A Two-locus Molecular Characterization of Paramecium calkinsi

Protist

Volumn 163, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 263-273

  Przyboś, Ewa ^a   Tarcz, Sebastian ^a   Potekhin, Alexey ^b   Rautian, Maria ^b   Prajer, Małgorzata ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION OF ANIMALS   (Poland)

^b ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

COI mtDNA; Intraspecific polymorphism; ITS1 5.8S ITS2 LSU rDNA; Molecular phylogeny; Paramecium calkinsi.

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; NUCLEOTIDE; PROTOZOAL DNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 5.8S;

ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; PARAMECIUM; PHYLOGENY; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TETRAHYMENA;

CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DNA, PROTOZOAN; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PROTOZOAN; NUCLEOTIDES; PARAMECIUM; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 5.8S; RUSSIA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TETRAHYMENA;

AURELIA; BURSARIA (CILIATA); CILIOPHORA; PARAMECIUM; PARAMECIUM AURELIA; PARAMECIUM BURSARIA; PARAMECIUM CALKINSI; PARAMECIUM CAUDATUM; PARAMECIUM JENNINGSI; PARAMECIUM MULTIMICRONUCLEATUM; PARAMECIUM PRIMAURELIA; PARAMECIUM SCHEWIAKOFFI; PARAMECIUM SEXAURELIA; PARAMECIUM TETRAURELIA; PARAMECIUM TREDECAURELIA; PROTOZOA; TETRAHYMENA;

