Geographic isolation trumps coevolution as a driver of yucca and yucca moth diversification

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 898-906

  Althoff, David M ^a   Segraves, Kari A ^a   Smith, Christopher I ^b   Leebens Mack, James ^c   Pellmyr, Olle ^d  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Co speciation; Mutualism; Pollination; Prodoxus; Tegeticula

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; MOTH; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SYMBIOSIS; YUCCA;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; MOTHS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SYMBIOSIS; YUCCA;

LEPIDOPTERA; PRODOXIDAE; PRODOXUS; TEGETICULA; YUCCA;

EID: 84856269298     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.11.024     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Addicott J.F. Cheaters in yucca/moth mutualism. Nature 1996, 380:114-115.
2. Althoff D.M., Groman J.D., Segraves K.A., Pellmyr O. Phylogeographic structure of the bogus yucca moth Prodoxus quinquepunctellus: comparisons with coexisting pollinator moths. Mol. Evol. Phylogenet. 2001, 21:117-127.
3. Althoff D.M., Segraves K.A., Sparks J.P. Characterizing the interaction between the bogus yucca moths and yuccas: do bogus yucca moths impact yucca reproductive success?. Oecologia 2004, 140:321-327.
4. Althoff D.M., Segraves K.A., Leebens-Mack J., Pellmyr O. Patterns of speciation in the yucca moths: parallel species radiations within the Tegeticula yuccasella species complex. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:398-410.
5. Axelrod R., Hamilton W. The evolution of cooperation. Science 1981, 211:1390-1396.
6. Berlocher S.H. Can sympatric speciation via host or habitat shift be proven from phylogenetic and biogeographic evidence?. Endless Forms, Species, Speciation 1998, 99-113. Oxford University Press, New York. D.H. Howard, S.H. Berlocher (Eds.).
7. Bronstein J.L. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9:214-217.
8. Bronstein J.L. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4:277-287.
9. Bronstein J.L., Ziv Y. Costs of two non-mutualistic species in a yucca/yucca moth mutualism. Oecologia 1997, 112:379-385.
10. Brooks D.R., McLennan D.A. Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior 1991, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. Bull J.J., Rice W.R. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of co-operation. J. Theor. Biol. 1991, 149:63-74.
12. Clary, K.H. 1997. Phylogeny, character evolution, and biogeography of Yucca L. (Agavaceae) as inferred from plant morphology and sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
13. Conow C., Fielder D., Ovadia Y., Libeskind-Hadas R. Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 2010, 5:16-25.
14. Cook J.M., Segar S.T. Speciation in fig wasps. Ecol. Entomol. 2010, 35:54-66.
15. Davis D.R. A revision of the moths of the subfamily Prodoxinae (Lepidoptera: Incurvariidae). US Nat. Hist. Mus. Bull. 1967, 255:1-170.
16. Doebeli M., Knowlton N. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95:8676-8680.
17. Edwards D.P., Ansell F.A., Woodcock P., Fayle T.M., Chey V.K., Hamer K.C. Can failure to punish promote cheating in mutualism?. Oikos 2010, 119:45-52.
18. Ehrlich P.R., Raven P.H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 1964, 18:586-608.
19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
20. Godsoe W.K., Yoder J.B., Smith C.I., Pellmyr O. Coevolution and divergence in the joshua tree/yucca moth mutualism. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:816-823.
21. Good-Avila S.V., Souza V., Gaut B.S., Eguiarte L.E. Timing and rate of speciation in Agave (Agavaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:9124-9129.
22. Graham A. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of North American vegetation 1999, Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Groman J.D., Pellmyr O. Rapid evolution and specialization following host colonization in a yucca moth. J. Evol. Biol. 2000, 13:223-236.
24. Hafner M.S., Page R.D.M. Molecular phylogenies and cospeciation: Gophers and lice as a model system. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 1995, 349:77-83.
25. Herre E.A., Knowlton N., Mueller U., Rehner S. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:49-53.
26. Herre E.A., Jandér K.C., Machado C.A. Evolutionary ecology of figs and their associates: recent progress and outstanding puzzles. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Sys. 2008, 39:439-458.
27. Holland J.N., DeAngelis D.L., Bronstein J.L. Population dynamics and mutualism: functional responses of benefits and costs. Am. Nat. 2002, 159:231-244.
28. Huelsenbeck J.P., Rannala B., Larget B. A statistical perspective for reconstructing the history of host-parasite associations. Tangled Trees: Phylogenies, Cospeciation, and Coevolution 2002, 93-119. Chicago University Press, Chicago. R.D.M. Page (Ed.).
