Latest Generation, Wide-Angle, High-Definition Colonoscopes Increase Adenoma Detection Rate

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 155-159

  Adler, Andreas ^a   Aminalai, Alireza ^b   Aschenbeck, Jens ^b   Drossel, Rolf ^b   Mayr, Michael ^b   Scheel, Mathias ^b   Schröder, Andreas ^b   Yenerim, Timur ^a   Wiedenmann, Bertram ^a   Gauger, Ulrich ^a   Roll, Stephanie ^a   Rösch, Thomas ^c  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Private gastroenterology practice   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR); BECOP 6; Colon Cancer; CRC; Early Detection; Screening Trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HIGH DEFINITION TELEVISION COLONOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADENOMA; AGED; BERLIN; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84856031269     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Whitlock E.P., Lin J.S., Liles E., et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:638-658.
2. Bretagne J.F., Ponchon T. Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy?. Endoscopy 2008, 40:523-528.
3. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:2533-2541.
4. Sieg A., Theilmeier A. Results of coloscopy screening in 2005: an internet-based documentation. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2006, 131:379-383.
5. Kanna B., Schori M., Azeez S., et al. Colorectal tumors within an urban minority population in New York City. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22:835-840.
6. Lieberman D.A., Prindiville S., Weiss D.G., et al. Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2003, 290:2959-2967.
7. Hüppe D., Hartmann H., Felten G., et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in a community-based study. Z Gastroenterol 2008, 46:193-200.
8. Regula J., Rupinski M., Kraszewska E., et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:1863-1872.
9. Rainis T., Keren D., Goldstein O., et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of colonoscopy in Israeli patients in an open access referral system. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007, 41:394-399.
10. Byeon J.S., Yang S.K., Kim T.I., et al. Colorectal neoplasm in asymptomatic Asians: a prospective multinational multicenter colonoscopy survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:1015-1022.
11. Deenadayalu V.P., Chadalawada V., Rex D.K. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:2138-2142.
12. Rex D.K., Helbig C.C. High yield of small and flat adenomas with high definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007, 133:42-47.
13. Adler A., Pohl H., Papanikolaou I.S., et al. A prospective randomized study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does NBI induce a learning effect?. Gut 2008, 57:59-64.
14. Inoue T., Murano M., Murano N., et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2008, 43:45-50.
15. Adler A., Aschenbeck J., Yenerim T., et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2009, 136:410-416.
16. Pohl J., Lotterer E., Balzer C., et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 2009, 58:73-78.
17. Aminalai A., Rösch T., Aschenbeck J., et al. Colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5): live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:2383-2388.
18. Hoffman A., Sar F., Goetz M., et al. High definition colonoscopy combined with i-Scan is superior in the detection of colorectal neoplasias compared with standard video colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2010, 42:827-833.
19. Adler A., Lieberman D., Aminalai A., et al. Does case volume determine screening colonoscopy quality: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates from 12134 screening colonoscopies (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 3, BECOP-3). Gut 2011, (accepted manuscript).
20. Adler A., Lieberman D., Aminalai A., et al. A prospective audit of National Registry Data on screening colonoscopy: procedural complications are underreported (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 4, BECOP-4). Gut 2011, (accepted manuscript).
21. Pellisé M., Fernández-Esparrach G., Cárdenas A., et al. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1062-1068.
22. Tribonias G., Theodoropoulou A., Konstantinidis K., et al. Comparison of standard versus high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2010, 12:260-266.
23. Subramanian V., Mannath J., Hawkey C.J., et al. High definition colonoscopy vs standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2011, 43:499-505.
24. Kaminski M.F., Regula J., Kraszewska E., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1795-1803.
25. Rodney W.M., Dabov G., Orientale E., et al. Sedation associated with a more complete colonoscopy. J Fam Pract 1993, 36:394-400.
26. Wang A., Hoda K.M., Holub J.L., et al. Does level of sedation impact detection of advanced neoplasia?. Dig Dis Sci 2010, 55:2337-2343.
27. Parra V., Watanabe J., Nago A., et al. Sedation used during colonoscopies at the Peruvian-Japanese policlinic: their relationship with quality indicators [Spanish]. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2010, 30:40-45.
28. Paspatis G.A., Tribonias G., Manolaraki M.M., et al. Deep sedation compared with moderate sedation in polyp detection during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2011, 13:e137-e144.
29. Riphaus A., Wehrmann T., Weber B., et al. Sektion Enoskopie im Auftrag der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs-und Stoffwechselerkrankungen e. V. (DGVS); Bundesverband Niedergelassener Gastroenterologen Deuschlands e. V. (Bng); Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Endoskopie und Sonographie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV); Deutsche Morbus Crohn/Colitis ulcerosa Vereinigung e. V. (DCCV); Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endoskopie-Assistenzpersonal (DEGEA); Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI); Gesellschaft für Recht und Politik im Gesundheitswesen (GPRG) [S3-guidelines: sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy]. Z Gastroenterol 2008, 46:1298-1330.
30. Accessed June 2011. http://www.zi-berlin.de/cms/fileadmin/images/content/PDFs_alle/Darmkrebsfrueherk_Bericht.pdf.