Marty S. 2006. Nanomaterial Health Effects-Part 1: Background and Current Knowledge. Wisconsin Medical Journal 105: 16-20.
38. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, 59 Cal. 2d 57 (1963).
39. Soule v. General Motors, 8 Cal. 4th 548 (1994).
40. Sherman, Charles Phineas. 1937. Roman Law in the Modern World. 790, p. 347.
41. Das Sarma, Sankar. 2001. Spintronics. American Scientist 89: 516-523
42. Hensler, Deborah R., Dombey-Moore, Bonnie, Gibbens, Beth, Gross, Jennifer, Moller, Erik K., and Pace, Nicholas M. 2000. Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
43. Klement, Alon and Neeman, Zvika. 2004. Incentive Structures for Class Action Lawyers. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 20:102-124.
44. Thompson, Robert B. July 1991. Piercing the Corporate Veil: An Empirical Study. Cornell Law Journal 76: 1036.
45. Bush, Larry M., Abrams, Barry H., Beall, Anne, and Johnson, Caroline C. 2001. Index Case of Fatal Inhalational Anthrax Due to Bioterrorism in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 345:1607-1610.
46. Miziolek, Andrzej W. 2002. AMPTIAC Newsletter 6: 43-48.
47. Cohen, Mark A. 1991. Corporate Crime and Punishment: An Update on Sentencing Practice in the Federal Courts, 1988-1990.
48. Boston University Law Review 71: 247.
49. Generally Parker, Jeffrey S. 1988. Corporate Criminal Penalties in the Era of Federal Sentencing Reform-Increased Exposure Under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Corporate Criminal Liability Reporter 2: 48-57
50. Coffee, John C. Jr. 1981. “No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick”: An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment. Michigan Law Review 79: 386.
51. Generally Bajkowski, Sean, and Thompson, Kimberly R. 1997. Corporate Criminal Liability. American Criminal Law Review 34: 445.
52. Coffee, J. 1999. Corporate criminal liability: An introduction and comparative survey. In Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, ed. by A. Eser, G. Heine, and B. Huber. Freiburg im Breisgau.
53. Eric Drexler’s original ideas are presented in his book, Engines of Creation:The Coming Era of Nanotechnology (New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell, 1986).
54. Baum, Rudy. 2003. Nanotechnology: Drexler and Smalley make the case for and against “molecular assemblers.” Chemical and Engineering News 81: 37-42.
55. Want, Haifang, Gu, Lingrong, Lin, Yi, Lu, Fushen, Meziani, Mohammed J., Luo, Pengju G., Wang, Wei, Cao, Li, and Sun, Ya-Ping. 2006. Unique Aggregation of Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis) Spores by Sugar-Coated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 128: 13364-13365.
56. Saxton, Jim. 2007. Nanotechnology: The Future is Coming Sooner Than You Think. Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress, p. 6.
57. Saxton, Jim. 2007. Nanotechnology: The Future is Coming Sooner Than You Think. Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress, p. 9.
58. Saxton, Jim. 2007. Nanotechnology: The Future is Coming Sooner Than You Think. Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress, p. 13.