29. Hughes J., Kennedy M., Johnson K.P., Palma R.L., Page R.D.M. Multiple cophylogenetic analyses reveal frequent cospeciation between pelecaniform birds and Pectinopygus lice. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:232-251.
30. Jackson A.P. Cophylogeny of the Ficus microcosm. Biol. Rev. 2004, 79:751-768.
31. Jackson A.P., Machado C.A., Robbins N., Herre E.A. Multi-locus phylogenetic analysis of neotropical figs does not support cospeciation with the pollinators: the importance of systematic scale in fig/wasp cophylogenetic studies. Symbiosis 2008, 45:57-72.
32. Jandér K.C., Herre E.A. Host sanctions and pollinator cheating in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism. PR Soc. Lond. B Biol. 2010, 277:1481-1488.
33. Johnson S.D. The pollination niche and its role in the diversification and maintenance of the southern African flora. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Series B 2010, 365:499-516.
34. Jousselin E., van Noort S., Berry V., Rasplus J.Y., Rønsted N., Erasmus J.C., Greeff J.M. One fig to bind them all: host conservatism in a fig wasp community unraveled by cospeciation analyses among pollinating and nonpollinating fig wasps. Evolution 2008, 62:1777-1797.
35. Jousselin E., van Noort S., Rasplus J.Y., Greeff J.M. Patterns of diversification of Afrotropical Otiteselline fig wasps: phylogenetic study reveals a double radiation across host figs and conservatism of host association. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:253-266.
36. Kato M., Takimura A., Kawakita A. An obligate pollination mutualism and reciprocal diversification in the tree genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:5264-5267.
37. Kawakita A., Takimura A., Terachi T., Sota T., Kato M. Cospeciation analysis of an obligate pollination mutualism: have Glochidion trees (Euphorbiaceae) and Epicephala moths (Gracillariidae) diversified in parallel?. Evolution 2004, 58:2201-2214.
38. Kawakita A., Kato M. Assessment of the diversity and species specificity of the mutualistic association between Epicephala moths and Glochidion trees. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:3567-3582.
39. Kawakita A., Kato M. Repeated independent evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the Phyllantheae-Epicephala association. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. 2009, 276:417-426.
40. Kelley S.T., Farrell B.D. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae). Evolution 1998, 52:1731-1743.
41. Leebens-Mack J., Pellmyr O. Patterns of genetic structure among populations of an oligophagous pollinating yucca moth (Tegeticula yuccasella). J. Heredity 2004, 95:127-135.
42. Legendre P., Desdevises Y., Bazin E. A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:217-234.
43. Losos J.B., Glor R.E. Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:220-227.
44. Machado C.A., Robbins N., Gilbert M.P.T., Herre E.A. A critical review of host-specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig-wasp mutualism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:6558-6565.
45. Marussich W.A., Machado C.A. Host-specificity and coevolution among pollinating and nonpollinating New World fig wasps. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1925-1946.
46. Mayr E. Systematics and the Origin of Species 1942, Columbia University Press, New York.
47. McKelvey S.D. Yuccas of the Southwestern United States, parts 1+2 1947, Arnold Arboretum, Jamaica Plain, 1938.
48. Minin V., Abdo Z., Joyce P., Sullivan J. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52:674-683.
49. Morrone J.J. Evolutionary Biogeography 2009, Columbia University Press, New York.
50. Mueller U.G., Schultz T.R., Currie C.R., Adams R.M.M., Malloch D. The origin of the attine ant-fungus mutualism. Q. Rev. Biol. 2001, 76:169-197.
51. Murray M. Figs (Ficus spp.) and fig wasps (Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae): hypotheses for an ancient symbiosis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1985, 26:69-81.
52. Percy D.M., Page R.D.M., Cronk Q.C.B. Plant-insect interactions: double-dating associated insect and plant lineages reveals asynchronous radiations. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:120-127.
53. Pellmyr O. A systematic revision of the yucca moths in the Tegeticula yuccasella complex north of Mexico. Syst. Entomol. 1999, 24:243-271.
54. Pellmyr O. Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: A review. Ann. Mol. Bot. Gard. 2003, 90:35-55.
55. Pellmyr O., Leebens-Mack J., Huth C.J. Non-mutualistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences. Nature 1996, 380:155-156.