EID: 84856218584     PISSN: 14344610     EISSN: 16180941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2011.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Barth D., Krenek S., Fokin S.I., Berendonk T.U. Intraspecififc genetic variation in Paramecium revealed by mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I sequences. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2006, 53:20-25.
2. Barth D., PrzyboŚ E., Fokin S.I., Schlegel M., Berendonk T.U. Cytochrome b sequence data suggest rapid speciation within the Paramecium aurelia species complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2008, 49:669-673.
3. Catania F., Würmser F., Potekhin A.A., PrzyboŚ E., Lynch M. Genetic diversity in the Paramecium aurelia species complex. Mol Biol Evol 2009, 26:421-431.
4. Coleman A.W. Paramecium aurelia revisited. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2005, 52:68-77.
5. Dunthorn M., Foissner W., Katz L.A. Expanding character sampling for ciliate phylogenetic inference using mitochondrial SSU-rDNA as a molecular marker. Protist 2011, 162:85-99.
6. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
7. Fokin S.I. Morphological diversity of the micronuclei in Paramecium. Arch Protistenkd 1997, 148:375-387.
8. Fokin S.I. Paramecium (Ciliophora, Protista). Taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships. Zool Zhurnal 2001, 80:899-908. In Russian.
9. Fokin S.I., Chivilev S.M. Brackish water Paramecium species and Paramecium polycaryum. Morphometrical analysis and some biological peculiarities. Acta Protozool 1999, 38:105-117.
10. Fokin S.I., PrzyboŚ E., Chivilev S.M. Nuclear reorganization variety in Paramecium (Ciliophora: Peniculida) and its possible evolution. Acta Protozool 2001, 40:249-261.
11. Fokin S.I., Stoeck T., Schmidt H.J. Rediscovery of Paramecium nephridiatum Gelei, 1925 and its characteristics. J Eukaryot Microbiol 1999, 46:416-425.
12. Fokin S.I., Stoeck T., Schmidt H.J. Paramecium dubosqui Chatton, Brachon. Distribution, ecology and taxonomy, 1933. Eur J Protistol 1999, 35:161-167.
13. Fokin S.I., PrzyboŚ E., Chivilev S.M., Beier C.L., Horn M., Skotarczak B., Wodecka B., Fujishima M. Morphological and molecular investigations of Paramecium schewiakoffi nov. spec. (Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea) and current status of Paramecium distribution, and taxonomy of Paramecium spp. Eur J Protistol 2004, 40:225-243.
14. Greczek-Stachura M., Tarcz S., PrzyboŚ E. Intra-specific differentiation of Paramecium bursaria strains by molecular methods - preliminary studies. Folia biol (Kraków) 2010, 58:35-45.
15. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, 41:95-98.
16. Hori M., Tomikawa I., PrzyboŚ E., Fujishima M. Comparison of the evolutionary distances among syngens and sibling species of Paramecium. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2006, 38:697-704.
17. Hoshina R., Hayashi S., Imamura N. Intraspecific genetic divergence of Paramecium bursaria and reconstruction of paramecian phylogenetic tree. Acta Protozool 2006, 42:171-181.
18. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980, 16:111-120.
19. Landis W.G. The Interplay among Ecology, Breeding Systems, and Genetics in the Paramecium aurelia and Paramecium bursaria Complexes. Progress in Protistology 1986, Vol. 1:287-307. Biopress, Bristol.
20. Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1451-1452.
21. Nakata A. Mating types in Paramecium calkinsi. Doubutsugaku zasshi 1958, 67:210-213. (in Japanese, English Abstract).
22. Nei M., Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Nekrasova I.V., PrzyboŚ E., Rautian M.S., Potekhin A.A. Electrophoretic karyotype polymorphism of sibling species of the Paramecium aurelia complex. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2010, 57:494-507.
24. Page R.D.M. TreeView: An application to display phylogenetic tress on personal computers. Bioinformatics 1996, 12:357-358.
25. Posada D. ModelTest Server: a web-based tool for the statistical selection of models of nucleotide substitution online. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:700-703.
26. Potekhin A., Nekrasova I., Skoblo I., Berendonk T., Rautian M. Sibling species concept in ciliates Paramecium revisited: zoogeographic and genomic aspects of syngen biology. Protistology 2007, 5:64-65.
27. PrzyboŚ E. Cytological and karyological studies of Paramecium jenningsi. Folia biol (Kraków) 1978, 26:25-29.
28. PrzyboŚ E., Skotarczak B., Wodecka B. Phylogenetic relationships of Paramecium jenningsi strains (classical analysis and RAPD studies). Folia biol (Kraków) 2003, 51:185-195.
29. PrzyboŚ E., Tarcz S., Fokin S. Molecular polymorphism of Paramecium tetraurelia (Ciliophora, Protozoa) in strains originating from different continents. Folia biol (Kraków) 2009, 57:57-63.
30. PrzyboŚ E., Tarcz S., Greczek-Stachura M., Surmacz M. Polymorphism of Paramecium pentaurelia (Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea) strains revealed by rDNA and mtDNA sequences" Eur J Protistol 2011, 47:138-143.
31. PrzyboŚ E., Prajer M., Greczek-Stachura M., Skotarczak B., Maciejewska A., Tarcz S. Genetic analysis of the Paramecium aurelia species complex (Protozoa: Ciliophora) by classical and molecular methods. Syst Biodivers 2007, 5:417-434.
32. PrzyboŚ E., Tarcz S., Greczek-Stachura M., Surmacz M., Potekhin A., Rautian M. Molecular studies on intra-specific differentiation of Paramecium dodecaurelia, with description of new stands of the species (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Folia biol (Kraków) 2008, 56:249-262.
33. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
34. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-425.
35. Sonneborn T.M. Methods in Paramecium Research. Methods in Cell Physiology 1970, Vol. 4:241-339. Academic Press, New York, London.
36. Sonneborn T.M. The Paramecium aurelia complex of fourteen sibling species. Trans Am Microsc Soc 1975, 94:155-178.
37. Stoeck T., PrzyboŚ E., Schmidt H.J. Combination of genetics with inter-and intra-strain crosses and RAPD-fingerprints reveals different population structures within the Paramecium aurelia species complex. Eur J Protistol 1998, 34:348-355.
38. Stoeck T., Welter H., Seitz-Bender D., Kusch J., Schmidt H.J. ARDRA and RAPD-fingerprinting reject the sibling species concept for the ciliate Paramecium caudatum (Ciliophora, Protista). Zool Scripta 2000, 29:75-82.
39. Strüder-Kypke M.C., Lynn D.H. Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene in ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) and evaluation of its suitability as a biodiversity marker. Syst Biodivers 2010, 8:131-148.
40. Strüder-Kypke M.C., Wright A-DG, Fokin S.I., Lynn D.H. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Paramecium inferred from small subunit rRNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2000, 14:122-130.
41. Strüder-Kypke M.C., Wright A-DG, Fokin S.I., Lynn D.H. Phylogenetic relationships of the subclass Peniculia (Oligohemenophorea, Ciliophora) inferred from small subunit rRNA gene sequences. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2000, 47:419-429.
42. Swofford DL (2002) In: PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods, version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
43. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24:1596-1599.
44. Tamura K., Nei M., Kumar S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:11030-11035.
45. Tarcz S., PrzyboŚ E., Prajer M., Greczek-Stachura M. Intraspecific variation of diagnostic rDNA genes in Paramecium dodecaurelia, P. tredecaurelia and P. quadecaurelia (Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea). Acta Protozool 2006, 45:255-263.
46. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:4673-4680.
47. Vivier E. Morphology, Taxonomy and General Biology of the Genus Paramecium. Paramecium, a Current Survey 1974, 1-89. Elsevier, Amsterdam. W.J. Van Wagtendonk (Ed.).
48. Wenrich D.H. Eight well-defined species of Paramecium (Protozoa, Ciliata). Trans Am Microsc Soc 1928, 47:275.
49. Wichterman R. The Biology of Paramecium 1986, Plenum Press, New York, London. 2nd Edition.
50. Woodruff L.L. The structure, life history, and intrageneric relationships of Paramecium calkinsi, sp. nov. Biol Bull 1921, 41:171-180.