Dynamic Analysis of Neural Encoding by Point Process Adaptive Filtering

Neural Computation

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 971-998

  Eden, Uri T ^a,b   Frank, Loren M ^a   Barbieri, Riccardo ^a   Solo, Victor ^a,c   Brown, Emery N ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADAPTATION; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ALGORITHMS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 1842733199     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089976604773135069     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barbieri, R., Quirk, M. C., Frank, L. M., Wilson, M. A., & Brown, E. N. (2001). Construction and analysis of non-Poisson stimulus response models of neu ral spike train activity. J. Neurosci. Meth., 105, 25-37.
2. Brown, E. N., Barbieri, R., Eden, U. T., & Frank, L. M. (2003). Likelihood meth ods for neural data analysis. In J. Feng (Ed.), Computational neuronscience: A comprehensive approach (pp. 253-286). London: CRC.
3. Brown, E. N., Barbieri, R., Ventura, V., Kass, R. E., & Frank, L. M. (2002). The time-rescaling theorem and its application to neural spike train data analysis. Neural Computation, 14, 325-346.
4. Brown, E. N., Frank, L. M., Tang, D., Quirk, M. C., & Wilson, M.A. (1998). A statis tical paradigm for neural spike train decoding applied to position prediction from ensemble firing patterns of rat hippocampal place cells. J. Neurosci., 18, 7411-7425.
5. Brown, E. N., Nguyen, D. P., Frank, L. M., Wilson, M. A., & Solo, V. (2001). An analysis of neural receptive field plasticity by point process adaptive filtering. PNAS, 98, 12261-12266.
6. Daley, D., & Vere-Jones, D. (1988). An introduction to the theory of point process. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Donoghue, J. P. (1995). Plasticity of sensorimotor representations. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 5, 749-754.
8. Donoghue, J. P. (2002). Connecting cortex to machines: Recent advances in brain interfaces. Nat. Neurosci., 5, 1085-1088.
9. Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., & Gordon, N. (2001). Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. Frank, L. M., Brown, E. N., & Wilson, M. A. (2000). Trajectory encoding in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Neuron, 27, 169-178.
11. Frank, L. M., Eden, U. T., Solo, V., Wilson, M. A., & Brown, E. N. (2002). Con trasting patterns of receptive field plasticity in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex: An adaptive filtering approach. J. Neurosci., 22, 3817-3830.
12. Frank, L. M., Stanley, G. B., & Brown, E. N. (2003). New places and new represen tations: Place field plasticity in the hippocampus and cortex (Program No. 91.18). Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience.
13. Gandalfo, F., Li, C. S. R., Benda, B. J., Schioppa, C. P., & Bizzi, E. (2000). Cortical correlates of learning in monkeys adapting to a new dynamical environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 2259-2263.
14. Haykin, S. (1996). Adaptive filter theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Jog, M. S., Kubota, Y., Connolly, C. I., Hillegaart, V., & Graybiel, A. M. (1999). Building neural representations of habits. Science, 286, 1745-1749.
16. Kaas, J. H., Merzenich, M. M., & Killackey, H. P. (1983). The reorganization of somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve damage in adult and developing mammals. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 6, 325-356.
17. Kitagawa, G., & Gersh, W. (1996). Smoothness priors analysis of time series. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Li, C. S. R., Padoa-Schioppa, C., & Bizzi, E. (2001). Neuronal correlates of motor performance and motor learning in the primary motor cortex of monkeys adapting to an external force field. Neuron, 30, 593-607.
19. Ljung, L., & Soderstrom, T. (1987). Theory and practice of recursive identification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Mehta, M. R., Barnes, C. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1997). Experience-dependent, asymmetric expansion of hippocampal place fields. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 8918-8921.
21. Mehta, M. R., Quirk, M. C., & Wilson, M. A. (2000). Experience-dependent, asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields. Neuron, 25, 707-715.
22. Merzenich, M. M., Nelson, R. J., Stryker, M. P., Cynader, M. S., Schoppmann, A., & Zook, J. M. (1984). Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol., 224, 591-605.
23. Moran, D. W., & Schwartz, A. B. (1999). Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. J. Neurophysiol., 82, 2676-2692.
24. O'Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971). The hippocampus as a spatial map: Pre liminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Res., 34, 171-175.
25. Pettet, N. M. (1992). Dynamic changes in receptive-field size in cat primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 8366-8370.
26. Roweis, S., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). An EM algorithm for identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Available on-line: http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac. uk/publications/papers/index.html.
27. Smith, A. C., & Brown, E. N. (2003). Estimating a state-space model from point process observations. Neural Computation, 15, 965-991.
28. Snyder, D., & Miller, M. (1991). Random point processes in time and space. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. Solo, V., & Kong, X. (1995). Adaptive signal processing algorithms: Stability and performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Weinberger, N. M. (1993). Learning-induced changes of auditory receptive fields. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol, 3, 570-577.
31. Wirth, S., Yanike, M., Frank, L. M., Smith, A. C., Brown, E. N., & Suzuki W. A. (2003). Single neurons in the monkey hippocampus and learning of new associations. Science, 300(5625), 1578-1581.
32. Wu, W., Black, M. J., Gao, Y., Bienenstock, E., Serruya, M., Shaikhouni, A., & Donoghue, J. P. (2002). Neural decoding of cursor motion using a Kalman fil ter. Paper presented at the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference, Vancouver, BC.