P300 in neglect

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 496-506

  Saevarsson, Styrmir ^a,b   Kristjánsson, Árni ^c   Bach, Michael ^a   Heinrich, Sven P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b Chirurgische Klinik Munchen Bogenhausen   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Attention; Event related potential; Neglect; P300; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DISTURBANCE; AWARENESS; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTRACTIBILITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEMISPATIAL NEGLECT; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84856215519     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.028     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 5: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 23:107-110.
2. Becker D.E., Shapiro D. Directing attention toward stimuli affects the P300 but not the orienting response. Psychophysiology 1980, 17:385-389.
3. Bernat E., Shevrin H., Snodgrass M. Subliminal visual oddball stimuli evoke a P300 response. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:159-171.
4. Bledowski C., Prvulovic D., Hoechstetter K., Scherg M., Wibral M., Goebel R., et al. Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: a combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2004, 24:9353-9360.
5. Bonala B., Boutros N.N., Jansen B.H. Target probability affects the likelihood that a P300 will be generated in response to a target stimulus, but not its amplitude. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:93-99.
6. Deouell L.Y., Hämäläinen H., Bentin S. Unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere damage: contributions from event-related potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2000, 5:225-234.
7. Driver J., Vuilleumier P. Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition 2001, 79:39-88.
8. Driver J., Vuilleumier P., Eimer M., Rees G. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potential correlates of conscious and unconscious vision in parietal extinction patients. Neuroimage 2001, 14:68-75.
9. Duncan C.C., Barry R.J., Connolly J.F., Fischer C., Michie P.T., Näätänen R., et al. Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1883-1908.
10. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977, 14:456-467.
11. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. The time constant in P300 recording. Psychophysiology 1979, 16:53-55.
12. Fabiani M., Gratton G., Coles M.G.H. Event-related brain potentials. Handbook of psychophysiology 2000, 53-84. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed. L.G. Cacioppo, G.G. Berntson (Eds.).
13. Geng J.J., Eger E., Ruff C., Kristjánsson á, Rothsthein P., Driver J. On-line attentional selection from competing stimuli in opposite visual fields: effects on human visual cortex and control processes. J Neurophysiol 2006, 96:2601-2612.
14. Halsband U., Gruhn S., Ettlinger G. Unilateral neglect and defective performance in one half of space. Int J Neurosci 1985, 28:173-195.
15. Heilman K.M., Watson R.T., Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. Clinical neuropsychology 2003, 293-346. Oxford University Press, New York. 4th ed. K.M. Heilman, E. Valenstein (Eds.).
16. Heinrich S.P., Bach M. Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli. Doc Ophthalmol 2008, 117:73-83.
17. Heinrich S.P., Mell D., Bach M. Frequency-domain analysis of fast oddball responses to visual stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 2009, 73:287-293.
18. Heinrich SP, Bach M, Kristjánsson á, Saevarsson S. P300 responses in visuo-spatial neglect reflect task accuracy. In: Seventeenth annual Cognitive Neuroscience Society meeting; 2010 [Abstract C30].
19. Heinrich S.P., Marhöfer D., Bach M. " Cognitive" visual acuity estimation based on the event-related potential P300 component. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 21:1464-1472.
20. Heinze H.J., Luck S.J., Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. Evidence for early selection. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990, 75:511-527.
21. Holm S.A. Simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979, 6:65-70.
22. Hoshiyama M., Kakigi R. Effects of attention on pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: foveal field stimulation versus peripheral field stimulation. Brain Topogr 2001, 13:293-298.
23. Karnath H.O., Himmelbach M., Küker W. The cortical substrate of visual extinction. Neuroreport 2003, 14:437-442.
24. Katayama J., Polich J. P300, probability and the three-tone paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 100:555-562.
25. Kinsbourne M. Hemispace and hemispatial neglect. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect 1987, 69-86. Elsevier, New York. M. Jeannerod (Ed.).
26. Kristjánsson á, Campana G. Where perception meets memory: a review of priming in visual search. Attention Percept Psychophys 2010, 72:5-18.
27. Kristjánsson á., Driver J. Priming in visual search: separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal. Vision Res 2008, 48:1217-1232.
