HiL simulation in biomechanics: A new approach for testing total joint replacements

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 109-119

  Herrmann, Sven ^a   Kaehler, Michael ^a   Souffrant, Robert ^a   Rachholz, Roman ^a   Zierath, János ^a   Kluess, Daniel ^a   Mittelmeier, Wolfram ^a   Woernle, Christoph ^a   Bader, Rainer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dislocation; Hardware in the loop simulation; Instability; Joint simulator; Multibody model; Total joint replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL JOINT; BIOMECHANICAL TESTING; CONTROL PRINCIPLE; HARDWARE IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATION; HIL SIMULATIONS; IMPLANT COMPONENTS; INFLUENCING FACTOR; INSTABILITY EVENTS; INSTABILITY MECHANISMS; JOINT REPLACEMENT; JOINT SIMULATOR; KNEE REPLACEMENT; MULTI-BODY MODELS; PHYSIOLOGICAL LOADS; REVISION SURGERY; RUNNING-IN; SOFT TISSUE; TEST SYSTEMS; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS; TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; DISLOCATIONS (CRYSTALS); HIP PROSTHESES; LOAD TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASMA STABILITY; SIMULATORS; STABILITY; SYNTHETIC APERTURES; TISSUE; TOOLS; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES;

JOINTS (ANATOMY);

ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HARDWARE IN THE LOOP SIMULATION; JOINT INSTABILITY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; ROBOTICS; TISSUE REACTION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION;

