Analytical computational model for the determination of the influence of design and surgical factors on the range of motion of total hip replacements;Analytisches berechnungsmodell zur bestimmung des einflusses konstruktiver und operativer faktoren auf den bewegungsumfang von hüftendoprothesen

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 47-55

  Kliewe, Christian ^a   Souffrant, Robert ^a   Kluess, Daniel ^a   Woernle, Christoph ^a   Brökel, Klaus ^a   Bader, Rainer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dislocation; Impingement; Numerical simulation; Range of motion; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION/ADDUCTION; ACETABULAR CUP; ANTEVERSION ANGLES; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; DESIGN PARAMETERS; ENDOPROTHESES; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; GEOMETRICAL OPTIMIZATION; GRAPHICAL ILLUSTRATIONS; HEAD AND NECK; IMPLANT COMPONENTS; INTERNAL ROTATIONS; MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTIONS; MULTI-DIRECTIONAL; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; RANGE OF MOTIONS; RESIDUAL RANGE; REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; SUBLUXATION; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ROTATION;

HIP PROSTHESES;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 76849085646     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2010.005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Busch R, Mittelmeier W. Methode zur Evaluierung von Einflußfaktoren auf die Luxationsstabilita ̈t von kun̈stlichen Hüftgelenken. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2004; 49: 137-144.
2. Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Mittelmeier W. Bedeutung des Prothesenkopf-Designs für das Luxationsrisiko nach kun̈stlichem Hüftgelenkersatz - eine biomechanische Analyse. Orthop Praxis 2003; 39: 430-435.
3. Bader R, Steinhauser E, Gradinger R, Willmann G, Mittelmeier W. Computergestützte Bewegungssimulation an Hüftendoprothesen mit Keramik-Keramik-Gleitpaaarung. Analyse der Einflussparameter Implantat-Design und Position. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002; 140: 310-316.
4. Bader R, Steinhauser E, Holzwarth U, Schmitt M, Mittelmeier W. A novel test method for evaluation of the abrasive wear behaviour of total hip stems at the interface between implant surface and bone cement. Proc Inst Mech Eng wHx 2004; 218: 223-230.
5. Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 429: 102-107.
6. ISO/FDIS-14242. Implants for surgery. Wear of total hipjoint prostheses.
7. Kähler M, Souffrant R, Dryba S, Kluess D, Bader R, Woernle C. Hardware-in-the-loop-simulator for testing of total hip endoprostheses. In: ECIFMBE 2008, IFMBE Proceedings 22. Hrsg. Sloten JV, Verdonck P, Nyssen M und Haueisen J. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2008: 1785-1788.
8. Kapandji IA. Funktionelle Anatomie der Gelenke. Stuttgart: Hippokrates Verlag 2002.
9. Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz K, Bader R. Finite-Element-analysis into impingement-related implant failure of total hip replacement. Materials Testing 2007; 49: 330-336.
10. Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 2007; 29: 465-471.
11. Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Acta Orthopaedica 2008; 97: 748-754.
12. Kummer FJ, Shah S, Iyer S, DiCesare PE. The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 509-513.
13. Niethart FU, Pfeil J. Orthopädie. Stuttgart: Hippokrates Verlag 1992.
14. Scifert CF, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ. A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 355: 152-162.
15. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 815-821.
16. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion, part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech 2002; 35: 543.
17. Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH. Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 316: 106-111.
18. Yoshimine F. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech 2006; 39: 1315-1323.