56. Pellmyr O., Leebens-Mack J. Forty million years of mutualism: Evidence for Eocene origin of the yucca-yucca moth association. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96:9178-9183.
57. Pellmyr O., Leebens-Mack J. Adaptive radiation in yucca moths and the reversal of mutualism. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:S62-S76.
58. Pellmyr O., Segraves K.A. Pollinator divergence within an obligate mutualism: Two yucca moth species (Lepidoptera; Prodoxidae: Tegeticula) on the Joshua Tree (Yucca brevifolia; Agavaceae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2003, 96:716-722.
59. Pellmyr O., Balcázar-Lara M., Althoff D.M., Segraves K.A., Leebens-Mack J. Phylogeny and life history evolution of Prodoxus yucca moths (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae). Syst. Entomol. 2006, 31:1-20.
60. Pellmyr O., Segraves K.A., Althoff D.M., Balcázar-Lara M., Leebens-Mack J. The phylogeny of yuccas. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 43:493-501.
61. Pellmyr O., Balcázar -Lara M., Segraves K.A., Althoff D.M., Littlefield R.J. Phylogeny of the pollinating yucca moths, with revision of Mexican species (Tegeticula and Parategeticula; Lepidoptera, Prodoxidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 152:297-314.
62. Pellmyr O., Yoder J.B., Godsoe W.K. Prodoxus praedictus, Sp.n., a new bogus yucca moth from southern California. J. Lepid. Soc. 2009, 63:137-140.
63. Powell J.A. Biological interrelationships of moths and Yucca schottii. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 1984, 100:1-93.
64. Ricklefs R.E. The Economy of Nature 2010, W.H. Freeman Publishing, New York, NY.
65. Riley C.A. The yucca moth and yucca pollination. Ann. Mol. Bot. Gard. 1892, 3:99-159.
66. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes version 3.0: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
67. Rønsted N., Weiblen G.D., Cook J.M., Salamin N., Machado C.A., Savolainen V. 60 million years of co-divergence in the fig-wasp symbiosis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 2005, 272:2593-2599.
68. Rose M.R., Mueller L.D. Evolution and Ecology of the Organism 2006, Pearson/Prentice Hall Publishing, New Jersy, USA.
69. Sachs J.L., Simms E.L. Instability of mutualisms: pathways to mutualism breakdown. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:585-592.
70. Segraves K.A. Branching out with coevolutionary trees. Evolution: Education and Outreach 2010, 3:62-70.
71. Segraves K.A., Althoff D.M., Pellmyr O. The evolutionary ecology of cheating: does preadaptation facilitate the evolution of a cheater yucca moth?. Ecol. Entomol. 2008, 33:765-770.
72. Smith C.I., Pellmyr O., Althoff D.M., Balcázar-Lara M., Leebens-Mack J., Segraves K.A. Pattern and timing of diversification in Yucca (Agavaceae): specialized pollination does not escalate rates of diversification. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 2008, 275:249-258.
73. Smith C.I., Godsoe W.K.W., Tank S., Yoder J.B., Pellmyr O. Distinguishing coevolution from covicariance in an obligate pollination mutualism: asynchronous divergence in joshua tree and its pollinators. Evolution 2008, 62:2676-2687.
74. Smith C.I., Drummond C.S., Godsoe W.K.W., Yoder J.B., Pellmyr O. Host specificity and reproductive success of yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae) mirror patterns of gene flow between host plant varieties of the Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia: Agavaceae). Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:5218-5229.
75. Svensson G.P., Althoff D.M., Pellmyr O. Replicated host-race formation in bogus yucca moths: genetic and ecological divergence of Prodoxus quinquipunctellus on yucca hosts. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2005, 7:1139-1151.
76. Thompson J.N., Pellmyr O. Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: constraints on specialization. Ecology 1992, 73:1780-1791.
77. Thompson J.N. The Coevolutionary Process 1994, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
78. Thompson J.N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution 2005, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
79. Tripp E.A., Manos P.S. Is floral specialization an evolutionary dead-end? Pollination system transitions in Ruellia (Acanthaceae). Evolution 2008, 62:1712-1737.
80. Trivers R. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 1971, 46:35-57.
81. Weiblen G.D., Yu D., West S. Pollination and parasitism in functionally dioecious figs. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 2001, 268:651-659.
82. Weiblen G.D., Bush G.L. Speciation in fig pollinators and parasites. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:1573-1578.
83. West S.A., Kiers E.T., Simms E.L., Denison R.F. Sanctions and mutualism stability: Why do rhizobia fix nitrogen?. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 2002, 269:685-694.