Concern for the environment among general publics: A cross-national study

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 883-898

  Marquart Pyatt, Sandra T ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross national; Environmental concern; Measurement

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS;

EID: 35348960479     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920701460341     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adeola, F. (1998) Cross-national environmentalism differentials: Empirical evidence from core and non-core nations. Society Nat. Resources, 11:4, pp. 339-355.
2. Arbuckle, J. (2003) AMOS 5.0, SPSS, Inc., Chicago
3. Bollen, K. (1989) Structural equations with latent variables, Wiley, New York
4. Brechin, S. (1999) Objective problems, subjective values, and global environmentalism: Evaluating the postmaterialist argument and challenging a new explanation. Social Sci. Q, 84:4, pp. 793-809.
5. Brechin, S. and Kempton, W. (1994) Global environmentalism: A challenge to the postmaterialism thesis?. Social Sci. Q, 75, pp. 245-269.
6. Brechin, S. and Kempton, W. (1997) Beyond postmaterialist values: National versus individual explanations of global environmentalism. Social Sci. Q, 78, pp. 16-20.
7. Browne, M. and Cudeck, R. (1993) Testing structural equation models, pp. 136-162. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
8. Buttel, F. (1992) Environmentalization: Origins, processes and implications for rural social change. Rural Sociol., 57:1, pp. 1-27.
9. Dekker, P., Ester, P. and Nas, M. (1997) Religion, culture and environmental concern: An empirical cross-national analysis. Social Compass, 44:3, pp. 443-458.
10. Diekmann, A. and Franzen, A. (1999) The wealth of nations and environmental concern. Environ. Behav., 31:4, pp. 540-549.
11. Dietz, T., Stern, P. and Guagnano, G. (1998) Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environ. Behav., 30:4, pp. 450-471.
12. Dunlap, R., Gallup Jr., G. and Gallup, A. (1993) Of global concern: Results of the health of the Planet Survey. Environment, 35:9, pp. 7-40.
13. Dunlap, R. and Jones, R. (2002) Handbook of environmental sociology, pp. 482-524. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT
14. Dunlap, R. and Jones, R. (2003) Encyclopedia of psychological assessment, pp. 364-369. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
15. Dunlap, R. and Mertig, A. (1995) Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite?. J. Social Issues, 51, pp. 121-137.
16. Dunlap, R. and Mertig, A. (1997) Global environmental concern: An anomaly for postmaterialism. Social Sci. Q, 78, pp. 24-29.
17. Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A. and Jones, R. (2000) Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. J. Social Issues, 56:3, pp. 425-442.
18. Franzen, A. (2003) Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An Analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Social Sci. Q, 83, pp. 297-308.
19. (2002) The culture of German environmentalism: Anxieties, visions, realities, Berghahn Books, New York
20. Inglehart, R. (1995) Public support for environmental protection: The impact of objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Polit Sci. Polit., 28:1, pp. 57-71.
21. (1993) Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], Ann Arbor, MI
22. Jamison, A. (2001) The making of green knowledge: Environmental politics and cultural transformation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
23. Jones, R. and Dunlap, R. (1992) The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?. Rural Sociol., 57:1, pp. 28-47.
24. Jones, R., Fly, J., Talley, J. and Cordell, H. (2003) Green migration into rural America: The new frontier of environmentalism?. Society Nat. Resources, 16, pp. 221-238.
25. Kemmelmeier, M., Krol, G. and Kim, Y. H. (2002) Values, economics, and pro-environmental attitudes in 22 societies. Cross-Cultural Res., 36:3, pp. 256-285.
26. Kidd, Q. and Lee, A. -R. (1997) Post materialist values and the environment: A critique and reappraisal. Social Sci. Q, 78:1, pp. 1-15.
27. Klineberg, S., McKeever, M. and Rothenbach, B. (1998) Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it's measured. Social Sci. Q, 79:4, pp. 734-753.
28. Lee, A. -R. and Kidd, Q. (1997) More on postmaterialist values and the environment. Social Science Q, 78:1, pp. 36-43.
29. Routhe, Jones, A. R. and Feldman, D. (2005) Using theory to understand public support for collective actions that impact the environment: Alleviating water supply problems in a nonarid biodome. Social Sci. Q., 86:4, pp. 874-897.
30. Tanaka, J. S. (1993) Testing structural equation models, pp. 10-39. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
31. Van Liere, K. and Dunlap, R. (1980) The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opin. Q., 44:2, pp. 181-197.
32. Van Liere, K. and Dunlap, R. (1981) Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it's measured?. Environ. Behav., 13:6, pp. 651-684.
33. Weaver, A. (2002) Determinants of environmental attitudes. Int. J. Sociol., 32:1, pp. 77-108.