Community-level controversy over a natural resource: Toward a more democratic science in society

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 429-445

  Lee, Stuart ^a   Roth, Wolff Michael ^b  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Community; Controversy; Experts and citizens; Public understanding of science

Indexed keywords

NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 33645126762     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920600561124     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alder, K.1998. Making things the same: Representation, tolerance and the end of the Ancien Régime in France. Social Stud. Sci. 28:499-545. [CSA]
2. Blume, S. S.2000. Land of hope and glory: Exploring cochlear implantation in the Netherlands. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 25:139-166. [CSA]
3. Brown, N. and M.Michael. 2001. Switching between science and culture in transpecies transplantation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 26:3-22. [CSA]
4. Campbell, B. L.1985. Uncertainty as symbolic action in disputes among experts. Social Stud. Sci. 15:429-453. [CSA]
5. Edmond, G.2001. The law-set: The legal-scientific production of medical propriety. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 26:191-226. [CSA]
6. Edwards, D. and J.Potter. 1992. Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
7. Epstein, S.1997. Activism, drug regulation, and the politics of therapeutic evaluation in the AIDS era: A case study of ddC and the "Surrogate Markers" debate. Social Stud. Sci. 27:691-726. [CSA]
8. Escobar, A.1999. After nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Curr. Anthropol. 40:1-30. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
9. Fisher, F.2003. August/September. Crisis strengthens community. Nature & Society. http://www.natsoc.org.au/html/publications/ journalaug03.html [CSA]
10. Gilbert, G. N. and M.Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Goldstein, B.2000. Two roads to "good science" in the design of habitat conservation clans. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, Vienna, Austria, September27-30.
12. Greider, T. and L.Garkovich. 1994. Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociol. 59:1-24. [CSA]
13. Guba, E. and Y.Lincoln. 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Harper, R. H. R.2000. The organisation in ethnography: A discussion of ethnographic fieldwork programs in CSCW. Comput. Supported Coop. Work (CSCW) 9:239-264. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
15. Holling, C. S.2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390-405. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
16. Hull, B., D. P.Robertson, and A.Kendra. 2001. Public understandings of nature: A case study of local knowledge about "natural" forest conditions. Society Nat. Resources 14:325-340. [CSA]
17. Konisky, D. M. and T. C.Beierle. 2001. Innovations in public participation and environmental decision making: Examples from the Great Lakes region. Society Nat. Resources 14:815-826. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
18. Latour, B.1988. The pasteurization of France (trans. John Law and Alan Sheridan). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Latour, B.1999a. Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Latour, B.1999b. Politiques de la nature: Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. Paris: La Découverte.
21. Lee, S. and W.-M.Roth. 2001. How ditch and drain become a healthy creek: Representations, translations and agency during the re/design of a watershed. Social Stud. Sci. 31:315-356. [CSA]
22. Lynch, M.1998. The discursive production of uncertainty: The OJ Simpson "Dream Team" and the sociology of knowledge machine. Social Stud. Sci. 28:829-868. [CSA]
23. Mahanty, S. and D.Russell. 2002. High stakes: Lessons from stakeholder groups in the biodiversity conservation network. Society Nat. Resources 15:179-188. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
24. Norton, B. G.1998. Improving ecological communication: The role of ecologists in environmental policy formation. Ecol. Appl. 8:350-364. [CSA]
25. Peterson, T. R. and C. C.Horton. 1995. Rooted in the soil: How understanding the perspectives of landowners can enhance the management of environmental disputes. Q. J. Speech 81:139-166. [CSA]
26. Roth, W.-M.2005. Doing qualitative research: Praxis of method. Rotterdam: Sense.
27. Roth, W.-M. and A. C.Barton. 2004. Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.
28. Roth, W.-M. and S.Lee. 2002. Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understand. Sci. 11:33-56. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
29. Roth, W.-M., J.Riecken, L. L.Pozzer, R.McMillan, B.Storr, D.Tait, G.Bradshaw, and T.Pauluth Penner. 2004. Those who get hurt aren't always being heard: Scientist-resident interactions over community water. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 29:153-183. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
30. Smith, D. E.1990. The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
31. Smith, D. E.1999. Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
32. Solomon, S. M. and E. J.Hackett. 1996. Setting boundaries between science and law: Lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 21:131-156. [CSA]
33. Stoll-Kleeman, S. and T.O'Riordan. 2002. From participation to partnership in biodiversity protection: Experience from Germany and South Africa. Society Nat. Resources 15:161-177. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
34. Wynne, B.1996. Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. In Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology, eds. A.Irwin and B.Wynne, 19-46. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.