Reason-based choice: A bargaining rationale for the attraction and compromise effects

Theoretical Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 125-162

  de Clippel, Geoffroy ^a   Eliaz, Kfir ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attraction and compromise effects; Bargaining; Behavioral economics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855724072     PISSN: 19336837     EISSN: 15557561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3982/TE798     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ambrus, Attila and Kareen Rozen (2009), "Rationalizing choice with multi-self models." Unpublished paper, Yale University.
2. Anbarci, Nejat (2006), "Finite alternating-move arbitration schemes and the equal area solution. Theory and Decision, 61, 21-50. DOI: 10.1007/s11238-005-4748-9.
3. Ariely, Dan (2008), Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. Harper Collins, New York.
4. Benhabib, Jess and Alberto Bisin (2005), "Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 460-492. DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2004.10.004.
5. Bernheim, Douglas and Antonio Rangel (2004), "Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review, 94, 1558-1590. DOI: 10.1257/0002828043052222.
6. Brams, Steven J. and D. Marc Kilgour (2001), "Fallback bargaining. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 287-316. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011252808608.
7. Chambers, Christopher P. and Federico Echenique (2009), "The core matchings of markets with transfers." Unpublished paper, Caltech.
8. Cherepanov, Vadim, Timothy Feddersen, and Alvaro Sandroni (2008), "Rationalization." Unpublished paper, Northwestern University.
9. Chiappori, Pierre André (1988), "Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56, 63-90. DOI: 10.2307/1911842.
10. Chiappori, Pierre André, Olivier Donni, and Ivana Komujer (forthcoming), "Learning from a piece of pie. Review of Economic Studies.
11. Chiappori, Pierre André and Ivar Ekeland (2009), "The microeconomics of efficient group behavior: Identification. Econometrica, 77, 763-799. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA5929.
12. Eliaz, Kfir and Ran Spiegler (2006), "Contracting with diversely naïve agents. Review of Economic Studies, 73, 689-714. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00392.x.
13. Eliaz, Kfir, Michael Richter, and Ariel Rubinstein (2011), "An étude in choice theory: Choosing the two finalists. Economic Theory, 46, 211-219. DOI: 10.1007/s00199-009-0516-3.
14. Fudenberg, Drew and David K. Levine (2006), "A dual-self model of impulse control. American Economic Review, 96, 1449-1476. DOI: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1449.
15. Green, Jerry R. and Daniel A. Hojman (2007), "Choice, rationality and welfare measurement." Unpublished paper, Harvard University.
16. Gul, Faruk and Wolfgang Pesendorfer (2001), "Temptation and self-control. Econometrica, 69, 1403-1435. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00252.
17. Huber, Joel, John W. Payne, and Christopher Puto (1982), "Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90-98. DOI: 10.1086/208899.
18. Hurwicz, Leonid and Murat R. Sertel (1997), "Designing mechanisms, in particular for electoral systems: The majoritarian compromise." Unpublished paper, Boǧaziçi University.
19. Kalai, Gil, Ariel Rubinstein, and Ran Spiegler (2002), "Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationales. Econometrica, 70, 2481-2488. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00382.
20. Kamenica, Emir (2008), "Contextual inference in markets: On the informational content of product lines. American Economic Review, 98, 2127-2149. DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.5.2127.
21. Karni, Edi and David Schmeidler (1976), "Independence of nonfeasible alternatives, and independence of nonoptimal alternatives. Journal of Economic Theory, 12, 488-493. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(76)90042-9.
22. Kibris, Özgür and Murat R. Sertel (2007), "Bargaining over a finite set of alternatives. Social Choice and Welfare, 28, 421-437. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-006-0178-z.
23. Kivetz, Ran, Oded Netzer, and V. Srinivasan (2004a), "Alternative models for capturing the compromise effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 237-257. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.41.3.237.35990.
24. Kivetz, Ran, Oded Netzer, and V. Srinivasan (2004b), "Extending compromise effect models to complex buying situations and other context effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 262-268. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.41.3.262.35993.
25. Lombardi, Michele (2009), "Reason-based choice correspondences. Mathematical Social Sciences, 57, 58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.07.001.
26. Manzini, Paola and Marco Mariotti (2007), "Sequentially rationalizable choice. American Economic Review, 97, 1824-1839. DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.5.1824.
27. Mariotti, Marco (1998), "Nash bargaining theory when the number of alternatives can be finite. Social Choice and Welfare, 15, 413-421. DOI: 10.1007/s003550050114.
28. Ok, Efe A., Pietro Ortoleva, and Gil Riella (2011), "Revealed (p)reference theory." Unpublished paper, Caltech.
29. Rubinstein, Ariel (1982), "Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50, 97-109. DOI: 10.2307/1912531.
30. Segal, Uzi (1987), "Some remarks on Quiggin's anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8, 145-154. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(87)90027-8.
31. Sen, Amartya K. (1971), "Choice functions and revealed preference. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 307-317. DOI: 10.2307/2296384.
32. Shafir, Eldar, Itamar Simonson, and Amos Tversky (1993), "Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-S.
33. Simonson, Itamar (1989), "Choice based on reasons: The case for the attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174. DOI: 10.1086/209205.
34. Sprumont, Yves (1993), "Intermediate preferences and Rawlsian arbitration rules. Social Choice and Welfare, 10, 1-15. DOI: 10.1007/BF00187429.
35. Sprumont, Yves (2000), "On the testable implications of collective choice theories. Journal of Economic Theory, 93, 205-232. DOI: 10.1006/jeth.2000.2657.
36. Tversky, Amos and Eldar Shafir (1992), "Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3, 358-361. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00047.x.