GROMACS-the road ahead

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science

Volumn 1, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 710-715

  Van der Spoel, David ^a   Hess, Berk ^b,c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c ALBANOVA UNIVERSITY CENTER   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL SIMULATIONS; CHEMICAL SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; PHYSICAL MODEL; SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARES; STATE OF THE ART; THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS;

EXPERIMENTS; MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

EID: 84855642902     PISSN: 17590876     EISSN: 17590884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.50     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC. Gromos-87 manual, Biomos BV, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands, 1987.
2. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. Gromacs 4.0: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008, 4:435-447.
3. Schulz R, Lindner B, Petridis L, Smith JC. Scaling of multimillion-atom biological molecular dynamics simulation on a petascale supercomputer. J Chem Theory Comput 2009, 5:2798-2808.
4. Stone JE, Hardy DJ, Ufimtsev IS, Schulten K. GPU-accelerated molecular modeling coming of age. J Mol Graph Model 2010, 29:116-125.
5. Larsson P, Hess B, Lindahl E. Algorithm improvements for molecular dynamics simulations. Comput. Molec. Sci. 1 (2011) DOI: 10.1002/wcms.3.
6. Ahlström P, Wallqvist A, Engström S, Jönsson B. A molecular dynamics study of polarizable water. Mol Phys 1989, 68:563-581.
7. Saint-Martin H, Hernández-Cobos J, Bernal-Uruchurtu MI, Ortega- Blake I, Berendsen HJC. A mobile charge densities in harmonic oscillators MCDHO molecular model for numerical simulation: the water-water interaction. J Chem Phys 2000, 113:10899-10912.
8. van Maaren PJ, van der Spoel D. Molecular dynamics simulations of water with a novel shell-model potential. J Phys Chem B 2001, 105: 2618-2626.
9. Yu HB, Hansson T, van Gunsteren WF. Development of a simple, self- consistent polarizable model for liquid water. J Chem Phys 2003, 118:221-234.
10. Lamoureux G, Roux B. Modeling induced polarization with classical drude oscillators: theory and molecular dynamics simulation algorithm. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:3025-3039.
11. Zhu X, Mackerell AD Jr. Polarizable empirical force field for sulfur-containing compounds based on the classical drude oscillator model. J Comput Chem 2010, 31:2330-2341.
12. Ponder JW, Wu C, Ren P, Pande VS, Chodera JD, Schnieders MJ, Haque I, Mobley DL, Lambrecht DS, DiStasio RA Jr, et al. Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. J Phys Chem B 2010, 114:2549-2564.
13. Elking DM, Cisneros GA, Piquemal J-P, Darden TA, Pedersen LG. Gaussian multipole model GMM. J Chem Theory Comput 2010, 6:190-202.
14. Smith CM, Hall GG. The approximation of electron densities. Theor Chim Acta 1986, 69:63-69.
15. Lindahl E, Hess BA, van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 2001, 7:306-317.
16. Lill MA, Helms V. Molecular dynamics simulation of proton transport with quantum mechanically derived proton hopping rates Q-hop MD. J Chem Phys 2001, 115:7993-8005.
17. Murray-Rust P, Rzepa HS, Wright M, Zara S. A universal approach to web-based chemistry using XML and CML. Chem Comm 2000, 16:1471-1472.
18. Kasson PM, Lindahl E, Pande VS. Atomic-resolution simulations predict a transition state for vesicle fusion defined by contact of a few lipid tails. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:1-8.
19. Larsson P, Lindahl E. A method for interaction rescaling to enable high-performance tabulated generalized born simulations. J Comput Chem 2010, 31:2593-2600.
20. Eastman P, Pande VS, Open MM. A hardware-independent framework for molecular simulations. Comput Sci Eng 2010, 12:34-39.
21. Marrink SJ, Risselada HJ, Yefimov S, Tieleman DP, de Vries AH. The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 2007, 111:7812-7824.
22. Yesylevskyy SO, Schafer LV, Sengupta D, Marrink SJ. Polarizable water model for the coarse-grained MARTINI force field. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000810.
23. Wensink EJW, Hoffmann AC, van Maaren PJ, van der Spoel D. Dynamic properties of water/alcohol mixtures studied by computer simulation. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:7308-7317.
24. van der Spoel D, van Maaren PJ, Larsson P, Tîmneanu N. Thermodynamics of hydrogen bonding in hydrophilic and hydrophobic media. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110:4393-4398.
25. Warshel A, Levitt M. Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions-dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of carbonium-ion in reaction of lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1976, 103:227-249.
26. Rzepiela AJ, Schafer LV, Goga N, Risselada HJ, De Vries AH, Marrink SJ. Software news and update reconstruction of atomistic details from coarse-grained structures. J Comput Chem 2010, 31:1333-1343.
27. Christen M, van Gunsteren W. Multigraining: an algorithm for simultaneous fine-grained and coarse-grained simulation of molecular systems. J Chem Phys 2006, 124:154106.
28. Praprotnik M, Delle Site L, Kremer K. Multiscale simulation of soft matter: from scale bridging to adaptive resolution. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2008, 59:545-571.
29. Peter C, Kremer K. Multiscale simulation of soft matter systems-from the atomistic to the coarse-grained level and back. Soft Matter 2009, 5:4357-4366.
30. Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS potential functions for proteins. Energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc 1988, 110:1657-1666.
31. Liem S, Brown D, Clarke J. Molecular-dynamics simulations on distributed memory machines. Comput Phys Commun 1991, 67:261-267.
32. Shaw DE. A fast, scalable method for the parallel evaluation of distance-limited pairwise particle interactions. J Comp Chem 2005, 26:1318-1328.
33. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz-Jr KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins and nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc 1995, 117:5179-5197.
34. Mackerell A. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues. J Comput Chem 2004, 25:1584-1604.
35. Bjelkmar P, Larsson P, Cuendet MA, Hess B, Lindahl E. Implementation of the CHARMM force field in GROMACS: analysis of protein stability effects from correction maps, virtual interaction sites, and water models. J Chem Theory Comput 2010, 6:459-466.
36. Hess B. P-LINCS: a parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008, 4:116-122.
37. Feenstra KA, Hess B, Berendsen HJC. Improving efficiency of large time-scale molecular dynamics simulations of hydrogen-rich systems. J Comp Chem 1999, 20:786-798.