Teaching design thinking: Expanding horizons in design education

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 31, Issue , 2012, Pages 162-166

  Melles, Gavin ^a   Howard, Zaana ^a   Thompson Whitesidec, Scott ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Design education; Design thinking; Transnational education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856025735     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.035     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bootcamp Bootleg D.School. 2010. Available at http://dschool.typepad.com/ files/bootcampbootleg2010v2slim-1.pdf . Hassno Platner & Institute of Design at Standford University
2. Bourdieu, P. 1990, The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
3. Brown, T. 2008, 'Design thinking', Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 84-92, 141
4. Brown, B.T. & Wyatt, J. 2010, 'Design thinking for social innovation', Stanford Social Innovation Review, vol. winter, pp. 30-35
5. Chiasson, P. 2001, Peirce's pragmatism: the design for thinking. Rodopi, Amsterdam, Atlanta, GA
6. Cross, N. 2006, Designerly ways of knowing, London, Springer
7. Duncan, A.K. & Breslin, M.A. 2009, 'Innovating health care delivery: the design of health services', Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 30, no. 2/3, pp. 13-20
8. Dunne, D. & Martin, R. 2006, 'Design thinking and how it will change management education: an interview and discussion', Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 512-523
9. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D. & Leifer, L. 2006, 'Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning', IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 65-92
10. Holloway, M. 2009, 'How tangible is your strategy? How design thinking can turn your strategy into reality', Journal of Business Strategy, 30(2/3), pp. 50-56
11. Khisty, C. & Arslan, T. 2005, 'Possibilities of steering the transportation planning process in the face of bounded rationality and unbounded uncertainty', Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 77-92
12. Lawson, B. 2005, How designers think: the design process demystified, 4th Edition. Architectural Press, Oxford
13. Martin, R. 2009, The design of business: why eesign thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press, Boston, Massachusetts
14. Melles, G. 2008, 'An enlarged pragmatist inquiry paradigm for methodological pluralism in academic design research', Artifact, vol. 2, pp. 3-11
15. Melles, G. 2010, 'Curriculum design thinking: a new name for old ways of thinking and practice?', Proceedings of the DTRS8 Conference, UTS Sydney, pp. 299-308
16. 'Problem solving through design', New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2003 (95), pp. 39-44
17. Rittel, H. W. & Webber, M.M. 1973, 'Dilemmas in a general theory of planning', Policy Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155-175
18. Romme, A.G. 2003, 'Making a difference: organization as design', Organization Science, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 558-573
19. Rylander, A. 2009, 'Design thinking as knowledge work: epsitemological foundations and practical implications', Design Management Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7-19
20. Simon, H.S. 1996, The Sciences of the Artificial, Massachusetts, 3rd Edition, MIT Press
21. Spector, T. 2004, 'Pragmatism for architects', Contemporary Pragmatism, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 133-149
22. Wiggins, G.P. & McTighe, J. 2005, Understanding by design, 2nd Edition, Alexandria, AScD
23. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. & Evenson, S. 2007, Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems-CHI '07, pp. 493-502. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press