Experimental comparison of first and second-order similarities in a scientometric context

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 675-685

  Colliander, Cristian ^a   Ahlgren, Per ^a,b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bibliographic coupling; Cluster analysis; Document document similarity; Science mapping; Similarity order; Textual coherence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855523185     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0491-x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahlgren, P., & Colliander, C. (2009a). Document-document similarity approaches and science mapping: experimental comparison of five approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 49-63.
2. Ahlgren, P., & Colliander, C. (2009b). Textual content, cited references, similarity order, and clustering: an experimental study in the context of science mapping. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (Vol. 2, pp 862-873), Rio de Janeiro.
3. Ahlgren, P., & Jarneving, B. (2008). Bibliographic coupling, common abstract stems and clustering: A comparison of two document-document similarity approaches in the context of science mapping. Scientometrics, 76(2), 273-290.
4. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
5. Arenas, A., Fernandez, A., & Gomez, S. (2008). Analysis of the structure of complex networks at different resolution levels. New Journal of Physics, 10, Article Number: 053039.
6. Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern information retrieval. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
7. Bland, J. M., & Kerry, S. M. (1998). Statistics notes-Weighted comparison of means. British Medical Journal, 316(7125), 129.
8. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics-Theory and Experiment, Article Number: P10008.
9. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
10. Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
11. Boyack, K. W., Newman, D., Duhon, R. J., Klavans, R., Patek, M., Biberstine, J. R., et al. (2011). Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches. PLoS One, 6(3), Article Number: e18029.
12. Cao, M., & Gao, X. (2005). Combining contents and citations for scientific document classification. AI 2005: Advances in artificial intelligence (pp. 143-152). Berlin: Springer.
13. Cribbin, T. (2011). Discovering latent topical structure by second-order similarity analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1188-1207.
14. Egghe, L. (2009). New relations between similarity measures for vectors based on vector norms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 232-239.
15. Egghe, L. (2010a). Good properties of similarity measures and their complementarity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2151-2160.
16. Egghe, L. (2010b). On the relation between the association strength and other similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1502-1504.
17. Egghe, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 1027-1036.
18. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2006). Classical retrieval and overlap measures satisfy the requirements for rankings based on a Lorenz curve. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 106-120.
19. Fortunato, S., & Barthelemy, M. (2007). Resolution limit in community detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(1), 36-41.
20. Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., & Persson, O. (2005). Combining full-text analysis and bibliometric indicators. A pilot study. Scientometrics, 63(1), 163-180.
21. Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57.
22. Hamers, L., Hemeryck, Y., Herweyers, G., Janssen, M., Keters, H., Rousseau, R., et al. (1989). Similarity measures in scientometric research- The Jaccard index versus Salton cosine formula. Information Processing & Management, 25(3), 315-318.
23. Janssens, F., Quoc, V. T., Glänzel, W., & Moor, B. D. (2006). Integration of textual content and link information for accurate clustering of science fields. In InSCit2006, Current Research in Information Sciences and Technologies: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Global Information Systems (Vol. I, pp. 615-619), Merida, Spain.
24. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251-263.
25. Levenshtein, V. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 845-848.
26. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton's cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77-85.
27. Lin, J. H. (1991). Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37(1), 145-151.
28. Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15-36.
29. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70(5), Article Number: 056131.
30. Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1993). Co-word-based science maps of chemical-engineering. Part 1: Representations by direct multidimensional-scaling. Research Policy, 22(1), 23-45.
31. Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5), 513-523.
32. Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Schneider, J. W., & Borlund, P. (2007a). Matrix comparison, part 1: Motivation and important issues for measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1586-1595.
34. Schneider, J. W., & Borlund, P. (2007b). Matrix comparison, part 2: Measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results by use of the mantel and procrustes statistics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1596-1609.
35. Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2006). Introduction to data mining. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.
36. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635-1651.
37. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Witten, I. H., Paynter, G. W., Frank, E., Gutwin, C., & Nevill-Manning, C. (1999). KEA: Practical automatic keyphrase extraction. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries, Berkeley, CA.