User evaluation of mobile augmented reality scenarios

Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 29-47

  Olsson, Thomas ^a   Kärkkäinen, Tuula ^a   Lagerstam, Else ^a   Ventä Olkkonen, Leena ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; mobile services; online survey; user acceptance; user expectations; user research

Indexed keywords

MOBILE SERVICE; ONLINE SURVEYS; USER ACCEPTANCE; USER EXPECTATIONS; USER RESEARCH;

AUGMENTED REALITY; RISK PERCEPTION; SURVEYS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84855757091     PISSN: 18761364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/AIS-2011-0127     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. M. Aittala, Inverse lighting and photorealistic rendering for augmented reality, The Visual Computer 26(6-8), 669-678.
2. L. Arhippainen, Studying user experience: Issues and problems of mobile service -Case Adamos: User experience (im)possible to catch?, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oulu, 2009.
3. R. Azuma, Tracking requirements for augmented reality, Communications of the ACM 36(7) (1993), 50-51.
4. J. Burrell, G. Gay, K. Kubo and N. Farina, Context-aware computing: A test case, in: Proc. of UbiComp 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2498, 2002, pp. 647-653.
5. A.D. Cheok, X. Yang, Z.Z. Ying, M. Billinghurst and H. Kato, Touch-Space: Mixed reality game space based on ubiquitous, tangible, and social computing, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6(5-6) (2002), 430-442.
6. A. Dey, Understanding and using context, Personal and Ubiquituos Computing 5(1) (2001), 4-7.
7. A. Dünser, R. Grasset and M. Billinghurst, A survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies, in: Proc. of International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM SIGGRAPH (2008), Article No.: 5.
8. K. Finstad, Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales, Journal of Usability Studies 5(3) (2010), 104-110.
9. J.L. Gabbard and E. Swan, Usability engineering for augmented reality: Employing user-based studies to inform design, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(3) (2008), 513-524.
10. M. Gandy, R. Catrambone, B. MacIntyre, C. Alvarez, E. Eiriksdottir, M. Hilimire, B. Davidson and A.C. McLaughlin, Experience with an AR evaluation test bed: Presence, performance, and physiological measurement, in: Proc. of Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) 2010, pp. 127-136.
11. T. Gleue and P. Dähne, Design and implementation of a mobile device for outdoor augmented reality in the ARCHEOGUIDE project, in: Proc. of 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage, 2001, pp. 161-168.
12. M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky, User experience -A research agenda, Behaviour and Information Technology 25(2) (2006), 91-97.
13. M. Hassenzahl, M. Schöbel and T. Trautmann, How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: The role of regulatory focus, Interacting with Computers 20(4-5) (2008), 473-479.
14. I. Herbst, A.K. Braun, R. McCall and W. Broll, TimeWarp: Interactive time travel with a mobile mixed reality game, in: Proc. of MobileHCI 2008, pp. 235-244.
15. C.K. Hsee, J. Zhang, F. Yu and Y. Xi, Lay rationalism and inconsistency between predicted experience and decision, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16 (2003), 257-272. (Pubitemid 37291550)
16. J. Häkkilä, Usability with context-aware mobile applications, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oulu, 2006.
17. T. Höllerer and S. Feiner, Mobile augmented reality, in: Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing and Services H. Karimi and A. Hammad, eds, Taylor & Francis Books Ltd., 2004.
18. ISO FDIS 9241-210:2009, Ergonomics of human system interaction -Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407), International organization for standardization, ISO.
19. J. Jain, R. Ghosh and M. Dekhil, Multimodal shopping lists, in: Proc. of Human-Computer Interaction, 2009, 39-47.
20. E. Kaasinen, User needs for location-aware mobile services, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7 (2003), 70-79.
21. E. Kaasinen, User acceptance of mobile services -Value, ease of use, trust and ease of adoption, Ph.D. Dissertation, VTT Publications 566, 2005.
22. E. Kruijff, E. Swan and S. Feiner, Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited, in: Proc. of Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) 2010.
23. S. Kurniawan, M. Mahmud and Y. Nugroho, A study of the use of mobile phones by older persons, in: Proc. of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2006, pp. 989-994.
24. P.J. Ludford, D. Frankowski, K. Reily, K. Wilms and L. Terveen, Because I carry my cell phone anyway: Functional location-based reminder applications, in: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2006, pp. 889-898. (Pubitemid 44032179)
25. W.E. Mackay, Augmenting reality: A new paradigm for interacting with computers, La Recherche (1996).
26. P. Milgram and F. Kishino, A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays, IEICE Transactions on Information Systems E77-D(12) (1994), 1321-1329.
27. A. Morrison, A. Oulasvirta, P. Peltonen, S. Lemmelä, G. Jacucci, G. Reitmayr, J. Näsänen and A. Juustila, Like bees around the hive: A comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map, in: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2009, pp. 1889-1898.
28. S. Nilsson, Augmentation in the wild: User centered development and evaluation of augmented reality applications, Ph.D. Dissertation, Linköping University, 2010.
29. T. Olsson, P. Ihamäki, E. Lagerstam, L. Ventä-Olkkonen and K. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, User expectations for mobile mixed reality services, in: Proc. of 4th European Conference for Cognitive Ergonomics 2009, pp. 177-184.
30. T. Olsson and M. Salo, Online user survey on current mobile augmented reality applications, in: Proc. of Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) 2011.
31. Z.-R. Peng, M.-H. Tsou, Internet GIS, Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Networks, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2003.
32. P. Remagnino and G.L. Foresti, Ambient intelligence: A new multidiciplinary paradigm, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics -Part A: Systems and Humans 35 (1) (2005).
33. E.M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed, Free Press, 1995.
34. M. Rohs, Marker-based embodied interaction for handheld augmented reality games, Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting 4(5) (2007).
35. H. Sato, I. Kitahara and Y. Ohta, MR-mirror: A complex of real and virtual mirrors, in: Proc. of Virtual and Mixed Reality 2009, pp. 482-491.
36. M. Satyanarayanan, Pervasive computing: Vision and challenges, IEEE Personal Communication (2001), 10-17.
37. A. Schmidt, Ubiquitous computing -Computing in context. Ph.D. Dissertation, Lancaster University, 2002.
38. E. Swan and J.L. Gabbard, Survey of user-based experimentation in augmented reality, in: Proc. of 1st International Conference on Virtual Reality, 2005.
39. J. Vallino, Interactive augmented reality, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester, 1998.
40. V. Venkatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis and F. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425-478.
41. D. Wagner and D. Schmalstieg, Making augmented reality practical on mobile phones, part 2, IEEE computer Graphics and Applications 29(4) (2009), 6-9.
42. M. Weiser, The computer for the 21st century, Scientific American 265(3) (1991), 94-104.
43. P. Wellner, W. Mackay and R. Gold, Back to the real world, Communications of the ACM 36(7) (1993), 24-26.