Penalized regression techniques for modeling relationships between metabolites and tomato taste attributes

Euphytica

Volumn 183, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 379-387

  Menéndez, Patricia ^a,b   Eilers, Paul ^a,c   Tikunov, Yury ^a,b   Bovy, Arnaud ^a,b   van Eeuwijk, Fred ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Centre for BioSystems Genetics   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Metabolites; Penalized regression; Phenotype prediction; Stepwise regression; Tomato taste attributes; Variable selection

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 84856214574     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: 15735060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-011-0374-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agarwal S, Rao AV (2000) Tomato lycopene and its role in human health and chronic diseases. CMAJ 163: 739-744.
2. Abegaz EG, Tandon KS, Scott JW, Baldwin EA, Shewfelt RL (2004) Partitioning taste from aromatic flavor notes of fresh tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill) to develop predictive models as a function of volatile and nonvolatile component. Postharvest Biol Technol 34: 227-235.
3. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control 19: 716-723.
4. Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO, Moshonas MG (1991) Quantitative analysis of flavour and other volatiles and for certain constituents of two tomato cultivars during ripening. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116: 265-269.
5. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 26: 123-140.
6. Broman KW, Speed TP (2002) A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses. J R Stat Soc B 64: 641-656.
7. Carli P, Arima S, Fogliano V, Tardella L, Frusciante L, Ercolano MR (2009) Use of network analysis to capture key traits affecting tomato organoleptic quality. J Exp Bot 60: 3379-3386.
8. Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R (2004) Least angle regression. Ann Statist 32: 407-499.
9. Efroymson MA (1960) Multiple regression analysis. Mathematical methods for digital computers. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 191-203.
10. Friedman J, Hastie T, Hoefling H, Tibshirani T (2007) Pathwise coordinate optimization. Ann Appl Statist 1: 302-332.
11. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, New York.
12. Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970) Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12: 55-67.
13. Krumbein A, Auerswald H (1998) Characterization of aroma volatiles in tomatoes by sensory analyses. Nahrung 42: 395-399.
14. Krumbein A, Peters P, Bruckner B (2004) Flavour compounds and quantitative descriptive analysis of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) of different cultivars in short-term storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 32: 15-28.
15. Leng C, Linand Y, Wahba G (2006) A note on the Lasso and related procedures in model selection. Statistica Sinica 16: 1273-1284.
16. Roessner-Tunali U, Hegemann B, Lytovchenko A, Carrari F, Bruedigam C, Granot D, Fernie AR (2003) Metabolic profiling of transgenic tomato plants overexpressing hexokinase reveals that the influence of hexose phosphorylation diminishes during fruit development. Plant Physiol 133: 84-99.
17. Saliba-Colombani V, Causse M, Langlois D, Philouze J, Buret M (2001) Genetic analysis of organoleptic quality in fresh market tomato. 1. Mapping QTLs for physical and chemical traits. Theor Appl Genet 102: 259-272.
18. Skovgaard IM (1995) Modelling relations between instrumental and sensory measurements in factorial experiments. Food Qual Pref 6: 239-244.
19. Schwarz GE (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist 6: 461-464.
20. Stone M (1974) Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. J R Statist Soc B 36: 111-147.
21. Tandon KS, Baldwin JW, Scott JW, Shewfelt RL (2003) Linking sensory descriptors to volatile and nonvolatile components of fresh tomato flavor. J Food Sci 68: 2366-2371.
22. Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J Royal Statist Soc B 58: 267-288.
23. Tikunov Y, Lommen A, De Vos CHR, Verhoeven HA, Bino RJ, Hall RD, Bovy AG (2005) A novel approach for nontargeted data analysis for metabolomics. Large-scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiol 139: 1125-1137.
24. Ursem R, Tikunov Y, Bovy A, van Berloo R, van Eeuwijk FA (2008) A correlation network approach to metabolite data analysis for tomato fruits. Euphytica 161: 181-193.
25. van Berloo R, Zhu A, Ursem R, Verbakel H, Gort G, van Eeuwijk FA (2008a) Diversity and linkage disequilibrium analysis within a selected set of cultivated tomatoes. Theor Appl Genet 117: 89-101.
26. van Berloo R, van Heusden AW, Bovy AG, Meijer-Dekens RG, Lindhout P, Eeuwijk van FA (2008b) Genetic research in a public-private research consortium: prospects for indirect use of Elige breeding germplasm in academic research. Euphytica 161: 293-300.
27. van der Kooij AJ (2007) Prediction accuracy and stability of regression with optimal scaling transformations. Child and Family Studies and Data Theory (AGP-D), Department of Education and Child Studies, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University.
28. Verkerke W, Janse J, Kersten M (1998) Instrumental measurement and modeling of tomato fruit taste. Acta Hort 456: 199-205.
29. Zou H, Hastie T (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Statist Soc B 67: 301-320.
30. Zou H, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2007) On the degrees of freedom of the lasso. Annals Statist 35: 2173-2192.