Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 99-111

  Beskow, Laura M ^a   Smolek, Sondra J ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Access to research results; Biological specimen banks; Biorepository; Confidentiality; Disclosure of research results; Informed consent; Research subjects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; DISCLOSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 70349556038     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.3.99     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BESKOW, L. M., BURKE, W., MERZ, J. F., BARR, P. A., TERRY, S., PENCHASZADEH, V. B., GOSTIN, L. O., GWINN, M., & KHOURY, M. J. (2001). Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 286 (18), 2315-2321.
2. BESKOW, L. M. & DEAN, E. (2008). Informed consent for biorepositories: Assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 17(6), 1440-1451.
3. BOOKMAN, E. B., LANGEHORNE, A. A., ECKFELDT, J. H., GLASS, K. C., JARVIK, G. P., KLAG, M., KOSKI, G., MOTULSKY, A., WILFOND, B., MANOLIO, T. A., FABSITZ, R. R., & LUEPKER, R. V. (2006). Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 140A (10), 1033-1040.
4. CLAYTON, E. W. & ROSS, L. F. (2006). Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 37.
5. DIXON-WOODS, M., JACKSON, C., WINDRIDGE, K. C., & KENYON, S. (2006). Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: Qualitative study of participants' views. British Medical Journal, 332(7535), 206-210.
6. FERNANDEZ, C. V. (2008). Public expectations for return of results - Time to stop being paternalistic? American Journal of Bioethics, 8 (11), 46-48.
7. FERNANDEZ, C. V., KODISH, E., WEIJER, C. (2003). Informing study participants of research results: An ethical imperative. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 25(3), 12-19.
8. HAGA, S. B. & BESKOW, L. M. (2008). Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research. Advances in Genetics, 60, 505-544.
9. KAUFMAN, D., MURPHY, J., SCOTT, J., & HUDSON, K. (2008). Subjects matter: A survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genetics in Medicine, 10(11), 831-839.
10. KNOPPERS, B. M., JOLY, Y., SIMARD, J., & DUROCHER, F. (2006). The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14 (11), 1170-1178.
11. MANOLIO, T. A. (2006). Taking our obligations to research participants seriously: Disclosing individual results of genetic research. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 32-34.
12. MELTZER, L. A. (2006). Undesirable implications of disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 28-30.
13. MILLER, F. A., CHRISTENSEN, R., GIACOMINI, M., & ROBERT, J. S. (2008). Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(3), 210-213.
14. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1999). Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Volume 1: Report and Recommendations of the NBAC. Rockville, MD: NBAC. Available online at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/past_commissions/ nbac_biological1.pdf.
15. ORMOND, K. E., CIRINO, A. L., HELENOWSKI, I. B., CHISHOLM, R. L., WOLF, W. A. (2009). Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 149A (2), 188-198.
16. OSSORIO, P. N. (2006). Letting the gene out of the bottle: A comment on returning individual research results to participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 24-25.
17. PARKER, L. S. (2006). Rethinking respect for persons enrolled in research. American Society for Bioethics & Humanities Exchange, 9, 6-7.
18. PARTRIDGE, A. H., BURSTEIN, H. J., GELMAN, R. S., MARCOM, P. K., & WINER, E. P. (2003). Do patients participating in clinical trials want to know study results? JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 95, 491-492.
19. PARTRIDGE, A. H., WOLFF, A. C., MARCOM, P. K., KAUFMAN, P. A., ZHANG, L., GELMAN, R., MOORE, C., LAKE, D., FLEMING, G. F., RUGO, H. S., ATKINS, J., SAMPSON, E., COLLYAR, D., & WINER, E. P. (2009). The impact of sharing results of a randomized breast cancer clinical trial with study participants. Breast Cancer Research & Treatment, 115 (1), 123-129.
20. RAVITSKY, V. (2006). Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 8-17.
21. RICHARDS, M. P. M., PONDER, M., PHAROAH, P., EVEREST, S., & MACKAY, J. (2003). Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(2), 93-96.
22. SCHULZ, C. J., RIDDLE, M. P., VALDIMIRSDOTTIR, H. B., ABRAMSON, D. H., & SKLAR, C. A. (2003). Impact on survivors of retinoblastoma when informed of study results on risk of second cancers. Medical & Pediatric Oncology, 41, 36-43.
23. SHALOWITZ, D. I. & MILLER, F. G. (2005). Disclosing individual results of clinical research: Implications of respect for participants. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(6), 737-740.
24. SHARP, R. R. & FOSTER, M. W. (2006). Clinical utility and full disclosure of genetic results to research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 42-44.
25. SHICKLE, D. (2006). The consent problem within DNA biobanks. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37(3), 503-519.
26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). Code of Federal Regulations, Protection of Human Subjects: 45 CFR 46. Available online at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm.
27. WENDLER, D. & EMANUEL, E. (2002). The debate over research on stored biological samples: What do sources think? Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(13), 1457-1462.