Further evaluation of response-independent delivery of preferred stimuli and child compliance

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 665-669

  Normand, Matthew P ^a   Beaulieu, Lauren ^a,b  

^a FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

autism; compliance; fixed time reinforcement schedule; high probability instruction sequence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTISM; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COOPERATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REINFORCEMENT;

AUTISTIC DISORDER; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROBABILITY; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE;

EID: 84856174353     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: 19383703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-665     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ardoin, S. P., Martens, B. K., &, Wolfe, L. A., (1999). Using high-probability instruction sequences with fading to increase student compliance during transitions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 339-351.
2. Ayllon, T., &, Azrin, N. H., (1968). Reinforcer sampling: A technique for increasing the behavior of mental patients. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 13-20.
3. Bullock, C., &, Normand, M. P., (2006). The effects of a high-probability instruction sequence and response-independent reinforcer delivery on child compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 495-499.
4. DeLeon, I. G., &, Iwata, B. A., (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-532.
5. Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., &, Poling, A., (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407-414.
6. Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, P., et al., (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123-141.
7. McComas, J. J., Wacker, D. P., &, Cooper, L. J., (1998). Increasing compliance with medical procedures: Application of the high-probability request procedure to a toddler. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 287-290.
8. Nevin, J. A., (1996). The momentum of compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 535-547.
9. Nevin, J. A., Tota, M. E., Torquato, R. D., &, Shull, R. L., (1990). Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 359-379.
10. Wehby, J. H., &, Hollahan, M. S., (2000). Effects of high-probability requests on the latency to initiate academic tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 259-262.
11. Zarcone, J. R., Iwata, B. A., Hughes, C. E., &, Vollmer, T. R., (1993). Momentum versus extinction effects in the treatment of self-injurious escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 135-136.
12. Zarcone, J. R., Iwata, B. A., Mazaleski, J. L., &, Smith, R. G., (1994). Momentum and extinction effects on self-injurious escape behavior and noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 649-658.
13. Zuluaga, C. A., &, Normand, M. P., (2008). Evaluation of the high-probability instruction sequence with and without programmed reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 453-457.