28. Kristjánsson á., Vuilleumier P., Malhotra P., Husain M., Driver J. Priming of color and position during visual search in unilateral spatial neglect. J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17:859-873.
29. Kristjánsson á., Vuilleumier P., Schwartz S., Macaluso E., Driver J. Neural basis for priming of pop-out during visual search revealed with fMRI. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17:1612-1624.
30. Lhermitte F., Turell E., LeBrigand D., Chain F. Unilateral visual neglect and wave P300. A study of nine cases with unilateral lesions of the parietal lobes. Arch Neurol 1985, 42:567-573.
31. Marzi C.A., Girelli M., Miniussi C., Smania N., Maravita A. Electrophysiological correlates of conscious vision: evidence from unilateral extinction. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12:869-877.
32. Mell D., Bach M., Heinrich S.P. Fast stimulus sequences improve the efficiency of event-related potential P300 recordings. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 174:259-264.
33. Odom J.V., Bach M., Brigell M., Holder G.H., McCulloch D.L., Tormene A.P., et al. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2010, 120:111-119.
34. Pavlovskaya M., Sorokera N., Bonneh Y. Extinction is not a natural consequence of unilateral spatial neglect: evidence from contrast detection experiments. Neurosci Lett 2007, 420:240-244.
35. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 9:456-479.
36. Polich J. Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987, 68:311-320.
37. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:2128-2148.
38. Polich J., Corey-Bloom J. Alzheimer's disease and P300: review and evaluation of task and modality. Curr Alzheimer Res 2005, 2:515-525.
39. Polich J., Kok A. Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review. Biol Psychol 1995, 41:103-146.
40. Rees G., Wojciulik E., Clarke K., Husain M., Frith C., Driver J. Unconscious activation of visual cortex in the damaged right hemisphere of a parietal patient with extinction. Brain 2000, 123:1624-1633.
41. Rengachary J., d'Avossa G., Sapir A., Shulman G.L., Corbetta M. Is the Posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 90:2081-2088.
42. Robertson L.C. The role of perceptual organization and search in attentional disorders. Cognitive neuropsychology in clinical practice 1992, 70-96. Oxford University Press, New York. D.I. Margolin (Ed.).
43. Rossit S., Malhotra P., Muir K., Reeves I., Duncan G., Birschel P., et al. The neural basis of visuomotor deficits in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2149-2153.
44. Russo D.F., Aprile T., Spitoni G., Spinelli D. Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study. Brain 2008, 131:842-854.
45. Saevarsson S., Halsband U., Kristjánsson á. Designing rehabilitation programs for neglect: could 2 be more than 1+1?. Appl Neuropsychol 2011, 18:95-106.
46. Saevarsson S., Jóelsdóttir S., Hjaltason H., Kristjánsson á. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1161-1169.
47. Sawaki R., Katayama J. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations. J Vision 2008, 8(15):4.
48. Simons R.F., Graham F.K., Miles M.A., Chen X. On the relationship of P3a and the novelty-P3. Biol Psychol 2001, 56:207-218.
49. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975, 38:387-401.
50. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965, 150:1187-1188.
51. Vallar G. The anatomical basis of spatial hemineglect in humans. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies 1993, 27-59. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove. I.H. Robertson, J.C. Marshall (Eds.).
52. Verdon V., Schwartz S., Lovblad K.-O., Hauert C.A., Vuilleumier P. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain 2009, 133:880-894.
53. Verleger R., Heide W., Butt C., Wascher E., Kompf D. On-line brain potential correlates of right parietal patients' attentional deficit. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 99:444-457.
54. Verleger R., Paehge T., Kolev V., Yordanova J., JaŚkowski P. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3. Biol Psychol 2006, 73:298-313.
55. Vuilleumier P., Schwartz S., Husain M., Clarke K., Driver J. Implicit processing and learning of visual stimuli in parietal extinction and neglect. Cortex 2001, 37:741-744.
56. Wilkinson R.T., Seales D.M. EEG event-related potentials and signal detection. Biol Psychol 1978, 7:13-28.
57. Wilson B., Cockburn J., Halligan P.W. Behavioral inattention test 1987, Bury St. Edmunds, Thomas Valley.