A guide to writing the dissertation literature review

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 14, Issue 13, 2009, Pages

  Randolph, Justus J ^a,b  

^a WALDEN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Finlandia University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893588497     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alton-Lee, A. (1998). A troubleshooter's checklist for prospective authors derived from reviewers' critical feedback. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 887-890.
2. American Education Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33-40.
3. Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2004, April). The quality of dissertation literature reviews: A missing link in research preparation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
4. Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.
5. Cooper, H. M., (1984). The integrative research review: A systematic approach. Applied social research methods series (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6. Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge synthesis: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1, 104-126.
7. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994a). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage.
8. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994b). Research synthesis as a scientific enterprise. In H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 3-14). New York: Sage.
9. Educational Resources Information Center. (1982). ERIC processing manual (Section 5: Cataloging). Washington, DC.
10. Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London: Sage.
11. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Education research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
12. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Grant, C. A., & Graue, E. (1999) (Re)Viewing a review: A case history of the "Review of Educational Research." Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 384-396.
14. LeCompte, M. D., Klinger, J. K., Campbell S. A., & Menke, D. W. (2003). Editor's introduction. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 123-124.
15. Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research methods series (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). "It's a PhD, not a Nobel Prize": How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369-386.
19. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D., (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Ogawa, R. T. & Malen, B. (1991). Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literature: Applying the exploratory case method. Review of Educational Research, 61, 265-286.
22. Randolph, J. J. (2007a). Computer science education research at the crossroads: A methodological review of computer science education research: 2000-2005. (Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, 2007). Retrieved March 1, 2009, from http://www.archive.org/details/randolph_dissertation
23. Randolph, J. J. (2007b). Meta-analysis of the effects of response cards on student achievement, participation, and intervals of off-task behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(2), 113-128.
24. Randolph, J. J. (2007c). Multidisciplinary methods in educational technology research and development. Hämeenlinna, Finland: HAMK Press. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://justus.randolph.name/methods
25. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Rev. ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analysis and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5-11.