Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Rabindranath, Kannaiyan S ^a   Adams, J ^b   Ali, T Z ^b   MacLeod, A M ^b   Vale, L ^b   Cody, J ^b   Wallace, S A ^b   Daly, C ^b  

^a CHURCHILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Humans; Kidney failure, chronic *therapy ; Peritoneal dialysis *methods ; Peritoneal dialysis, continuous ambulatory; Randomized controlled trials as topic

Indexed keywords

DIALYSIS FLUID;

AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CREATININE CLEARANCE; HERNIA; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; HYDROTHORAX; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MORTALITY; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONITIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW;

EID: 44949104198     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006515     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Bro 1999 {published data only} Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte-Jensen P, Klem S, Almtoft B, Danielsen H, et al.A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1999;19(6): 526-33. [MEDLINE: 10641772].
2. De Fijter 1994 {published data only} *de Fijter CW, Oe LP, Nauta JJ, van der Meulen J, Verbrugh HA, Verhoef J, et al.Clinical efficacy and morbidity associated with continuous cyclic compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 1994;120(4):264-71. [MEDLINE: 8291819].
3. de Fijter CW, Oe LP, van der Meulen J, Nauta JJP, Donker AJM. Outcome in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with y-set (capdy) versus continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (ccpd): a prospective, randomized comparison [abstract]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 1992;3(3):408.
4. de Fijter CW, Oe PL, Nauta JJ, van der Meulen J, ter Wee PM, Snoek FJ, et al.A prospective, randomized study comparing the peritonitis incidence of CAPD and Y-connector (CAPD-Y) with continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD). Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis 1991;7:186-9. [MEDLINE: 1680422].
5. de Fijter CW, Oe PL, van der Nauta JJ, Meulen J, ter Wee PM, Snoek FJ, et al.Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: A prospective, randomized comparison between continuous ambulatory PD with Y-connector (CAPD-Y) and continuous cyclic PD (CCPD) [abstract]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 1992;7(2):166-7.
6. De Fijter CW, Oe PL, Verbrugh HA, Nauta JJP, Van Der Meulen J, Verhoef J, et al.Continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis: Clinical efficacy and comparison with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1995;139(13):658-64.
7. de Fijter CW, Snoek FJ. Has continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis surplus value over CAPD-Y regarding clinical outcome? [abstract]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 1993;8(9):1020.
8. Iles-Smith 1999 {published data only} Iles-Smith H, Curwell J, Gokal R. Comparative evaluation of CAPD and PD-plus effectiveness. Edtna-Erca Journal 1999;25(3):27-9. [MEDLINE: 10786491].
9. Basile 2001 Basile C, De Padova F.Comparison of peritonitis incidence in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2001;16(9):1957-8. [MEDLINE: 11522896].
10. Blake 1999a Blake PG. Advantages and disadvantages of automated peritoneal dialysis compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1999;19 Suppl 2:S121-4. [MEDLINE: 10406505].
11. Davies 2001 Davies S, Woodrow G, Plum J, Williams P, Richards C. Comparison of factors related to hydration status in CAPD and APD patients [abstract]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2001; 12(Program & Abstracts):309A.
12. De Fijter 1992 de Fijter CW, Verbrugh HA, Oe LP, Peters ED, van der Meulen J, Donker AJ, et al.Peritoneal defense in continuous ambulatory versus continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis. Kidney International 1992;42 (4):947-50. [MEDLINE: 1453585].
13. De Fijter 1994a de Fijter CW, Verbrugh HA, Oe PL, Heezius EC, Verhoef J, Donker AJ. Antibacterial peritoneal defence in automated peritoneal dialysis: advantages of tidal over continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis?. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 1994;9(2):156-62. [MEDLINE: 8190329].
