Global response approximation with radial basis functions

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 407-424

  Fang, Hongbing ^a   Horstemeyer, Mark F ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented; Compactly supported; Global response; Metamodeling; Radial basis functions; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; FUNCTION EVALUATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL METHODS; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING;

AUGMENTED; COMPACTLY SUPPORTED; GLOBAL RESPONSE; METAMODELING; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS;

EID: 33646426415     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052150500422294     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alexandrov, N.M., Dennis, J.E., Lewis, R.M. and Torczon, V., A trust region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization. Struct. Optim., 1998, 15, 16-23.
2. Branin, F.K., A widely convergent method for finding multiple solutions of simultaneous nonlinear equations. IBM J. Res. Dev., 1972, 16, 504-522.
3. Fang, H. and Horstemeyer, M.F., HiPPO: an object-oriented framework for general-purpose design optimization. J. Aerospace Comput., Information, Communication (AIAA), 2005, 2(12), 490-506.
4. Fang, H., Rais-Rohani, M. and Horstemeyer, M.F., Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization with radial basis functions, in Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Paper No. AIAA-2004-4487, 2004, Albany, NY.
5. Goldstein, A.A. and Price, I.F., On descent from local minima. Math. Comput., 1971, 25, 571.
6. Griewank, A.O., Generalized descent for global optimization. J. Optim. Theory Applic., 1981, 34, 11-39.
7. Hardy, R.L., Multiquadratic equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. J. Geophys., 1971, 76, 1905-1915.
8. Hussain, M.F., Barton, R.R. and Joshi, S.B., Metamodeling: radial basis functions versus polynomials. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2002, 138(1), 142-154.
9. Jin, R., Chen, W. and Simpson, T.W., Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 2001, 23(1), 1-13.
10. Krishnamurthy, T., Response surface approximation with augmented and compactly supported radial basis functions. in 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Paper No. AIAA-2003-1748, 2003, Norfolk, VA.
11. Montgomery, D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 2001 (John Wiley: New York).
12. Rais-Rohani, M. and Singh, M.N., Comparison of global and local response surface techniques in reliability-based optimization of composite structures. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 2004, 26(5), 333-345.
13. Rodriguez, J., Renaud, J.E. and Watson, L.T., Trust region augmented Lagrangian methods for sequential response surface approximation and optimization, in Proceedings of DETC '97 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Paper No. DETC97/DAC3773, 1997, Sacramento, CA.
14. Taguchi, G., Taguchi Method - Design of Experiments, Quality Engineering Series Vol. 4, 1993 (Japanese Standards Association, ASI Press: Tokyo).
15. Wang, B.P., Parameter optimization in multiquadric response surface approximation. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 2004, 26(3/4), 219-223.
16. Wang, G., Dong, Z. and Aitchison, P., Adaptive response surface method - a global optimization scheme for approximation-based design problems. Eng. Optim., 2001, 33, 707-734.
17. Wendland, H., On the smoothness of positive definite and radial functions. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 1999, 101, 177-188.
18. Wu, Z., Compactly supported positive definite radial function. Adv. Comput. Math., 1995, 4, 283-292.
19. Yang, B.S., Yeun, Y.S. and Ruy, W.S., Managing approximation models in multi-objective optimization. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 2002, 24(2), 141-156.