Target probability affects the likelihood that a P300 will be generated in response to a target stimulus, but not its amplitude

Psychophysiology

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-99

  Bonala, Bharat ^a   Boutros, Nashaat N ^b   Jansen, Ben H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potential (ERP); Local target probability; P300; Sequence effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 36849054488     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00613.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Croft, R. J., Gonsalvez, C. J., Gabriel, C. Barry, R. J. (2003). Target-to-target interval versus probability effects on P300 in one- and two-tone tasks. Psychophysiology, 40, 322 328.
2. Curry, J. G. Polich, J. (1992). P300, global probability, and stimulus sequence effects in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8, 185 202.
3. Donchin, E. E. Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context-updating? Behavioural and Brain Science, 11, 357 375.
4. Duncan-Johnson, C. C. Donchin, E. (1977). On qualifying surprise: The variation in event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456 467.
5. Duncan-Johnson, C. C. Donchin, E. (1984). The P300 event-related potential as an index of information processing. Biological Psychology, 14, 1 52.
6. Fitzgerald, P. G. Picton, T. W. (1981). Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 188 200.
7. Ford, J. M., Duncan-Johnson, C. C., Pfefferbaum, A. Kopell, B. S. (1982). Expectancy for events in old age: Stimulus sequence effects on P300 and reaction time. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 696 704.
8. Ford, J. M., White, P., Lim, K. O. Pfefferbaum, A. (1994). Schizophrenics have fewer and smaller P300s: A single trial analysis. Biological Psychiatry, 103, 35 96.
9. Garoosi, V. Jansen, B. H. (2000). Development and evaluation of piecewise Prony method for evoked potential analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 47, 1549 1554.
10. Gonsalvez, C. J., Gordon, E., Anderson, K., Pettigrew, G., Barry, R. J., Rennie, C. Meares, R. (1995). Numbers of preceding nontargets differentially affect responses to targets in normal volunteers and patients with schizophrenia: A study of event-related potentials. Psychiatry Research, 58, 69 75.
11. Gonsalvez, C. J., Gordon, E., Grayson, S., Barry, R. J., Lazzaro, I. Bahramali, H. (1999). Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude? Psychophysiology, 36, 643 654.
12. Gonsalvez, C. J. Polich, J. (2002). P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology, 39, 388 396.
13. Haig, A. R. Gordon, E. (1998). EEG alpha phase at stimulus onset significantly affects the amplitude of the P3 ERP component. International Journal of Neuroscience, 93, 101 116.
14. Haig, A. R., Gordon, E., Rogers, G. Anderson, J. (1995). Classification of single-trial ERP sub-types: Application of globally optimal vector quantization using simulated annealing. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 288 297.
15. Johnson, R. Jr. Donchin, E. (1982). Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: An electrophysiological approach. Psychophysiology, 19, 183 200.
16. Leuthold, H. Sommer, W. (1993). Stimulus presentation rate dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction times. Psychophysiology, 30, 510 517.
17. Miltner, W., Johnson, R. Braun, C. (1991). Auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: II. Effects of inter-stimulus interval. Journal of Psychophysiology, 5, 27 42.
18. Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 456 479.
19. Polich, J. (1990a). Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 10, 163 170.
20. Polich, J. (1990b). P300, probability, and inter-stimulus interval. Psychophysiology, 27, 396 403.
21. Polich, J. Bondurant, T. (1997). P300 sequence effects, probability, and interstimulus interval. Physiology and Behaviour, 61, 843 849.
22. Polich, J., Brock, T. Geisler, M. W. (1991). P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: Probability and inter stimulus interval. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 219 223.
23. Pritchard, W. S. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 506 540.
24. Schwent, V. L., Hillyard, S. A. Galambos, R. (1976). Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. I. Effects of stimulus delivery rate. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 40, 604 614.
25. Spehlmann, R. (1985). Evoked potential primer. Stoneham, MA : Butterworth Publishers.
26. Squires, K. C., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K. Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142 1146.
27. Wagner, P., Roschke, J., Grozinger, M. Mann, K. (2000). A replication study on P300 single trial analysis in schizophrenia: Confirmation of a reduced number of "true positive" P300 waves. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 34, 255 259.
28. Woods, D. L., Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A. Galambos, R. (1980). Recovery cycles of event-related potentials in multiple detection tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 50, 335 347.