Long-term outcomes after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Current Opinion in Pediatrics

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 68-75

  Kepler, Christopher K ^a   Meredith, Dennis S ^a   Green, Daniel W ^a   Widmann, Roger F ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; disc degeneration; long term follow up; sagittal balance; spinal fusion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT HEALTH; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856093329     PISSN: 10408703     EISSN: 1531698X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834ec982     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Parent S, Newton PO, Wenger DR. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: etiology, anatomy, natural history, and bracing. Instr Course Lect 2005; 54:529-536.
2. Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, Ogilvie JW, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19:1745-1751. (Pubitemid 24314184)
3. Bastian L, Lange U, Knop C, et al. Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 2001; 10:295-300. (Pubitemid 32762773)
4. Rao RD, David KS, Wang M. Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using tapered cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:2772-2776. (Pubitemid 43011038)
5. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962; 44-A:591-610.
6. La Grone MO. Loss of lumbar lordosis. A complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988; 19:383-393.
7. Ploumis A, Liu H, Mehbod AA, et al. A correlation of radiographic and functional measurements in adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:1581-1584. This study suggests that residual scoliotic curves which displace the head more than 5cm from the midline do contribute to worse results. This establishes a threshold above which residual scoliotic curves may adversely influence postoperative results.
8. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 227:10-23. (Pubitemid 18054616)
9. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Berteaux D, et al. Osteosynthesis of thoraco-lumbar spine fractures with metal plates screwed through the vertebral pedicles. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 1976; 15:2-16.
10. Hitchon PW, Brenton MD, Black AG, et al. In vitro biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws, sublaminar hooks, and sublaminar cables. J Neurosurg 2003; 99:104-109. (Pubitemid 36750445)
11. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:2040-2048. (Pubitemid 40202276)
12. Asghar J, Samdani AF, Pahys JM, et al. Computed tomography evaluation of rotation correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of an all pedicle screw construct versus a hook-rod system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:804-807. Pedicle screw instrumentation is thought to provide better curve correction compared with older types of instrumentation; this study quantifies the improvement in rotational correction compared with hook-rod systems.
13. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72:403-408. (Pubitemid 20151924)
14. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:63-69. (Pubitemid 36070775)
15. Westrick ER, Ward WT. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-year to 20-year evidence-based surgical results. J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31:S61-S68. This study provides a good review of the literature describing long-term follow-up after fusion for AIS.
16. Takayama K, Nakamura H, Matsuda H. Low back pain in patients treated surgically for scoliosis: longer than sixteen-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:2198-2204. This study with an average follow-up of 21 years demonstrated no difference in rates of low back pain in patients who had undergone fusion for AIS but did find greater rates of back pain in those patients with positive sagittal balance.
17. Takayama K, Nakamura H, Matsuda H. Quality of life in patients treated surgically for scoliosis: longer than sixteen-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:2179-2184. At follow-up of 21 years, this study demonstrated few limitations in function in patients who had undergone fusion for adolescent scoliosis: SF-36 scores were not significantly different from age-matched individuals in the general population.
18. Mueller FJ, Gluch H. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with arthrodesis and posterior titanium instrumentation: 8 to 12 years follow up without late infection. Scoliosis 2009; 4:16. This study reported the average correction of the scoliotic curve but also reported a relatively high rate of reoperation (14%).
19. Green DW, Lawhorne TW 3rd, Widmann RF, et al. Long term MRI follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2011; 36:1948-1954. This study establishes the incidence, clinical relevance and pattern of disc degeneration after fusion for AIS based on preoperative and postoperative MRI. In contrast to previous assumptions that the transitional (adjacent) disc would degenerate first, this study showed accelerated (but most often asymptomatic) degeneration of the L5-S1 disc regardless of the distal level fused.
20. Chang MS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Predicting the outcome of selective thoracic fusion in false double major lumbar 'C' cases with five- to twenty-fouryear follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:2128-2133. This study established the importance of maintenance of lumbar lordosis in patient outcomes. The magnitude of correction of the scoliotic curve was not a significant determinant of outcome.
21. Kostuik JP, Maurais GR, Richardson WJ, et al. Combined single stage anterior and posterior osteotomy for correction of iatrogenic lumbar kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13:257-266.
22. Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, et al. Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis to L5 in adults: the fate of the L5-S1 disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:2122-2131. (Pubitemid 37140202)
23. Bartie BJ, Lonstein JE, Winter RB. Long-term follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who had Harrington instrumentation and fusion to the lower lumbar vertebrae: is low back pain a problem? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:E873-E878. Whereas patients treated with fusion utilizing pedicle screw fixation have been demonstrated to have rates of low back pain similar to the general population, this study reports elevated rates of back pain in patients treated with an early form of spinal instrumentation, Harrington rods.
24. Kelly DM, McCarthy RE, McCullough FL, et al. Long-term outcomes of anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:194-198. In agreement with the larger Green et al. study, this study confirms that there is little correlation between radiographic evidence of disc degeneration at unfused levels and symptoms of back pain.