14. De Wit 2001 de Wit GA, Merkus MP, Krediet RT, de Charro FT. A comparison of quality of life of patients on automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International 2001;21(3):306-12. [MEDLINE: 11475348].
15. Diaz-Buxo 2003 Diaz-Buxo JA. What is the role of automated peritoneal dialysis and continuous flow peritoneal dialysis?. Contributions to Nephrology 2001, (140):264-71. [MEDLINE: 12800368].
16. Gallar 2001 Gallar P, Ortega O, Carreno A, Vigil A. Rate of decline in residual renal function is equal in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Peritoneal Dialysis International 2001;20(6): 803-5.
17. Hiroshige 1996 Hiroshige K, Yuu K, Soejima M, Takasugi M, Kuroiwa A. Rapid decline of residual renal function in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1996;16(3):307-15. [MEDLINE: 8761546].
18. Holley 1990 Holley JL, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis is associated with lower rates of catheter infections than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 1990;16(2):133-6. [MEDLINE: 2382649].
19. Hufnagel 1999 Hufnagel G, Michel C, Queffeulou G, Skhiri H, Damieri H, Mignon F. The influence of automated peritoneal dialysis on the decrease in residual renal function. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 1999;14 (5):1224-8. [MEDLINE: 10344365].
20. Rodriguez 1998 Rodriguez AM, Diaz NV, Cubillo LP, Plana JT, Riscos MA, Delgado RM, et al.Automated peritoneal dialysis: a Spanish multicentre study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 1998;13(9):2335-40. [MEDLINE: 9761518].
21. Rodriguez Carm 2004 Rodriguez-Carmona A, Perez-Fontan M, Garcia-Naveiro R, Villaverde P, Peteiro J. Compared time profiles of ultrafiltration, sodium removal, and renal function in incident CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis patients. American Journal of Kidney Dis-eases 2004;44(1):132-45. [MEDLINE: 15211446].
22. Rodriguez-Carm 1999 Rodriguez-Carmona A, Perez Fontan M, Falcon TG, Fernandez Rivera C, Valdes F. A comparative analysis on the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1999;19(3):253-8. [MEDLINE: 10433162].
23. Rodriguez-Carm 2002 Rodriguez-Carmona A, Fontan MP. Sodium removal in patients undergoing CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dial-ysis International 2002;22(6):705-13. [MEDLINE: 12556073].
24. Rottembourg 1989 Rottembourg J, Issad B, Allouache M, Baumelou A, Deray G, Jacobs C. Clinical aspects of continuous ambulatory and continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1989;9(4):289-94. [MEDLINE: 2488384].
25. Altman 1999 Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?. BMJ 1999; 318(7192):1209. [MEDLINE: 10221955].
26. Bargman 1995 Bargman JM, Thrope KE, Churchill DN for the CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. The importance of residual renal function for survival in patients on peritoneal dialysis [abstract]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 1997;8(Program & Abstracts): 185A.
27. Blake 1999b Blake PG. Advantages and disadvantages of automated peritoneal dialysis compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1999;19(Suppl 2):S121-4. [MEDLINE: 10406505].
28. Brown 2003 Brown EA, Davies SJ, Rutherford S, Meeus F, Borras M, Riegel W, et al.Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: The Euopean APD Outcome Study. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2003;14(11):2948-57. [MEDLINE: 14569106].
29. Brunkhorst 1994 Brunkhorst R, Wrenger E, Krautzig S, Ehlerding G, Mahiout A, Koch KM. Clinical experience with home automated peritoneal dialysis. Kidney International - Supplement 1994;48:S25-30. [MEDLINE: 7700038].
30. Churchill 1998 Churchill DN, Thorpe KE, Nolph KD, Keshaviah R, Oreopoulos DG, Page D. ncreased peritoneal membrane transport is associated with decreased patient and technique survival for continuous peritoneal dialysis patients. The Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 1998;9(7):1285-92. [MEDLINE: 9644640].
31. Diaz-Buxo 1985 Diaz-Buxo JA. CCPD is even better than CAPD. Kidney International - Supplement 1985;17:S26-8. [MEDLINE: 3867797].
