Quality of life in patients treated surgically for scoliosis: Longer than sixteen-year follow-up

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 20, 2009, Pages 2179-2184

  Takayama, Kazushi ^a   Nakamura, Hiroaki ^a   Matsuda, Hideki ^b  

^a OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Ishikiriseiki Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Long term outcome; Quality of life; Scoliosis; Surgical treatment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERVIEW; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SPINAL FUSION; SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349739587     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abf684     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Danielsson AJ. What impact does spinal deformity correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis make on quality of life? Spine 2007;32:S101-8.
2. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002;27:2046-2051 (Pubitemid 35052554)
3. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:1956-1965
4. Newton PO, Parent S, Marks M, et al. Prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive scoliosis patients surgically treated with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation. Spine 2005;30(suppl):100-195 (Pubitemid 41292211)
5. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, et al. Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:2303-2309 (Pubitemid 37499638)
6. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 2001;10:278-288 (Pubitemid 32762771)
7. Remes V, Helenius I, Schlenzka D, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) or Universal Spine System (USS) instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): comparison of mid-term clinical, functional, and radiologic outcomes. Spine 2004;29:2024-2030 (Pubitemid 40202273)
8. Andersen MO, Christensen SB, Thomsen K. Outcome at 10 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:350-354 (Pubitemid 43214778)
9. Lonner BS, Kondrachov D, Siddiqi F, et al. Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1022-1034
10. Mariconda M, Galasso O, Barca P, et al. Minimum 20-year follow-up results of Harrington rod fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2005;14:854-861 (Pubitemid 41789824)
11. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Safety and efficacy of Isola instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: two- to 12-year follow-up. Spine 2004;29:2013-2023 (Pubitemid 40202272)
12. Hurford RK Jr, Lenke LG, Lee SS, et al. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes of dual-rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison with single-rod constructs. Spine 2006;31:2322-2328
13. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:291-298 (Pubitemid 43214769)
14. Gotze C, Liljenqvist UR, Slomka A, et al. Quality of life and back pain: outcome 16.7 years after Harrington instrumentation. Spine 2002;27:1456-63; discussion 1463-1464 (Pubitemid 34747837)
15. Padua R, Padua S, Aulisa L, et al. Patient outcomes after Harrington instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: a 15 to 28 year evaluation. Spine 2001;26:1268-1273 (Pubitemid 32520503)
16. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, et al. Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 78 patients. Spine 2002;27:176-180 (Pubitemid 34215558)
17. Niemeyer T, Bovingloh AS, Grieb S, et al. Low back pain after spinal fusion and Harrington instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 2005;29:47-50. (Pubitemid 40248291)
18. Benli IT, Ates B, Akalin S, et al. Minimum 10 years follow-up surgical results of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with TSRH instrumentation. Eur Spine J 2007;16:381-391 (Pubitemid 46440176)
19. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D, et al. Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002;27:E87-91.
20. Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, et al. Evaluation of postoperative residual spinal deformity and patient outcome in idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan using the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument. Spine 2007;32:550-554 (Pubitemid 46398921)
21. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Spine 2001;26:1449-1456
22. Orvomaa E, Hiilesmaa V, Poussa M, et al. Pregnancy and delivery in patients operated by the Harrington method for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1997;6:304-307 (Pubitemid 27471151)
23. Betz RR, Bunnell WP, Lambrecht-Mulier E, et al. Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:90-96
24. Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A. Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 1983;8:576-584 (Pubitemid 14244159)
25. Kopenhager T. A review of 50 pregnant patients with kyphoscoliosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977;84:585-587
26. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcomes Instrument. Spine 2000;25:2381-2386
27. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-69 (Pubitemid 36070775)
28. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-73 (Pubitemid 36070776)
29. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28:74-78 (Pubitemid 36070777)
30. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005;30:2024-2029 (Pubitemid 41363744)
31. Bjerkreim I, Steen H, Brox JI. Idiopathic scoliosis treated with cotrel-dubousset instrumentation evaluation 10 years after surgery. Spine 2007;32:2103-2110 (Pubitemid 47359617)
32. Boos N, Dolan LA, Stuart L, et al. Long-term clinical and radiographic Results of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Iowa Orthop J 2007;27:40-46
33. Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, et al. Why we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and avoid for our patients. Paper presented at: 2nd International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities; January 13-14, 2005; Milan, Italy.
34. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicentre study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-1440
35. Wilson PL, Newton PO, Wenger DR, et al. A multicentre study analysing the relationship of a standardised idiopathic scoliosis and the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument. Spine 2002;27:2036-2040
36. Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine 2006;26:3027-3038 (Pubitemid 46005893)