Patterns of Genetic Structure among Populations of an Oligophagous Pollinating Yucca Moth (Tegeticula yuccasella)

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 127-135

  Leebens Mack, Jim ^a   Pellmyr, O ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE;

ARTICLE; COEVOLUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HAPLOTYPE; HOST RANGE; INSECT GENETICS; MITOCHONDRION; MOTH; NONHUMAN; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYMBIOSIS; TEGETICULA YUCCASELLA;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHY; HAPLOTYPES; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MOTHS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SYMBIOSIS; UNITED STATES; VARIATION (GENETICS); YUCCA;

INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; PRODOXIDAE; TEGETICULA; TEGETICULA YUCCASELLA; YUCCA; YUCCA FILAMENTOSA;

EID: 1942476072     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esh025     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Althoff DM, Groman JD, Segraves KA, and Pellmyr O, 2001. Phylogeographic structure in the bogus yucca moth Prodoxus quinquepunctellus (Prodoxidae): comparisons with coexisting pollinator yucca moths. Mol Phylogenet Evol 21:17-127.
2. Althoff DM and Pellmyr O, 2002. Estimating genetic structure in a bogus yucca moth: a sequential approach to phylogeography. Evolution 56:1632-1643.
3. Becerra JX, 1997. Insects on plants: macroevolutionary chemical trends in host use. Science 276:253-256.
4. Berlocher SH and Feder JL, 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy. Annu Rev Entomol 47:773-815.
5. Bush GL, 1969. Sympatric host race formation and speciation in the frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23:237-251.
6. Clary DO and Wolstenholme DR, 1985. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yukuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. J Mol Evol 22:252-271.
7. Clement M, Posada D, and Crandall KA, 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657-1660.
8. Ehrlich PR and Raven PH, 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study of coevolution. Evolution 18:586-608.
9. Excoffier LP, Smouse PE, and Quattro JM, 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479-491.
10. Ferrell BD, 1998. Inordinate fondness explained: why are there so many beetles. Science 281:555-559.
11. Funk, DJ, 1998. Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbeinae leaf beetles. Evolution 52:1744-1759.
12. Grant SW and Bowen BW, 1998. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. J Hered 89:415-426.
13. Great Plains Flora Association, 1977. Atlas of the flora of the Great Plains. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
14. Great Plains Flora Association, 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
15. Groman JD and Pellmyr O, 2000. Rapid evolution and specialization following host colonization in a yucca moth. J Evol Biol 13:223-236.
16. Harrison RG, Rand DM, and Wheeler WS, 1987. Mitochondrial DNA variation in field crickets across a narrow hybrid zone. Mol Biol Evol 4:144-158.
17. Kirkpatrick M and Ravigné V, 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am Nat 159:S22-S36.
18. Leebens-Mack JH, Pellmyr O, and Brock M, 1998. Host specificity and the genetic structure of two yucca moth species in a yucca hybrid zone. Evolution 52:1376-1382.
19. Massey LK and Hamrick JL, 1998. Genetic diversity and population structure of Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae). Am J Bot 85:340-345.
20. Mayr E, 1963. Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. McCauley DE, Schiff N, Breden FJ, and Chippendale GM, 1995. Genetic differentiation accompanying range expansion by the southwestern corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 88:357-361.
22. McKelvey SD, 1947. Yuccas of the Southwestern United States, vol. 2. Jamaica Plain, MA: Arnold Arboretum.
23. Miles NJ, 1983. Variation in host specificity in the yucca moth Tegeticula yuccasella (Incurvariidae): a morphometric approach. J Lepidopter Soc 37:207-216.
24. Mitter C, Farrell B, and Wiegmann B, 1988. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytogeography promoted plant diversification?. Am Nat 132:107-128.
25. Mopper S and Strauss SY, 1998. Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations: effects of ecology, life history, and behavior. New York: Chapman & Hall.
26. Nason JD, Heard SB, and Williams FP, 2002. Host associated genetic differentiation in the goldenrod elliptical-gall moth, Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Evolution 56:1475-1488.
27. Pammel LH, 1925. The extension of the yucca moth. Science 61:414-415.
28. Pellmyr O, 1999. Systematic revision of the yucca moths in the Tegeticula yuccasella complex (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae) north of Mexico. Syst Entomol 24:243-271.
29. Pellmyr O, 2003. Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: a review. Ann Missour Bot Gard 90:35-55.
30. Pellmyr O and Balcázar-Lara M, 2000. Systematics of the yucca moth genus Parategeticula (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae), with description of three Mexican species. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:432-439.
31. Pellmyr O and Krenn HW, 2002. Origin of a complex key innovation in an obligate plant-insect mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:5498-5502.
32. Pellmyr O and Leebens-Mack J, 1999. Forty million years of mutualism: evidence for Eocene origin of the yucca-yucca moth association. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:9178-9183.
33. Pellmyr O and Leebens-Mack J, 2000. Reversal of mutualism as a mechanism for adaptive radiation of yucca moths. Am Nat 156:S62-S76.
34. Pellmyr O, Leebens-Mack JH, and Huth C, 1996. Non-mutalistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences. Nature 380:256-257.
35. Peterson MA and Denno RF, 1998. Life-history strategies and the genetic structure of phytophagous insect populations. In: Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations: effects of ecology, life history, and behavior (Mopper S and Strauss SY, eds). New York: Chapman & Hall; 263-322.
36. Porter AH and Geiger H, 1995. Limitations to the inferences of gene flow at regional geographic scales: an example from the Pieris napi group (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Europe. Biol J Linn Soc 54:329-348.
37. Posada D, Crandall KA, and Templeton AR, 1999. GeoDis: a program for the cladistic nested analysis of the geographical distribution of genetic haplotypes. Mol Ecol 9:487-488.
38. Riley CV, 1873. On the oviposition of the yucca moth. Am Nat 7:619-623.
39. Riley CV, 1892. The yucca moth and Yucca pollination. In: Third annual report of the Missouri Botanical Gardens. St Louis: Missouri Botanical Gardens; 99-159.
40. Schneider SD, Roessili D, and Excoffier L, 2000. Arlequin, version 2.000: a software for genetic data analysis. Geneva: Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva.
41. Slatkin M, 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787-792.
42. Slatkin M and Barton NH, 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43:1349-1368.
43. Tajima F, 1996. The amount of DNA polymorphism maintained in a finite population when the neutral mutation rate varies among sites. Genetics 143:1457-1465.
44. Templeton AR, 1998. Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic date: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Mol Ecol 7:381-397.
45. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, and Sing CF, 1992. A cladisitic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data III. cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619-633.
46. Templeton AR, Routman E, and Phillips C, 1995. Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the Tiger Salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics 140:767-782.
47. Templeton AR, and Sing CF, 1993. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping, IV nested analysis with uncertainty and recombination. Genetics 134:659-669.
48. Thompson JN, 1994. The coevolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Thompson JN, 1999. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic hypothesis of coevolution. Am Nat 153:S1-S14.
50. Via S, 2001. Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends Ecol Evol 16:381-390.