Using word identification fluency to monitor first-grade reading development

Exceptional Children

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 201-220

  Zumeta, Rebecca O ^a   Compton, Donald L ^a   Fuchs, Lynn S ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856066206     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440291207800204     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from triannual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37, 109-125.
2. Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Katz, R., Fien, H., Seelety, J. R., Kamen'enui, E. J., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low-performing, high-poverty schools. School Psychology Review, 37, 18-37.
3. Brownell, M. T., Sindelar, P. T., Kiely, M. T., & Danielson, L. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357-377.
4. Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M. S., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163-176. doi:10.1177/00222194 08326219
5. Clemens, N. H. (2009). Toward consensus on first grade CBM measures (unpublished doctoral dissertation), Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
6. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., Gilbert, J. K., Barquero, L. A.,... Crouch, R. C. (2010). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 327-340. doi:10.1037/a0018448
7. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Bryant, J. D. (2006) Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394-409. doi:l0.1037/0022-0663.98.2.394 (Pubitemid 43892975)
8. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 59, 219-232.
10. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184-192. doi: 10.1177/00224669030370030801 (Pubitemid 37364728)
11. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45. (Pubitemid 13243123)
12. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Beeler, T., Winikates, D., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). Early interventions for children with reading problems: Study designs and preliminary findings. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 63-71.
13. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N. J.,.. O'Connor, R. (2001). Is reading important in reading readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251-267. doi:l 0.1037/0022-0663.93.2.251
14. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L. & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of curriculum-based measurement evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 449-460.
15. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Progress monitoring with Letter-sound fluency: Technical data. Available from L. S. Fuchs, 328 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7-21. (Pubitemid 40465196)
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research. 83, 103-111.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. F., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
19. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from http://dibels. uoregon.edu/
20. Good, R. H., III, Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance of decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503.4
21. Healy, K. D. (2007). Word identification fluency and nonsense word fluency as predictors of reading fluency in first grade. Dissertation Abstracts International, 69(01), A.
22. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
23. La Berge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74) 90015-2
24. Manzo, K. K. (2005). National clout of DIBELS test draws scrutiny. Education Week, 25, 11-12.
25. Meisinger, E. B., Bloom, J. S., & Hynd, G. W. (2010). Reading fluency: Implications for the assessment of children with reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0031-z
26. M Plus (Version 6.1) [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
27. National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI: A closer look at response to intervention. Retrieved from http://www.cldinternational.org/Articles/rtiessen tialcomponents.pdf
28. Nimon, K., Nathans, L. L., & Henson, R. K. (2010, February). Commonality analysis: A promising strategy for understanding regression effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
29. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Schatschneider, C., Wagner, R. K., & Crawford, E. C. (2008). The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 308-315. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.005
31. Stage, S. A., & Jacobsen, M. D. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407-419.
32. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, CA. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
33. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvin, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in your children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.579
34. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 137-146. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00070
35. Walker, H. M., & Lev, J. (1953). Statistical inference. New York, NY: Holt & Co.
36. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery list-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
37. Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duwuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. New York, NY: Touchstone Science Associates.