Peritoneal dialysis in the US: Evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts

Kidney International

Volumn 70, Issue SUPPL. 103, 2006, Pages

  Mujais, S ^a   Story, K ^a  

^a BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Patient survival; Peritoneal dialysis; Technique survival

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; FEMALE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SURVIVAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RENAL DIALYSIS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 39049189105     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001912     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Huisman RM, Nieuwenhuizen MG, Th de Charro F. Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in The Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 1655-1660.
2. Schaubel DE, Blake PG, Fenton SS. Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1517-1524.
3. Schaubel DE, Blake PG, Fenton SS. Trends in CAPD technique failure: Canada, 1981-1997. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 365-371.
4. Jager KJ, Merkus MP, Boeschoten EW et al. What happens to patients starting dialysis in the Netherlands? Neth J Med 2001; 58: 163-173.
5. Schaubel DE, Fenton SS. Trends in mortality on peritoneal dialysis: Canada, 1981-1997. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 126-133.
6. Blake PG. Trends in patient and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis and strategies: how are we doing and how can we do better? Adv Ren Replace Ther 2000; 7: 324-337.
7. Kawaguchi Y. Peritoneal dialysis as long-term treatment: comparison of technique survival between Asian and Western populations. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19(Suppl 2): S327-S328.
8. Jager KJ, Merkus MP, Dekker FW et al. Mortality and technique failure in patients starting chronic peritoneal dialysis: results of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. NECOSAD Study Group. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 1476-1485.
9. Thome FS, Rodrigues AT, Bruno R et al. CAPD in southern Brazil: an epidemiological study. Adv Perit Dial 1997; 13: 141-145.
10. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 112-117.
11. Fox JG, Fowler I, Boulton-Jones JM. Audit of a decade of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993; 8: 240-243.
12. Innes A, Burden RP, Morgan AG. Improvements in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis technique survival: further experience from a UK renal unit. Perit Dial Int 1993; 13: 307-309.
13. Piraino B, Bernardini J, Holley JL, Perlmutter JA. A comparison of peritoneal dialysis-related infections in short- and long-term peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 1993; 13: 194-197.
14. Viglino G, Cancarini G, Catizone L et al. Ten years of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: analysis of patient and technique survival. Perit Dial Int 1993; 13(Suppl 2): S175-S179.
15. Vonesh EF, Maiorca R. A multicenter, selection-adjusted comparison of patient and technique survival on CAPD and hemodialysis: a clarification. Perit Dial Int 1993; 13: 71-72.
16. de Fijter CW, Oe LP, Nauta JJ et al. Clinical efficacy and morbidity associated with continuous cyclic compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 264-271.
17. Jindal KK, Hirsch DJ. Excellent technique survival on home peritoneal dialysis: results of a regional program. Perit Dial Int 1994; 14: 324-326.
18. Lupo A, Tarchini R, Carcarini G et al. Long-term outcome in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a 10-year-survey by the Italian Cooperative Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24: 826-837.
19. Nolph KD. Technique survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1994; 14: 322-323.
20. Viglino G, Cancarini GC, Catizone L et al. Ten years experience of CAPD in diabetics: comparison of results with non-diabetics. Italian Cooperative Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994; 9: 1443-1448.
21. Genestier S, Hedelin G, Schaffer P, Faller B. Prognostic factors in CAPD patients: a retrospective study of a 10-year period. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10: 1905-1911.
22. McDonald M, McPhee PD, Walker RJ. Successful self-care home dialysis in the elderly: a single center's experience. Perit Dial Int 1995; 15: 33-36.
23. Saade M, Joglar F. Chronic peritoneal dialysis: seven-year experience in a large Hispanic program. Perit Dial Int 1995; 15: 37-41.
24. Bistrup C, Holm-Nielsen A, Pedersen RS. Technique survival and complication rates in a newly started CAPD center (five years of experience). Perit Dial Int 1996; 16: 90-91.
25. Lambert MC, Vijt D, De Smet R, Lameire N. Patient and technique survival after treatment shifts between CAPD and haemodialysis in a single centre. Edtna Erca J 1996; 22: 4-7, 14.
26. Maiorca R, Cancarini GC, Zubani R et al. CAPD viability: a long-term comparison with hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16: 276-287.
27. Wanten GJ, Koolen MI, van Liebergen FJ et al. Outcome and complications in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) at a single centre during 11 years. Neth J Med 1996; 49: 4-12.
28. Anderson JE. Ten years' experience with CAPD in a nursing home setting. Perit Dial Int 1997; 17: 255-261.
29. Woodrow G, Turney JH, Brownjohn AM. Technique failure in peritoneal dialysis and its impact on patient survival. Perit Dial Int 1997; 17: 360-364.
30. Van Biesen W, Vanholder RC, Veys N et al. An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 116-125.
31. Davies SJ. Peritoneal dialysis in the patient with a failing renal allograft. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21(Suppl 3): S280-S284.
32. Utas C. Patient and technique survival on CAPD in Turkey. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 602-606.
33. Trivedi H, Tan SH, Prowant B et al. Predictors of death in patients on peritoneal dialysis: the Missouri Peritoneal Dialysis Study. Am J Nephrol 2005; 25: 466-473.
34. Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA. A comparison of cause of death between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 184-191.
35. Ganesh SK, Hulbert-Shearon T, Port FK et al. Mortality differences by dialysis modality among incident ESRD patients with and without coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 415-424.
36. Stack AG, Molony DA, Rahman NS et al. Impact of dialysis modality on survival of new ESRD patients with congestive heart failure in the United States. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 1071-1079.
37. Jaar BG, Coresh J, Plantinga LC et al. Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 174-183.
38. Cueto-Manzano AM, Quintana-Pina E, Correa-Rotter R. Long-term CAPD survival and analysis of mortality risk factors: 12-year experience of a single Mexican center. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 148-153.
39. Guo A, Mujais S. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney Int 2003; 64(Suppl 88): S3-S12.
40. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Collins AJ. The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 2389-2401.
41. Xue JL, Chen SC, Ebben JP et al. Peritoneal and hemodialysis: I. Differences in patient characteristics at initiation. Kidney Int 2002; 61: 734-740.
42. Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2851-2860.
43. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M et al. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30: 334-342.
44. Schaubel DE, Morrison HI, Fenton SS. Comparing mortality rates on CAPD/CCPD and hemodialysis. The Canadian experience: fact or fiction? Perit Dial Int 1998; 18: 478-484.
45. Collins AJ, Hao W, Xia H et al. Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 34: 1065-1074.
46. Selgas R, Cirugeda A, Fernandez-Perpen A et al. Comparisons of hemodialysis and CAPD in patients over 65 years of age: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2001; 33: 259-264.
47. Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL, Gilbertson DT, Collins AJ. A comparison of transplant outcomes in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 1423-1430.
48. Schaubel DE, Stewart DE, Morrison HI et al. Sex inequality in kidney transplantation rates. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2349-2354.