Literature reviews

Volta Review

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 353-368

  Rhoades, Ellen A ^a  

^a LSLS Cert AVT ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856371575     PISSN: 00428639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (48)

1. Alderson, P., & Roberts, I. (2000). Should journal publish systematic reviews that find no evidence to guide practice? Examples from injury research. British Medical Journal, 320(7231), 376-377. (Pubitemid 30081685)
2. Airman, D. G. (2002). Poor-quality medical research: What can journals do? Journal of American Medical Association, 287,2765-2767.
3. Aveyard, H. (2010). Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide, 2nd ed. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
4. Baum, A. C., & McMurray-Schwarz, P. (2007). Research 101: Tools for reading and interpreting early childhood research. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(6), 367-370.
5. Berkeljon, A., & Baldwin, S. A. (2009). An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Psychotherapy Research, 29(4-5), 511-518.
6. Brackenbury, T., Burroughs, E., & Hewitt, L. E. (2008). A qualitative examination of current guidelines for evidence-based practice in child language intervention. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 39(1), 78-88.
7. CAHE Review Team. (2008). A systematic review of the literature on early intervention for children with a permanent hearing loss, Volume I. Brisbane, Australia: Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia.
8. Clarke, M. (2007). The Cochrane collaboration and the Cochrane library. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 147, S52-S54.
9. Collins, J. A., & Fauser, C. J. M. (2005). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human Reproduction Update, 11(2), 103-104. (Pubitemid 40439504)
10. Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2003). Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(8), 3423-3431. (Pubitemid 36531984)
11. De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2008). When the evidence says, "Yes, no, and maybe so": Attending to and interpreting inconsistent findings among evidence-based interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 47-51.
12. Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111-124.
13. Dunst, C. J. (2009). Implications of evidence-based practices for personnel preparation development in early childhood intervention. Infants & Young Children, 22(1), 44-53.
14. Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (2009). Using research evidence to inform and evaluate early childhood intervention practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(1), 40-52.
15. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Cutspec, P. A. (2002). Toward an operational definition of evidence-based practices. Centerscope, 2(1), 1-10.
16. Erber, N. P. & Hirsh, I. (1978). Auditory training. In H. Davis and S. R. Silverman (Eds.) Hearing and Deafness (pp. 358-361). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17. Evans, D., & Kowanko, I. (2000). Literature reviews: Evolution of a research methodology. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(2), 33-38.
18. Grady, D., & Hearst, N. (2007). Utilizing databases. In S. B. Hulley, S. R. Cummings, W. S. Brown, D. Grady, & T. B. Newman (Eds.), Designing clinical research, 3rd edition (pp. 207-224). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.
19. Hayes, R. A. (2005). Build your own best practice protocols. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
20. Hemingway, P., & Brereton, N. (2009). What is a systematic review? Retrieved November 30, 2010, from www.whatisseries.co.uk.
21. Humphrey, S. E. (2011). What does a great meta-analysis look like? Organizational Psychology Review, 2(2), 99-103.
22. Johnson, C. J. (2006). Getting started in evidence-based practice for childhood speech-language disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(1), 20-35.
23. Jones, K. (2004). Mission drift in qualitative research, or moving toward a systematic review of qualitative studies, moving back to a more systematic narrative review. The Qualitative Report, 9(1), 95-112.
24. Larson, D. B., Pastro, L. E., Lyons, J. S., & Anthony, E. (1992). The systematic review: An innovative approach to reviewing research. Washington, DC: Office of Disability, Aging and Long-term Care Policy; Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
25. LeCompte, M. D., Klinger, J. K., Campbell, S. A., & Menke, D. W. (2003). Editor's introduction. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 123-124.
26. Lucas, S. M., & Cutspec, P. A. (2005). The role and process of literature searching in the preparation of a research synthesis. Centerscope, 3(3), 1-26.
27. Marschark, M., Spencer, P. E., Adams, J., & Sapere, P. (2011). Evidence-based practice in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing children: teaching to their cognitive strengths and needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26,3-16.
28. McGauran, N., Wieseler, B., Kreis, J., Schüler, Y-B., Kölsch, H., & Kaiser, T. (2010). Reporting bias in medical research-a narrative review. Trials, 22(37), 1-15.
29. Moore, T. (2008). Early childhood intervention: Core knowledge and skills. CCCH Working Paper 3 (November 2008). Parkville, Victoria, UK: Centre for Community Child Health.
30. Mudry, A. (2008). Never trust secondary references: Examples from the early history of myringotomy and grommets. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 72,1651-1656.
31. Neely, J. G., Magit, A. E., Rich, J. T., Voelker, C. C. J., Wang, E. W., Paniello, R. C., et al. (2010). A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 142, 6-14.
32. Nelken, I. (2008). Processing of complex sounds in the auditory system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18,1-5.
33. Obleser, J. & Eisner, F. (2008). Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(1), 14-19.
34. Odom, S. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(1), 53-61.
35. Paradis, M. (2006). More belles infidèles - or why do so many bilingual studies speak with forked tongue? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19,195-208.
36. Petersen, D. B. (2011). A systematic review of narrative-based language intervention with children who have language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32(4), 207-220.
37. Randolph, J. J. (2009). A guide to writing the literature dissertation review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13), 1-13.
38. Rhoades, E. A. (2010). Evidence-based auditory-verbal practice. In E. A. Rhoades & J. Duncan (Eds.), Auditory-verbal practice: Toward a family-centered approach (pp. 23-52). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
39. Roberts, M. Y., & Kaiser, A. P. (2011). The effectiveness of parentimplemented language interventions: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20,180-199.
40. Rumrill, P. D., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (2001). Using narrative literature reviews to build a scientific knowledge base. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation, 26(2), 165-170. (Pubitemid 32515131)
41. Schirmer, B. R. & Williams, C. (2008). Evidence-based practices are not reformulated best practices. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 29(3), 166-168.
42. Shank, G. & Villella, O. (2004). Building on new foundations: Core principles and new directions for qualitative research. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(1), 46-55. (Pubitemid 41399355)
43. Shojania, K. G., & Bero, L. A. (2001). Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: An efficient MEDLINE search strategy. Effective Clinical Practice, 4(4), 157-162.
44. Sulouff, P., Bell, S., Briden, J., Frontz, S., & Marshall, A. (2005). Learning about grey literature by interviewing subject librarians: A study at the University of Rochester. College and Research Libraries News, 66, 510-515. (Pubitemid 41095654)
45. Sun, S., Pan, W., & Wang, L. L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 202(4), 989-1004.
46. Vetter, N. (2003). What is a clinical review? Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 13,103-105.
47. Werner, L. A. (2007). Issues in human auditory development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40,275-283.
48. Zwarenstein, M. (2009). What kind of randomized trials do we need? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(10), 998-1000.