Matrix comparison, part 2: Measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results by use of the mantel and procrustes statistics

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1596-1609

  Schneider, Jesper W ^a   Borlund, Pia ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

INFORMETRIC STUDIES; MATRIX COMPARISON; PROCRUSTES STATISTICS; PROXIMITY MEASURES;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 34548581132     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20642     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Borgatti, S.P. (2002). A statistical method for comparing aggregate data across a priori groups. Field Methods, 14(1), 88-107.
2. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies.
3. Braam, R.R., Moed, H., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1988). Mapping of science: Critical elaboration and new approaches, a case study in agricultural biochemistry. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88: Select Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval (pp. 15-18). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Carroll, J.D., & Chang, J.J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 35(3), 283-319.
5. Clifford, H.T., & Stephenson, W. (1975). An introduction to numerical classification. New York: Academic Press.
6. Cox, T.F.̈, & Cox, M.A.A. (2000). Multidimensional scaling (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
7. Daniel, W.W. (1978). Applied nonparametric statisics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. De Leeuw, J. (1977). Applications of convex analysis to multidimensional scaling. In J.R. Barra, F. Brodeau, G. Romier, & B.V. Cutsem (Eds.), Recent developments in statistics (pp. 133-146). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
9. Dietz, E.J. (1983). Permutation tests for association between two distance matrices. Systematic Zoology, 32(1), 21-26.
10. Douglas, M.E., & Endler, J.A. (1982), Quantitative matrix comparisons in ecological and evolutionary investigations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 99(4), 777-795.
11. Driver, H.E., & Kroeber, A.L. (1932). Quantitative expression of cultural relationships. The University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 31, 211-256.
12. Friedlaender, J.S., Sgaramella-Zonta, K.K., Kidd, K.K., Lai, L.Y.C., Clark, P., & Walsh, R.J. (1971). Biological divergences in South-Central Bougainville: An analysis of blood polymorphism gene frequencies and anthropometric measurements utilizing tree models, and a comparison of these variables with linguistic, geographic, and migrational distances. American Journal of Human Genetics, 23(3), 253-270.
13. Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57.
14. Gower, J.C. (1971). Statistical methods for comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In J.R. Hodson, D.G. Kendall, & P. Tautu (Eds.), Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences (pp. 138-149). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
15. Gower, J.C. (1975). Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika, 40(1), 33-51.
16. Gower, J.C., & Dijksterhuis, G.B. (2004). Procrustes problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Green, B.F. (1952). The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 17(4), 429-440.
18. Hamers, L., Hemeryck, Y., Herweyers, M., Janssen, M., Keters, H., Rousseau, R., et al. (1989). Similarity measures in scientometric research: The Jaccard index versus Salton's cosine formula. Information Processing and Management, 25(3), 315-318.
19. Hubert, L.J. (1978). Generalized proximity function comparisons. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 179-192.
20. Hubert, L.J. (1985). Combinatorial data analysis: Association and partial association. Psychometrika, 50(4), 449-467.
21. Hubert, L.J. (1987). Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
22. Hubert, L.J., & Baker, F.B. (1977). Comparisons and fitting of given classification schemes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 16(3), 233-253.
23. Hubert, L.J., & Schultz, J. (1976). Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 29, 190-241.
24. Hurley, J.R., & Cattell, R.B. (1962). The Procrustes program: Producing direct rotation to test a hypothesized factor structure. Behavioral Science, 7(2), 258-262.
25. Jaccard, P. (1901). Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines [Distribution of alpine flora in the Basin of Dranses and some close areas]. Bulletin et la Sociáté Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37, 241-272.
26. Jackson, D.A. (1995). Protest - A Procrustean randomization test of community environment concordance. Ecoscience, 2(3), 297-303.
27. Jackson, D.A., & Somers, K.M. (1989). Are probability estimates from the permutation model of Mantel's test stable? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67, 766-769.
28. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251-263.
29. Krackhardt, D. (1987). QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Social Networks, 9, 171-186.
30. Krzanowski, W.J. (2000). Principles of multivariate analysis: A user's perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Lapointe, F.J., & Legendre, P. (1992). Statistical significance of the matrix correlation coefficient for comparing independent phylogenetic trees. Systematic Biology, 41(3), 378-384.
32. Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. (1998), Numerical ecology (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
33. Manly, B.F.J. (1997). Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.
34. Mantel, N. (1967). A technique of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209-220.
35. Mantel, N., & Valand, R.S. (1970). A technique of nonparametric multi-variate analysis. Biometrics, 26, 547-558.
36. McCain. K.W., Verner, J.M., Hislop, G.W., Evanco, W., & Cole, V. (2005). The use of bibliometric and knowledge elicitation techniques to map a knowledge domain: Software engineering in the 1990s. Scientometrics, 65(1), 131-144.
37. Mielke, P.W. (1978). Clarification and appropriate inferences for Mantel and Valand non-parametric multivariate analysis technique. Biometrics, 34(2), 277-282.
38. Mosier, C.I. (1939). Determining a simple structure when loadings for certain tests are known. Psychometrika, 4, 149-162.
39. Nagpaul, P.S. (2003). Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 56(3), 403-416.
40. Ochiai, A. (1957). Zoogeographic studies on the soleoid fishes found in Japan and its neighbouring regions. Bulletins of the Japanese Society for Scientific Fisheries, 22, 526-530.
41. Pielou, E.C. (1984). The interpretation of ecological data: A primer on classification and ordination. New York: Wiley.
42. Rohlf, F.J., & Slice, D. (1990), Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39(1), 40-59.
43. Salton, G. (1963). Associative document retrieval techniques using bibliographic information. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 10, 440-457.
44. Samoylenko, I., Chao, T.-C., Liu, W.-C., & Chen, C.-M. (2006). Visualizing the scientific world and its evolution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1461-1469.
45. Schneider, J.W. (2004). Verification of bibliometric methods' applicability for thesaurus construction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Information Studies, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Aalborg, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
46. Schneider, J.W., & Borlund, P. (2007). Matrix comparison. Part 1: Motivation and important issues for measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 000-000.
47. Schönemann, P.H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31(1), 1-10.
48. Schönemann, P.H., & Carroll, R.M. (1970). Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion. Psychometrika, 35(2), 245-256.
49. Sibson, R. (1978). Studies in the robustness of multidimensional-scaling: Procrustes statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological, 40(2), 234-238.
50. Siegel, A.F., & Benson, R.H. (1982). A robust comparison of biological shapes. Biometrics, 38(2), 341-350.
51. Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics: For the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
52. Smouse, P.E., Long, J.C., & Sokal, R.R. (1986). Multiple-regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology, 35(4), 627-632.
53. Sneath, P., & Sokal, R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
54. Sneath, P.H.A. (1967). Trend-surface analysis of transformation grids. Journal of Zoology, 151, 65-122.
55. Sokal, R. (1979). Testing statistical significance of geographic variation patterns. Systematic Zoology, 28(2), 227-232.
56. Sokal, R., & Rohlf, F. (1962). The comparison of dendograms by objective methods. Taxon, 11, 33-40.
57. Ten Berge, J.M.F. (1977). Orthogonal procrustes rotation for two or more matrices. Psychometrika, 42(2), 267-276.
58. White, H.D. (2003). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(31), 250-259.
59. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
60. White, H.D., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" Interdisciplinary Research Group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 111-126.
61. Wolfram, D. (2003). Applied informetrics for information retrieval research. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
62. Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 152-168.