EID: 84856100074     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Robbins G.M., Masri B.A., Garbuz D.S., Greidanus N., Duncan C.P. Treatment of hip instability. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 2001, 32(4):593-610.
2. Bozic K.J., Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Ong K., Vail T.P., Berry D.J. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American 2009, 91(1):128-133.
3. Malik A., Maheshwari A., Dorr L.D. Impingement with total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume 2007, 89(8):1832-1842.
4. Bartz R.L., Noble P.C., Kadakia N.R., Tullos H.S. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume 2000, 82(9):1300-1307.
5. Bader R., Scholz R., Steinhauser E., Zimmermann S., Busch R., Mittelmeier W. The influence of head and neck geometry on stability of total hip replacement: a mechanical test study. Acta Orthopaedica 2004, 75(4):415-421.
6. Widmer K.H., Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2004, 22(4):815-821.
7. Bourne R.B., Rorabeck C.H. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. Journal of Arthroplasty 2002, 17(4):17-22.
8. Patel P.D., Potts A., Froimson M.I. The dislocating hip arthroplasty - prevention and treatment. Journal of Arthroplasty 2007, 22(4):86-90.
9. Kwon M.S., Kuskowski M., Mulhall K.J., Macaulay W., Brown T.E., Saleh K.J. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2006, 447:34-38.
10. Mulhall K.J., Ghomrawi H.M., Scully S., Callaghan J.J., Saleh K.J. Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2006, 446:45-50.
11. Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., Shastri S., Jacoby S.M. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2002, 404:7-13.
12. Bozic K.J., Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Ong K., Chiu V., Vail T.P., Rubash H.E., Berry D.J. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2010, 468(1):45-51.
13. Villanueva M., Rios-Luna A., Pereiro J., Fahandez-Saddi H., Perez-Caballer A. Dislocation following total knee arthroplasty: a report of six cases. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 2010, 44(4):438-443.
14. Graichen H., Strauch M., Katzhammer T., Zichner L., Voneisenhart-Rothe R. Ligament instability in total knee arthroplasty-causal analysis. Orthopade 2007, 36(7):650-656.
15. Fehring T.K., Valadie A.L. Knee instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1994, 299:157-162.
16. Berger R.A., Rubash H.E. Rotational instability and malrotation after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 2001, 32(4):639-647.
17. Kaddick C., Wimmer M.A. Hip simulator wear testing according to the newly introduced standard ISO 14242. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 2001, 215(H5):429-442.
18. Walker P.S., Blunn G.W., Broome D.R., Perry J., Watkins A., Sathasivam S., Dewar M.E., Paul J.P. A knee simulating machine for performance evaluation of total knee replacements. Journal of Biomechanics 1997, 30(1):83-89.
19. Bader R., Scholz R., Steinhauser E., Busch R., Mittelmeier W. Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses. Biomedizinische Technik 2004, 49(5):137-144.
20. Kluess D., Martin H., Mittelmeier W., Schmitz K.P., Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Medical Engineering & Physics 2007, 29(4):465-471.
21. Kliewe C., Souffrant R., Kluess D., Woernle C., Brokel K., Bader R. Analytical computational model for the determination of the influence of design and surgical factors on the range of motion of total hip replacements. Biomedizinische Technik 2010, 55(1):47-55.
22. Amstutz H.C., Lodwig R.M., Schurman D.J., Hodgson A.G. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements - comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1975, 111:124-130.
23. Chandler D.R., Glousman R., Hull D., Mcguire P.J., Kim I.S., Clarke I.C., Sarmiento A. Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement - the effects of head and neck geometry. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1982, 166:284-291.
24. Krushell R.J., Burke D.W., Harris W.H. Elevated-rim acetabular components. Effect on range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 1991, 6:S53-S58.
25. Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., Hoeffel D., Harris W.H. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes - an in vitro study. Journal of Arthroplasty 2005, 20(1):11-19.
26. Guyen O., Chen Q.S., Bejui-Hugues J., Berry D.J., An K.N. Unconstrained tripolar hip implants - effect on hip stability. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2007, 455:202-208.
27. Kiguchi K., Yamashita A., Sasaki M., Ueno M., Kobayashi T., Mawatari M., Hotokebuchi T. Control of an artificial-hip-joint simulator to evaluate dislocation. Proceedings of International Conference on Control, Automation and System 2008, 1942-1945.
28. Kiguchi K., Horie T., Yamashita A., Ueno M., Kobayashi T., Mawatari M., Hotokebuchi T. A study of the effect of the femoral head diameter on prosthetic hip joint dislocation using a hip-joint motion simulator. Conference Proceedings - IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2009, 6058-6061.
29. Luger E., Sathasivam S., Walker P.S. Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements. The Knee 1997, 4(1):7-14.
30. DesJardins J.D., Walker P.S., Haider H., Perry J. The use of a force-controlled dynamic knee simulator to quantify the mechanical performance of total knee replacement designs during functional activity. Journal of Biomechanics 2000, 33(10):1231-1242.
31. Stukenborg-Colsman C., Ostermeier S., Wenger K.H., Wirth C.J. Relative motion of a mobile bearing inlay after total knee arthroplasty - dynamic in vitro study. Clinical Biomechanics 2002, 17(1):49-55.
32. Woo S.L.Y., Kanamori A., Zeminski J., Yagi M., Papageorgiou C., Fu F.H. The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon - a cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume 2002, 84(6):907-914.
33. Maletsky L.P., Hillberry B.M. Simulating dynamic activities using a five-axis knee simulator. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2005, 127(1):123-133.
34. Isermann R. Mechatronic Systems 2005, Springer, Berlin.
35. Erdemir A., McLean S., Herzog W., van den Bogert A.J. Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clinical Biomechanics 2007, 22(2):131-154.
36. Lehner, S., Entwicklung und Validierung biomechanischer Computermodelle und deren Einsatz in der Sportwissenschaft, Dissertation, Universität Koblenz-Landau, 2008.
37. Schiehlen W. Computational dynamics: theory and applications of multibody systems. European Journal of Mechanics - A: Solids 2006, 25(4):566-594.
38. Siciliano B., Sciavicco L., Villani L., Oriolo G. Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control 2008, Springer, Berlin.
39. Kluess D., Souffrant R., Mittelmeier W., Wree A., Schmitz K.P., Bader R. A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: modeling and experimental validation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2009, 95(1):23-30.
40. Spitzer V., Ackerman M.J., Scherzinger A.L., Whitlock D. The visible human male: a technical report. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1996, 3(2):118-130.
41. Wu G., Cavanagh P.R. ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. Journal of Biomechanics 1995, 28(10):1257-1260.
42. Wu G., Siegler S., Allard P., Kirtley C., Leardini A., Rosenbaum D., Whittle M., D'Lima D.D., Cristofolini L., Witte H., Schmid O., Stokes H. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion - part 1: ankle, hip, and spine. Journal of Biomechanics 2002, 35(4):543-548.
43. Klein Horsman M.D., Koopman H.F., van der Helm F.C., Prose L.P., Veeger H.E. Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. Clinical Biomechanics 2007, 22(2):239-247.
44. Schuenke M., Schulte E., Schumacher U. Thieme Atlas of Anatomy - General Anatomy and Musculoskeletal System 2005, Thieme, Stuttgart.
45. Winter D.A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement 1990, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
46. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipies in Fortran 90 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. T. Lehmann, K. Schittkowski, T. Spickenreuther, MIQL: A Fortran Code for Convex Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming - User's Guide, Report, Department of Computer Science, University of Bayreuth, 2009.
48. Kaehler M., Woernle C., Bader R. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of constraint elements in mechanical systems. Computational Kinematics 2009, 159-166. Springer, Berlin. A. Kecskeméthy, A. Mueller (Eds.).
49. Brand R.A., Pedersen D.R., Davy D.T., Kotzar G.M., Heiple K.G., Goldberg V.M. Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient. Journal of Arthroplasty 1994, 9(1):45-51.
50. Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Durselen L., Pohl M., Claes L., Haas N.P., Duda G.N. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34(7):883-893.
51. Stansfield B.W., Nicol A.C., Paul J.P., Kelly I.G., Graichen F., Bergmann G. Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb. Journal of Biomechanics 2003, 36(7):929-936.
52. Lu T.W., O'Connor J.J., Taylor S.J.G., Walker P.S. Validation of a lower limb model with in vivo femoral forces telemetered from two subjects. Journal of Biomechanics 1998, 31(1):63-69.
53. Taylor W.R., Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Duda G.N. Tibio-femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2004, 22(3):625-632.
54. Kim H.J., Fernandez J.W., Akbarshahi M., Walter J.P., Fregly B.J., Pandy M.G. Evaluation of predicted knee-joint muscle forces during gait using an instrumented knee implant. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2009, 27(10):1326-1331.
55. Lin Y.C., Walter J.P., Banks S.A., Pandy M.G., Fregly B.J. Simultaneous prediction of muscle and contact forces in the knee during gait. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43(5):945-952.
56. Brand R.A., Pedersen D.R., Friederich J.A. The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiological cross-sectional area. Journal of Biomechanics 1986, 19(8):589-596.
57. Tsirakos D., Baltzopoulos V., Bartlett R. Inverse optimization: functional and physiological considerations related to the force-sharing problem. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 1997, 25(4-5):371-407.
58. Raikova R.T., Prilutsky B.I. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analyses. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34(10):1243-1255.