Automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have similar outcomes

Kidney International

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 480-488

  Badve, S V ^a,b   Hawley, C M ^a,b   McDonald, S P ^a,c,d   Mudge, D W ^a,b   Rosman, J B ^a,e   Brown, F G ^a,f   Johnson, D W ^a,b,g  

^a Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^e MIDDLEMORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^f MONASH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

^g PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Automated peritoneal dialysis; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; End stage renal failure; Patient survival; Peritoneal transport status; Technique survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CAUCASIAN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEATH; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEW ZEALAND; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

EID: 38749086116     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002705     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Flanigan MJ, Rocco MV, Prowant B et al. Clinical performance measures: the changing status of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 2377-2384.
2. Johnson DW, Bannister K, McDonald SP et al. Peritoneal dialysis. In: McDonald SP, Excell L (eds). ANZDATA Registry Report 2005. Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry: Adelaide, South Australia, 2006, pp 84-100.
3. Venkataraman V, Nolph KD. Utilization of PD modalities: evolution. Semin Dial 2002; 15: 380-384.
4. Diaz-Buxo JA. Comparison of peritonitis rates with CCPD, manual CAPD, Y-sets, O-sets, UV devices and sterile weld. Adv Perit Dial 1989; 5: 223-226.
5. Holley JL, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis is associated with lower rates of catheter infections than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 16: 133-136.
6. Brunkhorst R, Wrenger E, Krautzig S et al. Clinical experience with home automated peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1994; 48(Suppl): S25-S30.
7. Huang JW, Hung KY, Yen CJ et al. Comparison of infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis patients using either a twin-bag system or automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16: 604-607.
8. Rodriguez-Carmona A, Perez FM, Garcia FT et al. A comparative analysis on the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19: 253-258.
9. Fine RN, Ho M. The role of APD in the management of pediatric patients: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Semin Dial 2002; 15: 427-429.
10. Twardowski ZJ. PET - a simpler approach for determining prescriptions for adequate dialysis therapy. Adv Perit Dial 1990; 6: 186-191.
11. Kumano K, Yamashita A, Sakai T. Optimal number of dialysate exchanges in automated peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial 1993; 9: 110-113.
12. Mujais S, Nolph K, Gokal R et al. Evaluation and management of ultrafiltration problems in peritoneal dialysis. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Ad Hoc Committee on Ultrafiltration Management in Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20(Suppl 4): S5-S21.
13. Wrenger E, Krautzig S, Brunkhorst R. Adequacy and quality of life with automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16(Suppl 1): S153-S157.
14. McComb J, Morton AR, Singer MA et al. Impact of portable APD on patient perception of health-related quality of life. Adv Perit Dial 1997; 13: 137-140.
15. de Wit GA, Merkus MP, Krediet RT et al. A comparison of quality of life of patients on automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 306-312.
16. Schaefer F, Wolf S, Klaus G et al. Higher KT/V urea associated with greater protein catabolic rate and dietary protein intake in children treated with CCPD compared to CAPD. Mid-European Pediatric CPD Study Group (MPCS). Adv Perit Dial 1994; 10: 310-314.
17. Blake P, Burkart JM, Churchill DN et al. Recommended clinical practices for maximizing peritoneal dialysis clearances. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16: 448-456.
18. Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Nolph KD et al. High volume, low frequency continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1983; 23: 64-70.
19. D'Adamo G, Di Napoli A, Amoroso F et al. Collaborative study on peritoneal dialysis (PD) as first dialysis treatment in an Italian region: 1994-2000. G Ital Nefrol 2003; 20: 381-387.
20. Yishak A, Bernardini J, Fried L et al. The outcome of peritonitis in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial 2001; 17: 205-208.
21. Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte Jensen P et al. A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19: 526-533.
22. Hufnagel G, Michel C, Queffeuloe G et al. The influence of automated peritoneal dialysis on the decrease in residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 1224-1228.
23. Rodriguez-Carmona A, Fontan MP. Sodium removal in patients undergoing CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2002; 22: 705-713.
24. Rocco MV, Flanigan MJ, Prowant MB et al. 1996 peritoneal dialysis core indicators study: CAPD prescription and adequacy data (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8: 289A.
25. Rodriguez AM, Diaz NV, Cubillo LP et al. Automated peritoneal dialysis: a Spanish multicenter study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 2335-2340.
26. Hiroshige K, Yuu K, Soejima M et al. Rapid decline of residual renal function in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16: 307-315.
27. Rodriguez-Carmona A, Perez-Fontan M, Garca-Naveiro R et al. Compared time profiles of ultrafiltration, sodium removal, and renal function in incident CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 44: 132-145.
28. Mujais S, Story K. Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes contemporary cohorts. Kidney Int 2006; 70(Suppl 103): S21-S26.
29. de Fijter CW, Oe LP, Nauta JJ et al. Clinical efficacy and morbidity associated with continuous cyclic compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 264-271.
30. Wilson J, Nissenson AR. Determinants in APD selection. Semin Dial 2002; 15: 388-392.
31. Ortega O, Gallar P, Carreno A et al. Peritoneal sodium mass removal in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis: influence on blood pressure control. Am J Nephrol 2001; 21: 189-193.
32. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN. Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: a reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2158-2162.
33. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E et al. Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1307-1320.
34. Gallar P, Ortega O, Carreno A et al. Rate of decline in residual renal function is equal in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20: 803-805.
35. Moist LM, Port FK, Orzol SM et al. Predictors of loss of residual renal function among new dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 556-564.
36. Johnson DW, Mudge DW, Sturtevant JM et al. Predictors of residual renal function decline in new peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23: 276-283.
37. Fischbach M, Terzic J, Menouer S et al. Effects of automated peritoneal dialysis on residual daily urinary volume in children. Adv Perit Dial 2001; 17: 269-273.
38. Hamada C, Osada S, Inoue S et al. Effects of automated peritoneal dialysis on residual urinary volume. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20: 239-241.
39. Holley JL, Aslam N, Bernardini J et al. The influence of demographic factors and modality on loss of residual renal function in incident peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 302-305.
40. D'Agostino Jr RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998; 17: 2265-2281.
41. Polkinghorne KR, McDonald SP, Atkins RC et al. Vascular access and all-cause mortality: a propensity score analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 477-486.
42. Russ GR. The ANZDATA Registry. In: The Twenty-Fourth Annual Report of the ANZDATA Registry. ANZDATA Registry: Adelaide, South Australia, 2001.
43. Twardowski ZJ, Nolph KD, Khanna R. Peritoneal equilibration test. Perit Dial Bull 1987; 7: 138-147.
44. Prentice RL, Williams BJ, Peterson AV. On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 1981; 68: 373-379.
45. Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics 2000; 56: 645-646.
46. Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR. Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 327-333.