Acquiring psychomotor skills in operative dentistry: Do innate ability and motivation matter?

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Suksudaj, N ^a,b   Townsend, G C ^b   Kaidonis, J ^b   Lekkas, D ^b   Winning, T A ^b  

^a THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Innate ability; Motivation; Psychomotor skills; Skill acquisition; Skill learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APTITUDE TEST; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTAL SURGERY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; APTITUDE TESTS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DENTISTRY, OPERATIVE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STUDENTS, DENTAL;

EID: 84856012701     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00696.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ackerman PL. Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: cognitive abilities and information processing. J Exp Psychol Gen 1988: 117: 288-318.
2. Ackerman PL, Cianciolo AT. Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. J Exp Psychol Appl 2000: 6: 259-290.
3. Kanfer R, Ackerman PL. Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. J Appl Psychol 1989: 74: 657-690.
4. Yeo G, Neal A. A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. J Appl Psychol 2004: 89: 231-247.
5. Brydges R, Carnahan H, Backstein D, Dubrowski A. Application of motor learning principles to complex surgical tasks: searching for the optimal practice schedule. J Mot Behav 2007: 39: 40-48.
6. Dubrowski A, Backstein D, Abughaduma R, Leidl D, Carnahan H. The influence of practice schedules in the learning of a complex bone-plating surgical task. Am J Surg 2005: 190: 359-363.
7. Schmidt RA, Lee T. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 4th edn. Illinois: Human Kinetics, 2005.
8. Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human performance. CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1967.
9. Keehner M, Lippa Y, Montello D, Tendick F, Hegarty M. Learning a spatial skill for surgery: how the contributions of abilities change with practice. Appl Cogn Psychol 2006: 20: 487-503.
10. Gansky SA, Pritchard H, Kahl E, et al. Reliability and validity of a manual dexterity test to predict preclinical grades. J Dent Educ 2004: 68: 985-994.
11. Oudshoorn W. The utility of Canadian DAT perceptual ability and carving dexterity scores as predictors of psychomotor performance in first-year operative dentistry. J Dent Educ 2003: 67: 1201-1208.
12. Heintze U, Radeborg K, Bengtsson H, Stenlaas A. Assessment and evaluation of individual prerequisites for dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2004: 8: 152-160.
13. Gray SA, Deem LP. Predicting student performance in preclinical technique courses using the theory of ability determinants of skilled performance. J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 721-727.
14. Gray SA, Deem LP, Straja SR. Are traditional cognitive tests useful in predicting clinical success? J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 1241-1245.
15. Lundergan WP, Soderstrom EJ, Chambers DW. Tweezer dexterity aptitude of dental students. J Dent Educ 2007: 71: 1090-1097.
16. de Andres AG, Sanchez E, Hidalgo JJ, Diaz MJ. Appraisal of psychomotor skills of dental students at University Complutense of Madrid. Eur J Dent Educ 2004: 8: 24-30.
17. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 2006: 119: 166.e7-166.e16.
18. Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ 2007: 41: 737-745.
19. Park SE, Da Silva JD, Barnes JL, Susarla SM, Howell TH. Predicting dental school performance based on prior dental experience and exposure. Eur J Dent Educ 2010: 14: 1-6.
20. Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). [Internet], 2001. Available at: (Last accessed 7 March 2011).
21. Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess 1996: 8: 350-352.
22. McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen V. Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 1989: 60: 48-58.
23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977: 33: 159-174.
24. Kleinbaum DG, Klien M. Logistic regression: a self-learning text, 2nd edn. New York: Springer, 2002.
25. Boyle A, Santelli J. Assessing psychomotor skills: the role of the Crawford small parts dexterity test as a screening instrument. J Dent Educ 1986: 50: 176-179.
26. Walcott A, Knight G, Charlick R. Waxing tests as predictors of students' performance in preclinical dentistry. J Dent Educ 1986: 50: 716-721.
27. Gillet D, Quinton A, Jeannel A. Is there a link between writing ability, drawing aptitude and manual skills of dental students? Eur J Dent Educ 2002: 6: 69-73.
28. Giuliani M, Lajolo C, Clemente L, et al. Is manual dexterity essential in the selection of dental students? Br Dent J 2007: 203: 149-155.
29. Risucci DA. Visual spatial perception and surgical competence. Am J Surg 2002: 184: 291-295.
30. Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Caminiti MF, Anastakis DJ, Grober ED, Reznick RK. Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. Surgery 2003: 134: 750-757.
31. Hudson L. Contrary imaginations: a psychological study of the English schoolboy. London: Methuen, 1966.
32. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR. The Cambridge handbook of expertise performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
33. Yarrow K, Brown P, Krakauer JW. Inside the brain of an elite athlete: the neural processes that support high achievement in sports. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009: 10: 585-596.
34. Friedl R, Hoppler H, Ecard K, et al. Multimedia-driven teaching significantly improves students' performance when compared with a print medium. Ann Thorac Surg 2006: 81: 1760-1766.
35. Grant H, Dweck CS. Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003: 85: 541-553.
36. Yeo G, Neal A. Subjective cognitive effort: a model of states, traits, and time. J Appl Psychol 2008: 93: 617-631.
37. Mangels JA, Butterfield B, Lamb J, Good C, Dweck CS. Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2006: 1: 75-86.
38. Elliot AJ, Devine PG. On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: dissonance as psychological discomfort. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994: 67: 382-394.
39. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 2008: 15: 988-994.
40. Sohn YW, Doane SM, Garrison T. The impact of individual differences and learning context on strategic skill acquisition and transfer. Learn Individ Differ 2006: 16: 13-30.
41. Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J. Manual for Raven's advanced progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Texas: Harcourt Assessment, 1998.
42. Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C. A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test - different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn 1995: 28: 39-58.
43. Smith A. Symbol digit modalities test manual. CA: Western Psychological Services, 1982.
44. Burns NR, Nettelbeck T. Inspection time and speed of processing: sex differences on perceptual speed but not IT. Pers Individ Dif 2005: 39: 439-446.
45. MacQuarrie TW. Manual of directions: MacQuarrie test for mechanical ability. CA: Test Bureau, 1953.
46. O'Connor J. Instructions for the O'Connor tweezer dexterity test. IN: Lafayette Instrument, 1998.