Consortium research: A method for researcher-practitioner collaboration in design-oriented is research;Konsortialforschung: Eine Methode für die Zusammenarbeit von Forschung und Praxis in der gestaltungsorientierten Wirtschaftsinformatikforschung

Business and Information Systems Engineering

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 273-285

  Österle, Hubert ^a   Otto, Boris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Consortium research; Design science research; Research method

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856401140     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18670202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11576-010-0238-y     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading
2. A Back G von Krogh E Enkel 2007 The CC model as organizational design striving to combine relevance and rigor Systemic Practice and Action Research 20 1 91 103 10.1007/s11213-006-9052-2
3. RL Baskerville AT Wood-Harper 1996 A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research Journal of Information Technology 11 3 235 246 10.1080/026839696345289
4. I Benbasat R Zmud 1999 Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance MIS Quarterly 23 1 3 16 10.2307/249403
5. S Brinkkemper 1996 Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools Information and Software Technology 38 4 275 280 10.1016/0950-5849(95)01059-9 (Pubitemid 126375333)
6. Bucher T, Riege C, Saat J (2008) Evaluation in der gestaltungsorientierten Wirtschaftsinformatik - Systematisierung nach Erkenntnisziel und Gestaltungsziel. In: Becker J, Krcmar H, Niehaves B (Hrsg) Wissenschaftstheorie und gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik. Arbeitsbericht Nr. 120 des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik. Universität Münster, S 69-86
7. PR Carlile 2002 A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development Organization Science 13 4 442 455 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
8. Cavana RY (2001) Applied business research: qualitative and quantitative methods. Wiley, Milton
9. RM Cyert PS Goodman 1997 Creating effective university-industry alliances: an organizational learning perspective Organizational Dynamics 25 4 45 57 10.1016/S0090-2616(97)90036-X
10. David P, Foray D (1994) Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. DSTI/STP/TIP(94)4, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
11. EC (2008) Information society research and innovation: delivering results with sustained impact (evaluation of the effectiveness of information society research in the 6th framework programme 2003-2006). European Commission, DG Information Society and Media
12. Ethridge D (1995) Research methodology in applied economics: organizing, planning, and conducting economic research. Iowa State University Press, Ames
13. A Følstad 2008 Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks 10 99 131
14. Frank U (2000) Evaluation von Artefakten in der Wirtschaftsinformatikforschung. In: Häntschel I, Heinrich LJ (Hrsg) Evaluation und Evaluationsforschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Oldenbourg, München, S 35-48
15. Frank U (2007) Evaluation of reference models. In: Fettke P, Loos P (Hrsg) Reference modeling for business systems analysis. IGI Publishing, Hershey, S 118-139
16. G Gill A Bhattacherjee 2009 Whom are we informing? Issues and recommendations for MIS research from an informing sciences perspective MIS Quarterly 33 2 217 235
17. S Gregor 2006 The nature of theory in information systems MIS Quarterly 30 3 611 642
18. VDRJ Guide LN van Wassenhove 2007 Dancing with the devil: partnering with industry but publishing in academia Decision Sciences 38 4 531 546
19. Gutzwiller T (1994) Das CC RIM-Referenzmodell für den Entwurf von betrieblichen, transaktionsorientierten Informationssystemen. Physica, Heidelberg
20. Heinrich LJ, Heinzl A, Roithmayr F (2007) Wirtschaftsinformatik: Einführung und Grundlegung. Oldenbourg, München
21. AR Hevner ST March J Park S Ram 2004 Design science in information system research MIS Quarterly 28 1 75 105
22. Heym M (1993) Methoden-Engineering: Spezifikation und Integration von Entwicklungsmethoden für Informationssysteme. Rosch-Buch, Hallstadt
23. T Hinkin BC Holtom M Klag 2007 Collaborative research: developing mutually beneficial relationships between researchers and organizations Organizational Dynamics 36 1 105 118 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.12.005
24. Lange C (2005) Ein Bezugsrahmen zur Beschreibung von Forschungsgegenständen und -methoden in Wirtschaftsinformatik und Information Systems. 1, ICB Research Reports, Institut für Informatik und Wirtschaftsinformatik der Universität Duisburg-Essen
25. Leydesdorff L, Etzkowitz H (2001) The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology 5(4)
