Estimation of time-dependent input from neuronal membrane potential

Neural Computation

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 3070-3093

  Kobayashi, Ryota ^a   Shinomoto, Shigeru ^b   Lansky, Petr ^c  

^a RITSUMEIKAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN CORTEX; CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; LETTER; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; HUMANS; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84856380698     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00205     Document Type: Letter

References (49)

1. Bialek,W., Callan, C. G., & Strong, S. P. (1996). Field theories for learning probability distributions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 4693-4697.
2. Borg-Graham, L. J., Monier, C., & Frégnac, Y. (1998). Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nature, 393, 369-373.
3. Brette, R., Piwkowska, Z., Monier,C., Rudolph-Lilith, M., Fournier, J., Levy,M., et al. (2008). High-resolution intracellular recordings using a real-time computational model of the electrode. Neuron, 59, 379-391.
4. Burkitt, A. N. (2006). A review of the integrate-and-fire neuron model: I. Homogeneous synaptic input. Biol. Cybern., 95, 1-19.
5. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 39, 1-38.
6. Destexhe, A., Mainen, Z., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1998). Kinetic models of synaptic transmission. In C. Koch & I. Segev (Eds. ), Methods in neuronal modeling (pp. 1-26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Destexhe, A., Rudolph, M., & Pare, D. (2003). The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 4, 739-751.
8. DeWeese, M. R.,&Zador, A. M. (2006).Non-gaussian membrane potential dynamics imply sparse, synchronous activity in auditory cortex J. Neurosci., 26, 12206-12218.
9. Diesmann, M., Gewaltig, M. O., & Aertsen, A. (1999). Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks. Nature, 402, 529-533.
10. Eden, U. T., Frank, L. M., Barbieri, R., Solo, V., & Brown, E. N. (2004). Dynamic analyses of neural encoding by point process adaptive filtering. Neural Comput., 16, 971-998.
11. Friston, K. J., Penny, W., Phillips, C., Kiebel, S., Hinton, G., & Ashburner, J. (2002). Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: Theory. NeuroImage, 16, 465-483.
12. Huys, Q.J.M., & Paninski, L. (2009). Smoothing of, and parameter estimation from, noisy biophysical recordings. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000379.
13. Jolivet, R., Kobayashi, R., Rauch, A., Naud, R., Shinomoto, S., & Gerstner,W. (2008). A benchmark test for a quantitative assessment of simple neuron models. J. Neurosci. Methods, 169, 417-424.
14. Jolivet, R., Lewis, T. J., & Gerstner,W. (2004). Generalized integrate-and-fire models of neuronal activity approximate spike trains of a detailedmodel to a high degree of accuracy. J. Neurophysiol., 92, 959-976.
15. Kistler, W., Gerstner, W., & van Hemmen, J. L. (1997). Reduction of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations to a single-variable threshold model. Neural Comput., 9, 1015-1045.
16. Kitagawa, G. (1998). A self-organizing state-space model. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 93, 1203-1215.
17. Kobayashi, R., & Shinomoto, S. (2007). State space method for predicting the spike times of a neuron. Phys. Rev. E, 75, 011925.
18. Kobayashi, R., Tsubo, Y., & Shinomoto, S. (2009). Made-to-order spiking neuron model equipped with a multi-timescale adaptive threshold. Front. Comput. Neurosci., 3, 9.
19. Koyama, S., Chase, S. M., Whitford, A. S., Velliste, M., Schwartz, A. B., & Kass, R. E. (2010). Comparison of brain-computer interface decoding algorithms in open-loop and closed-loop control. J. Comput. Neurosci., 29, 73-87.
20. Koyama, S., Perez-Bolde, L. C., Shalizi, C. R., & Kass, R. E. (2010). Approximate methods for state-space models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 105, 170-180.
21. Koyama, S.,&Shinomoto, S. (2005). Empirical Bayes interpretations of random point events. J. Physics A, 38, L531-L537.
22. Lansky, P. (1983). Inference for the diffusion models of neuronal activity. Math. Biosci., 67, 247-260.
23. Lansky, P. (1984). On approximations of Stein's neuronal model. J. Theor. Biol., 107, 631-647.
