Regulatory toxicology

EXCLI Journal

Volumn 10, Issue , 2011, Pages 138-139

  Bolt, H M ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGEN; METHYLMERCURY;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; EDITORIAL; HORMESIS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MICRONUCLEUS TEST; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; SKIN ALLERGY; TOXICITY TESTING; TOXICOLOGY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84855805940     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16112156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Ahuja V, Wanner R, Platzek T, Stahlmann R. Appraisal of the sensitising potential of orally and dermally administered mercapto-benzothiazole by a biphasic protocol of the local lymph node assay. Arch Toxicol 2009; 83:933-9.
2. Bolt HM, Selinski S, Dannappel D, Blasz-kewicz M, Golka K. Re-investigation of the concordance of human NAT2 phenotypes and genotypes. Arch Toxicol 2005;79:196-200.
3. Bolt HM, Marchan R, Hengstler JG. Low-dose extrapolation in toxicology: an old controversy revisited. Arch Toxicol 83:197-8. Comment in Arch Toxicol 2009;83:639-40.
4. Calabrese EJ. The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment. Arch Toxicol 2009a;83:203-25.
5. Calabrese EJ. Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted. Arch Toxicol 2009b;83:227-47.
6. Gundert-Remy U, Bernauer U, Madle S, Oberemm A, Schulte A, Richter-Reichhelm HB. Letter to the editor: a regulatory view on the discussion on the role of alternative methods in the risk assessment of chemicals in the context of REACH. Arch Toxicol 2009;83:9-10. Comment in Arch Toxicol 2009;82:211-36.
7. Heng BC, Richards M, Shu Y, Gribbon P. Induced pluripotent stem cells: a new tool for toxicology screening? Arch Toxicol 2009;83:641-4.
8. Hengstler JG, Bogdanffy MS, Bolt HM, Oesch F. Challenging dogma: thresholds for genotoxic carcinogens? The case of vinyl acetate. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2003; 43:485-520.
9. Hothorn LA, Gerhard D. Statistical evalua-tion of the in vivo micronucleus assay. Arch Toxicol 2009;83:625-34.
10. Keller D, Krauledat M, Scheel J. Feasibility study to support a threshold of sensitization concern concept in risk assessment based on human data. Arch Toxicol 2009;83: 1049-60.
11. Oesch F, Hengstler JG, Arand M. Detoxi-cation strategy of epoxide hydrolase-the basis for a novel threshold for definable genotoxic carcinogens. Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med 2004;2:21-6.
12. Pesch B, Spickenheuer A, Taeger D, Brün-ing T. Low-dose extrapolation in toxicol-ogy: an old controversy revisited. Arch Toxicol 2009;83:639-40. Comment in Arch Toxicol 2009;83:197-8.
13. Vanhaecke T, Snykers S, Rogiers V, Garthoff B, Castell JV, Hengstler JG. EU research activities in alternative testing stra-tegies: current status and future perspec-tives. Arch Toxicol 2009;83:1037-42.
14. Yamamoto R, Shima M. Estimation of hu-man maximum tolerable intake for methyl-mercury based on two recent studies in monkeys. Arch Toxicol 2009;83:1043-8.