Experiences with an AR evaluation test bed: Presence, performance, and physiological measurement

9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2010: Science and Technology, ISMAR 2010 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 127-136

  Gandy, Maribeth ^a,c   Catrambone, Richard ^a   MacIntyre, Blair ^a   Alvarez, Chris ^a   Eiriksdottir, Elsa ^a   Hilimire, Matthew ^a   Davidson, Brian ^a   McLaughlin, Anne Collins ^b  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Evaluation; H.5.1 information interfaces and presentation : Multimedia information systems artificial, augmented, and virtual realities; H.5.2 information interfaces and presentation : Multimedia information systems evaluation methodology; Physiological measures; Presence

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; H.5.1 [INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION]: MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION SYSTEMS - ARTIFICIAL , AUGMENTED , AND VIRTUAL REALITIES; H.5.2 [INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION]; PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES; PRESENCE;

ARGON; AUGMENTED REALITY; EQUIPMENT TESTING; EXPERIMENTS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL TESTS; SURVEYS; TEST FACILITIES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 78651096045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643560     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. R.S. Allison, L.R. Harris, M. Jenkin, U. Jasiobedzka, J.E Zacher. Tolerance of Temporal Delay in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality 2001 Conference (Vr'01) (March 13 - 17, 2001). VR. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 247.
2. J. Andreassi. Psychophysiology: human behavior and physiological response. Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2006
3. S. Bouchard, J. St-Jacques, G. Robillard, P. Renaud. Anxiety Increases the Feeling of Presence in Virtual Reality , Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, August 2008, Vol. 17, No. 4: 376-391.
4. A. Brogni, V. Vinayagamoorthy, A. Steed, M. Slater. Variations in physiological responses of participants during different stages of an immersive virtual environment experiment. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '06) (Limassol, Cyprus, November 01 - 03, 2006)
5. D.C. Cohen, "Comparison of Self-Report and Behavioral Procedures for Assessing Acrophobia," Behavior Therapy, Vol. 8, 1977, p17-23
6. J.E. Cutting. How the eye measures reality and virtual reality. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 29, 29-36. 1997
7. A. Dünser, R. Grasset , M. Billinghurst. A survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, (ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008) (Singapore, 2008)
8. J. Fischer, D. Bartz, W. Straßer, Artistic reality: fast brush stroke stylization for augmented reality, Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology (VRST '05) (Monterey, CA, USA, November 07-09, 2005)
9. A.W. IJsselsteijn, W. Oosting, I. Vogels, Y. de Kort, E. van Loenen. A Room with a Cue: The Efficacy of Movement Parallax, Occlusion, and Blur in Creating a Virtual Window full access, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, June 2008, Vol. 17, No. 3: 269-282
10. M. C. Juan, R. Baños, C. Botella, D. Pérez, M. Alcaníiz, C. Monserrat. An Augmented Reality System for the Treatment of Acrophobia: The Sense of Presence Using Immersive Photography, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, August 2006, Vol. 15, No. 4: 393-402
11. M.C. Juan, D. Pérez. Comparison of the Levels of Presence and Anxiety in an Acrophobic Environment Viewed via HMD or CAVE, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, June 2009, Vol. 18, No. 3: 232-248.
12. M. Lee and G.J. Kim. Effects of heightened sensory feedback to presence and arousal in virtual driving simulators. In Proceedings of the 8th international Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in industry (VRCAI '09) (Yokohama, Japan, December 14 - 15, 2009). S. N. Spencer, Ed. ACM, New York, NY, 151-156.
13. B. MacIntyre, J. D. Bolter, and M. Gandy. Presence and the aura of meaningful places. In Proceedings of 7th Annual International Workshop on Presence (PRESENCE 2004), (Valencia, Spain, October 13-15, 2004)
14. R.L. Mandryk, K.M. Inkpen. Physiological Indicators for the Evaluation of Co-located Collaborative Play, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '04)(Chicago, Illinois, USA, November 06 - 10, 2004).
15. K. Mania, B.D. Adelstein, S.R. Ellis, M.I Hill. Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV '04)(Los Angeles, California, August 07 - 08, 2004). vol. 73., 39-47.
16. O. Martin, B. Julian, L. Boissieux, J.D. Gascuel, C. Prablanc. Evaluating online control of goal-directed arm movement while standing in virtual visual environment. Journal of Visual Computer Animation. 2003;14:253-260.
17. M.J. Meehan. Physiological Reaction as an Objective Measure of Presence in Virtual Environments. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: AAI3007847., UNC at Chapel Hill. 2001
18. M. J. Meehan B. Insko , M. Whitton , F. P. Brooks. Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, July 2002 Volume 21 Issue 3
19. A. Morrison , A. Oulasvirta , P. Peltonen , S. Lemmela , G. Jacucci , G. Reitmayr , J. Näsänen , A. Juustila, Like bees around the hive: a comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA
20. S.C. Nichols, C. Haldane, J.R. Wilson. Measurement of Presence and Side Effects in Virtual Environments, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(3), 471-491.) 2000
21. D. Nunez and E. Blake. Cognitive presence as a unified concept of virtual reality effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 1st Intl. Conf. on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality and Visualisation (AFRIGRAPH '01)(Camps Bay, Cape Town, South Africa, November 05 - 07, 2001). ACM, New York, NY, 115-118.
22. M. Slater, M. Usoh, and A. Steed. Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2, 3 (Sep. 1995), 201-219.
23. M. Slater. Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(5), 560-565
24. M. Slater, P. Khanna, J. Mortensen, I. Yu, I. Visual Realism Enhances Realistic Response in an Immersive Virtual Environment. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 29, 3 (May. 2009), 76-84.
25. B. Stevens, J. Jerrams-Smith, D. Heathcote, and D. Callear. Putting the virtual into reality: assessing object-presence with projection-augmented models. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11, 1 (Feb. 2002), 79-92.
26. A. Tang, F. Biocca, L. Lim. Comparing differences in presence during social interaction in augmented reality versus virtual reality environments: an exploratory study, In Proceedings of 7th Annual International Workshop on Presence (PRESENCE 2004), (Valencia, Spain, October 13-15, 2004)
27. W.B. Thompson, P. Willemsen, A.A. Gooch, S. Creem-Regehr, J.M. Loomis, A.C. Beall. Does the Quality of Computer Graphics Matter When Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Volume 13, Number 5, October 2004.
28. M. Usoh, K. Arthur, M.C. Whitton, R. Bastos, A. Steed, M. Slater, F.P. Brooks. Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conf. on Computer Graphics and interactive. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 359-364.
29. M. Usoh, E. Catena, S. Arman, & M. Slater, Presence questionnaires in reality, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9, 497-503, 2000
30. I. Wagner, W. Broll, G. Jacucci, K. Kuutii, R. McCall, A. Morrison, D. Schmalstieg, J.J. Terrin. On the Role of Presence in Mixed Reality, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, August 2009, Vol. 18, No. 4: 249-276.
31. G. M. Wilson. Psychophysiological Indicators of the Impact of Media Quality on Users, Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, 2001
32. B. G. Witmer, M. J. Singer. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240. 1998
33. Zimmons, P. and A. Panter. The Influence of Rendering Quality on Presence and Task Performance in a Virtual Environment. In Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings. 2003: IEEE Computer Society.293-294