Comparison of outcomes on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis: Results from a USA database

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 679-684

  Cnossen, Trijntje T ^a   Usvyat, Len ^b   Kotanko, Peter ^b   van der Sande, Frank M ^a   Kooman, Jeroen P ^a   Carter, Mary ^b   Leunissen, Karel M L ^a   Levin, Nathan W ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RENAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; Dialysis adequacy; Outcome; Residual renal function; Technique survival

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN;

ADULT; ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; BODY WEIGHT; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFECTION RATE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE RATE; RESIDUAL RENAL FUNCTION; RESIDUAL VOLUME; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TUNNEL INFECTION RATE; UNITED STATES;

AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84856190341     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: 17184304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2010.00004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rabindranath KS, Adams J, Ali TZ, Daly C, Vale L, MacLeod AM. Automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22:2991-8.
2. Rodríguez-Carmona A, Pérez Fontán M. Sodium removal in patients undergoing CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2002; 22:705-13.
3. Ortega O, Gallar P, Carreño A, Gutierrez M, Rodriguez I, Oliet A, et al. Peritoneal sodium mass removal in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis: influence on blood pressure control. Am J Nephrol 2001; 21:189-93.
4. Ates K, Nergizoglu G, Keven K, Sen A, Kutlay S, Ertürk S, et al. Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2001; 60:767-76.
5. Rodriguez-Carmona A, Pérez-Fontán M, Garca-Naveiro R, Villaverde P, Peteiro J. Compared time profiles of ultrafiltration, sodium removal, and renal function in incident CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 44:132-45.
6. Hufnagel G, Michel C, Queffeulou G, Skhiri H, Damieri H, Mignon F. The influence of automated peritoneal dialysis on the decrease in residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14:1224-8.
7. Holley JL, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis is associated with lower rates of catheter infections than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 16:133-6.
8. Rabindranath KS, Adams J, Ali TZ, MacLeod AM, Vale L, Cody J, et al. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 18(2): CD006515.
9. Michels WM, Verduijn M, Boeschoten EW, Dekker FW, Krediet RT; NECOSAD Study Group. Similar survival on automated peritoneal dialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a large prospective cohort. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:943-9.
10. Badve SV, Hawley CM, McDonald SP, Mudge DW, Rosman JB, Brown FG, et al. Automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have similar outcomes. Kidney Int 2008; 73:480-8.
11. Guo A, Mujais S. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney Int 2003; (88):S3-12.
12. Mujais S, Story K. Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts. Kidney Int Suppl 2006; (103):S21-6.
13. Sanchez AR, Madonia C, Rascon-Pacheco RA. Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a Mexican PD center. Kidney Int Suppl 2008; (108): S76-80.
14. Jager KJ, Merkus MP, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Tijssen JG, Stevens P, et al; NECOSAD Study Group. Mortality and technique failure in patients starting chronic peritoneal dialysis: results of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. Kidney Int 1999; 55:1476-85.
15. Davidson SN, Jhangri GS, Jindal K, Pannu N. Comparison of volume overload with cycler-assisted versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:1044-50.
16. European best Practice Guidelines Working Group in Peritoneal Dialysis. European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis: automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20(Suppl 9):ix21-3.
17. Huang JW, Hung KY, Yen CJ, Wu KD, Tsai TJ. Comparison of infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis patients using either a twin-bag system or automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:604-7.
18. Rodriguez-Carmona A, Perez FM, Garcia Falcon T, Fernandez Rivera C, Valdes F. A comparative analysis on the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19:253-8.
19. Jones CH, Wells L, Stoves J, Farquhar F, Woodrow G. Can a reduction in extracellular fluid volume result in increased serum albumin in peritoneal dialysis patients? Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39:872-5.
20. Westra WM, Kopple JD, Krediet RT, Appell M, Mehrotra R. Dietary protein requirements and dialysate protein losses in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27:192-5.
21. Rodríguez AM, Díaz NV, Cubillo LP, Plana JT, Riscos MA, Delgado RM, et al. Automated peritoneal dialysis: a Spanish multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13:2335-40.
22. Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte-Jensen P, Klem S, Almtoft B, Danielsen H, et al. A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing CCPD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19:526-33.
23. Wang MC, Tseng CC, Tsai WC, Huang JJ. Blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients on different peritoneal dialysis regimens. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21:36-42.
24. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN; for the CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. The importance of residual renal function for survival in patients on peritoneal dialysis [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8:185a.