24. Lansky, P., & Ditlevsen, S. (2008). A review of the methods for signal estimation in stochastic diffusion leaky integrate-and-fire neuronal models. Biol. Cybern., 99, 253-262.
25. Lansky, P., & Sacerdote, L. (2001). The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck neuronal model with signal-dependent noise. Phys. Lett. A, 285, 132-140.
26. Lansky, P., Sanda, P.,&He, J. (2006). The parameters of the stochastic leaky integrate-and-fire neuronal model. J. Comput. Neurosci., 21, 211-223.
27. Lansky, P., Sanda, P., & He, J. (2010). Effect of stimulation on the input parameters of stochastic leaky integrate-and-fire neuronal model. J. Physiol. (Paris), 104, 160-166.
28. Lindner, B., & Longtin, A. (2006). Comment on "Characterization of subthreshold voltage fluctuations in neuronal membranes," by M. Rudolph and A. Destexhe. Neural Comp., 18, 1896-1931.
29. Monier, C., Fournier, J., & Frégnac, Y. (2008). In vitro and in vivomeasures of evoked excitatory and inhibitory conductance dynamics in sensory cortices. J. Neurosci. Methods, 169, 323-365.
30. Paninski, L., Ahmadian, Y., Ferreira, D.G., Koyama, S., Rad, K. R., Vidne, M., et al. (2010). A new look at state-space models for neural data. J. Comput. Neurosci., 29, 107-126.
31. Pare, D., Shink, E., Gaudreau, H., Destexhe, A., & Lang, E. J. (1998). Impact of spontaneous synaptic activity on the resting properties of cat neocortical neurons in vivo. J. Neurophysiol., 79, 1450-1460.
32. Pham, J., Pakdaman, K., & Vibert, J.-F. (1998). Noise-induced coherent oscillations in randomly connected neural networks. Phys. Rev. E, 58, 3610-3622.
33. Pospischil, M., Piwkowska, Z., Bal, T., & Destexhe, A. (2009). Extracting synaptic conductances from single membrane potential traces. Neuroscience, 158, 545-552.
34. Ricciardi, L. M. (1976). Diffusion approximation for a multi-input model neuron. Biol. Cybern., 24, 237-240.
35. Ricciardi, L. M. (1977). Diffusion processes and related topics in biology. Berlin: Springer.
36. Rudolph, M., & Destexhe, A. (2003). Characterization of subthreshold voltage fluctuations in neuronal membranes. Neural Comput., 15, 2577-2618.
37. Rudolph, M., & Destexhe, A. (2005). An extended analytical expression for the membrane potential distribution of conductance-based synaptic noise. Neural Comput., 17, 2301-2315.
38. Rudolph, M., Piwkowska, Z., Badoual, M., Bal, T., & Destexhe, A. (2004). A method to estimate synaptic conductances from membrane potential fluctuations. J. Neurophysiol., 91, 2884-2896.
39. Rudolph, M., Pospischil, M., Timofeev, I., & Destexhe, A. (2007). Inhibition determines membrane potential dynamics and controls action potential generation in awake and sleeping cat cortex J. Neurosci., 27, 5280-5290.
40. Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1995). Is there a signal in the noise? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 5, 248-250.
41. Shadlen, M. N.,&Newsome,W. T. (1998). The variable discharge of cortical neurons: Implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. J. Neurosci., 18, 3870-3896.
42. Shimokawa, T., & Shinomoto, S. (2009). Estimating instantaneous irregularity of neuronal firing. Neural Comput., 21, 1931-1951.
43. Shinomoto, S., Sakai, Y., & Funahashi, S. (1999). The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process does not reproduce spiking statistics of neurons in prefrontal cortex. Neural Comput., 11, 935-951.
44. Smith, A. C., & Brown, E. N. (2003). Estimating a state-space model from point process observations. Neural Comput., 15, 965-991.
45. Softky,W. R., & Koch, C. (1993). The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J. Neurosci., 13: 334-350.
46. Stein, R. B. (1965).Atheoretical analysis of neuronal variability. Biophys. J., 5, 173-194.
47. Tuckwell, H. C. (1988). Introduction to theoretical neurobiology, vol. 2. Nonlinear and stochastic theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Vilela, R. D., & Lindner, B. (2009). Are the input parameters of white noise driven integrate and fire neurons uniquely determined by rate and CV? J. Theor. Biol., 257, 90-99.
49. Wehr, M., & Zador, A. M. (2003). Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex. Nature, 426, 442-446.