32. EBPG 2005 Dombros N, Dratwa M, Feriani M, Gokal R, Heimburger O, Krediet R wt al. European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. 6 Automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005;20 Suppl 9:ix21-ix23. [MEDLINE: 16263747].
33. Flanigan 2001 Flanigan MJ, Rocco MV, Prowant B, Frederick PR, Frankenfield DL. Clinical performance measures: the changing status of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney International 2001;60(6):2377-84. [MEDLINE: 11737613].
34. Golper 1996 Golper TA, Brier ME, Bunke M, Schreiber MJ, Bartlett DK, Hamilton RW, et al.Risk factors for peritonitis in long-term peritoneal dialysis: the Network 9 peritonitis and catheter survival studies. Academic Subcommittee of the Steering Committee of the Network 9 Peritonitis and Catheter Survival Studies. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 1996;28(3):428-36. [MEDLINE: 8804243].
35. Guo 2003 Guo A, Mujais S. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney International - Supplement 2003, (88):S3-12. [MEDLINE: 14870873].
36. Holley 1990a Holley JL, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis is associated with lower rates of catheter infections than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 1990;16(2):133-6. [MEDLINE: 2382649].
37. Holley 2001 Holley JL, Aslam N, Bernardini J, Fried L, Piraino B. The influence of demographic factors andmodality on loss of residual renal function in incident peritoneal dialysis patients. Peritoneal Dialysis International 2001;21(3):302-5. [MEDLINE: 11475347].
38. Howard 1990 Howard RL, Millspaugh J, Teitelbaum I. Adult and pediatric peritonitis rates in a home dialysis program: comparison of continuous ambulatory and continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 1990;16(5):469-72. [MEDLINE: 2239939].
39. Kathuria 1994 Kathuria P, Twardowski ZJ. Automated peritoneal dialysis. In: Gokal R, Khanna R, Krediet R, Nolph K editor(s). Textbook of peritoneal dialysis. 2nd Edition. Kluwer Academic Publications, 1994: 435-65.
40. Macleod 1997 MacLeod A, Grant A, Donaldson C, Khan I, Campbell M, Daly C, et al.Effectiveness and efficiency of methods of dialysis therapy for endstage renal disease: systematic reviews. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 1998;2(5):1-166. [MEDLINE: 9621129].
41. Moist 2000 Moist LM, Port FK, Orzol SM, Young EW, Ostbye T, Wolfe RA, et al.Predictors of loss of residual renal function among new dialysis patients. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2000;11(3): 556-64. [MEDLINE: 10703680].
42. Oo 2005 Oo TN, Roberts TL, Collins AJ. A comparison of peritonitis rates from the United States Renal Data System database: CAPD versus continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis patients. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2005;45(2):372-80. [MEDLINE: 15685516].
43. Troidle 1998 Troidle LK, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Continuous cycler therapy, manual peritoneal dialysis therapy, and peritonitis. Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis 1998;14:137-41. [MEDLINE: 10649711].
44. Twardowski 1983 Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Nolph KD. High volume, low frequency continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney International 1983;23(1):64-70. [MEDLINE: 6834695].
45. UKRA 2002 Gokal R, Davies S, Coles G. Renal Association (UK) Standards Document. Vol. 3rd Edition, Suffolk: Royal College of Physicians of London, 2002.
46. Venkataraman 2002 Venkataraman V, Nolph KD. Utilization of PD modalities: evolution. Seminars in Dialysis 2002;15(6):380-4. [MEDLINE: 12437529].
47. Viglino 1995 Viglino G, Gandolfo C, Vigra G, Cavalli PL. Role of automated peritoneal dialysis within a peritoneal dialysis program. Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis 1995;11:134-8. [MEDLINE: 8534687].
48. Wilson 2002 Wilson J, Nissenson AR. Determinants in APD selection. Seminars in Dialysis 2002;15(6):388-92. [MEDLINE: 12437531].
49. Wrenger 1996 Wrenger E, Krautzig S, Brunkhorst R. Adequacy and quality of life with automated peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1996;16 Suppl 1:S153-7. [MEDLINE: 8728183].