Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 3-20

  Beskow, Laura M ^a   Namey, Emily E ^a   Jean Cadigan, R ^b   Brazg, Tracy ^c   Crouch, Julia ^c   Henderson, Gail E ^b   Michie, Marsha ^b   Nelson, Daniel K ^b   Tabor, Holly K ^c   Wilfond, Benjamin S ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c SEATTLE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Disclosure of research results; Genetic research; Informed consent; Research participants; Research recruitment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DUTY TO RECONTACT; ETHICS; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; DISCLOSURE; DUTY TO RECONTACT; FEMALE; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855524838     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Beskow, L. M., Botkin, J. R., Daly, M., Juengst, E. T., Lehmann, L. S., Merz, J. F., et al. (2004). Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research. American Journal of Medical Genetics A, 130A(4), 424-431. (Pubitemid 39441623)
2. Beskow, L. M., Burke, W., Fullerton, S. M., & Sharp, R. R. (in press). Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: Opportunities and challenges. Genetics in Medicine.
3. Beskow, L. M., Linney, K. N., Radtke, R. A., Heinzen, E. L., & Goldstein, D. B. (2010). Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment. Genome Research, 20(6), 705-709.
4. Beskow, L. M., Namey, E. E., Miller, P. R., Nelson, D. K., & Cooper, A. (in press). IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment. IRB.
5. Beskow, L. M. & Smolek, S. J. (2009). Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(3), 99-111.
6. Bookman, E. B., Langehorne, A. A., Eckfeldt, J. H., Glass, K. C., Jarvik, G. P., Klag, M. et al. (2006). Reporting ge-netic results in research studies: Summary and recommenda-tions of an NHLBI working group. American Journal of Medical Genetics A, 140(10), 1033-1040.
7. Cadigan, R. J., Michie, M., Henderson, G., Davis, A. M., & Beskow, L. M. (2011). The meaning of genetic research results: Reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(4), 30-40.
8. Chulada, P. C., Vahdat, H. L., Sharp, R. R., DeLozier, T. C., Watkins, P. B., Pusek, S. N., & Blackshear, P. J. (2008). The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: A DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci. Human Genetics, 123(2), 207-214.
9. Fabsitz, R. R., McGuire, A., Sharp, R. R., Puggal, M., Beskow, L. M., Biesecker, L. G. et al. (2010). Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: Updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, 3(6), 574-580.
10. Green, R. C., Roberts, J. S., Cupples, L. A., Relkin, N. R., Whitehouse, P. J., Brown, T. et al. (2009). Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(3), 245-254.
11. Kaufman, D., Murphy, J., Scott, J., & Hudson, K. (2008). Subjects matter: A survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genetics in Medicine, 10(11), 831-839.
12. MacQueen, K., McLellan, E., Kay, K., & Milstein, B. (1998). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 10(2), 31-36.
13. McGuire, S. E. & McGuire, A. L. (2008). Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: Enabling a bottom-up approach in genome-wide association studies. Genome Research, 18(11), 1683-1685.
14. Meulenkamp, T. M., Gevers, S. K., Bovenberg, J. A., Koppelman, G. H., van Hylckama Vlieg, A., & Smets, E. M. (2010). Communication of biobanks' research re-sults: What do (potential) participants want? American Journal of Medical Genetics A, 152A(10), 2482-2492.
15. Murphy, J., Scott, J., Kaufman, D., Geller, G., LeRoy, L., & Hudson, K. (2008). Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(11), 36-43.
16. Namey, E. E. & Beskow, L. M. (2011). Epilepsy patient-participants and genetic research results as "answers." Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(4), 21-29.
17. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1999). Research involv-ing human biological materials: Ethical issues and policy guidance, volume 1. Rockville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19. Ormond, K. E., Cirino, A. L., Helenowski, I. B., Chisholm, R. L., & Wolf, W A. (2009). Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. American Journal of Medical Genetics A, 149A(2), 188-198.
20. Tabor, H. K., Brazg, T., Crouch, J., Namey, E. E., Fullerton, S. M., Beskow, L. M., & Wilfond, B. S. (in press). Parent per-spectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(4), 41-52.
21. Wendler, D. & Emanuel, E. (2002). The debate over research on stored biological samples: What do sources think? Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(13), 1457-1462. (Pubitemid 34747478)