26. R Lindgren O Henfridsson U Schultze 2004 Design principles for competence management systems: a synthesis of an action research study MIS Quarterly 28 3 435 472
27. ST March GF Smith 1995 Design and natural science research on information technology Decision Support Systems 15 251 266 10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
28. ST March VC Storey 2008 Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research MIS Quarterly 32 4 725 730
29. ML Markus A Majchrzak L Gasser 2002 A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes MIS Quarterly 26 3 179 212
30. L Mathiassen 2002 Collaborative practice research Information Technology & People 15 4 321 345 10.1108/09593840210453115
31. L Mathiassen PA Nielsen 2008 Engaged scholarship in IS research: the Scandinavian case Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 20 2 3 20
32. Miller DC, Salkind NJ (2002) Handbook of research design and social measurement. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks
33. Morgan DL, Krueger RA (1993) When to use focus groups and why? In: Morgan DL (Hrsg) Successful focus groups. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 3-19
34. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
35. JF Nunamaker M Chen TDM Purdin 1991 Systems development in information systems research Journal of Management Information Systems 7 3 89 106
36. Olle WT (1991) Information systems methodologies. Addison-Wesley, Kent
37. Österle H, Otto B (2009) A method for consortial research. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, Arbeitsbericht Nr. BE HSG/CC CDQ/6
38. Otto B, Österle H (2010a) Practical relevance through consortium research? Findings from an expert interview study. In: 5th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST 2010), St. Gallen, Switzerland
39. Otto B, Österle H (2010b) Relevance through consortium research? A case study. In: 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS 2010), Pretoria
40. K Peffers T Tuunanen MA Rothenberger S Chatterjee 2008 A design science research methodology for information systems research Journal of Management Information Systems 24 3 45 77 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
41. AM Pettigrew 2001 Management research after modernism British Journal of Management 12 Special Issue S61 S70 10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.8
42. S Philbin 2008 Process model for university-industry research collaboration European Journal of Innovation Management 11 4 488 521 10.1108/14601060810911138
43. Ritchey T (2006) General morphological analysis: a general method for non-quantified modeling. http://www.swemorph.com/pdf/gma.pdf. Accessed 2008-07-07
44. M Rosemann I Vessey 2008 Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks MIS Quarterly 32 1 1 22
45. Rossi M, Sein MK (2003) Design research workshop: a proactive research approach. In: Design research workshop within the IRIS26
46. SL Rynes JM Bartunek RL Daft 2001 Across the great divide: knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics Academy of Management Journal 44 2 340 355 10.2307/3069460
47. M Schultz MJ Hatch 2005 Building theory from practice Strategic Organization 3 3 337 348 10.1177/1476127005055795
48. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge
49. K Starkey P Madan 2001 Bridging the relevance gap: aligning stakeholders in the future of management research British Journal of Management 12 S3 S26 10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.2
50. S Thomke E von Hippel 2002 Customers as innovators: a new way to create value Harvard Business Review 80 4 74 81
51. D van Aken 2004 Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules Journal of Management Studies 41 2 219 246 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x (Pubitemid 38284437)
52. van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged scholarship. Oxford University Press, Oxford
53. vom Brocke J (2007) Design principles for reference modeling: reusing information models by means of aggregation, specialisation, instantiation, and analogy. In: Fettke P, Loos P (Hrsg) Reference modeling for business systems analysis. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, S 47-75
54. JG Walls GR Widmeyer OA El Sawy 1992 Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS Information Systems Research 3 1 36 59 10.1287/isre.3.1.36
55. T Wilde T Hess 2007 Forschungsmethoden der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Eine empirische Untersuchung WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 49 4 280 287 10.1007/s11576-007- 0064-z
56. R Winter 2008 Design science research in Europe European Journal of Information Systems 17 5 470 475 10.1057/ejis.2008.44
57. Winter R, Schelp J (2006) Reference modeling and method construction - a design science perspective. In: Liebrock, L.M. (Hrsg) 21st annual ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC2006). ACM Press, Dijon, S 1561-1562