Matrix comparison, Part 1: Motivation and important issues for measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1586-1595

  Schneider, Jesper W ^a   Borlund, Pia ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; DATA ACQUISITION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

INFORMETRIC STUDIES; MANTEL TESTS; MATRIX COMPARISON; PROXIMITY MEASURES;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 34548584050     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20643     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
2. Anderberg, M. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press.
3. Austin, M.P. (1976). Performances of four ordination techniques assuming three different nonlinear response models. Vegetatio, 42, 11-21.
4. Åström, F. (2002). Visualizing library and information science concept spaces through keyword and citation based maps and clusters. In H. Bruce, R. Fidel, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (pp. 185-197). Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
5. Baroni-Urbani, C., & Buser, M.W. (1976). Similarity of binary data. Systematic Zoology, 25(3), 251-259.
6. Bellman, R.E. (1961). Adaptive control processes: A guided tour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Bensman, S.J. (2004). Pearson's r and author cocitation analysis: A commentary on the controversy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(10), 935-935.
8. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
9. Carroll, J.B. (1961). The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 26(4), 347-372.
10. Cox, T.F. (2005). An introduction to multivariate data analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.
11. Cox, T.F., & Cox, M.A.A. (2000). Multidimensional scaling (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
12. Cronbach, L.J., & Gleser, G.C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50(6), 456-473.
13. Dietz, E.J. (1983). Permutation tests for association between two distance matrices. Systematic Zoology, 32(1), 21-26.
14. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to Informetrics - Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Ellis, D., Furner-Hines, J., & Willett, P. (1993). Measuring the degree of similarity between objects in text retrieval systems. Perspectives in Information Management, 3(2), 128-149.
16. Everitt, B.S, (1979). Unresolved problems in cluster-analysis. Biometrics, 35(1), 169-181.
17. Everitt, B.S., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (1997). The analysis of proximity data. London: Arnold.
18. Fasham, M.J.R. (1977). Comparison of nonmetric multidimensional-scaling, principal components and reciprocal averaging for ordination of simulated coenoclines, and coenoplanes. Ecology, 58(3), 551-561.
19. Feger, H., & De Boeck, P. (1993). Categories and concepts: Introduction to data analysis. In J. van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R.S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis. London: Academic Press.
20. Gm̈r, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57.
21. Gordon, A.D. (1987). A review of hierarchical-classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 150, 119-137.
22. Gower, J.C. (1971). Statistical methods for comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In J.R. Hodson, D.G. Kendall & P. Tautu (Eds.), Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences (pp. 138-149). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
23. Gower, J.C., & Legendre, P. (1986). Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. Journal of Classification, 3(1), 5-48.
24. Hubálek, Z. (1982). Coefficients of associtation and similarity, based on binary (presence-absence) data: An evaluation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 57, 669-689.
25. Jaccard, P. (1901). Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines. [Distribution of alpine flora in the Basin of Dranses and some close areas]. Bulletin et la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37, 241-272.
26. Jackson, D.A., Somers, K.M., & Harvey, H.H. (1989). Similarity coefficients - Measures of co-occurrence and association or simply measures of occurrence. American Naturalist, 133(3), 436-453.
27. Jones, P.E., & Curtice, R.M. (1967). A framework for comparing term association measures. American Documentation, 18, 153-161.
28. Jones, W.P., & Furnas, G.W. (1987). Pictures of relevance: A geometric analysis of similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(6), 420-442.
29. Kenkel, N.C., & Orloci, L. (1986). Applying Metric and nonmetric multidimensional-scaling to ecological-studies - some new results. Ecology, 67(4), 919-928.
30. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251-263.
31. Krauze, T.K., & McGinnis, R. (1979). Matrix analysis of scientific specialties and careers in science. Scientometrics, 1(5-6), 419-444.
32. Kruskal, J.B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33. Krzanowski, W.J., & Marriott, F.H.C. (1994). Multivariate analysis, part 1: Distributions, ordination and inference. London: Edward Arnold.
34. Lattin, J., Carroll, J.D., & Green, P.E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole - Thompson Learning.
35. Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical ecology (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
36. Leydesdorff, L. (1987). Various methods for the mapping of science. Scientometrics, 11, 281-320.
37. Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Similarity measures, author cocitation analysis, and information theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 769-772.
38. Leydesdorff, L., & Bensman, S. (2006). Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1470-1486.
39. Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their application in information science: Extending ACA to the web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1616-1628.
40. Mantel, N. (1967). A technique of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209-220.
41. Mantel, N., & Valand, R.S. (1970). A technique of nonparametric multivariate analysis. Biometrics, 26, 547-558.
42. McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443.
43. McGill, M., Koll, M., & Noreault, T. (1979). An evaluation of factors affecting document ranking for information retrieval systems (NTIS Report No. PB80-119506). Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce.
44. Morris, S.A. (2005). Manifestation of emerging specialties in journal literature: A growth model of papers, references, exemplars, bibliographic coupling, cocitation, and clustering coefficient distribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1250-1273.
45. Mulaik, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Nicolaisen, J. (2004). Social behavior and scientific practice - missing pieces of the citation puzzle. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Information Studies, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen, Denmark.
47. Noma, E. (1982). An improved method for analyzing square scientometric transaction matrices. Scientometrics, 4(4), 297-316.
48. Oberski, J.E.J. (1988). Some statistical aspects of co-citation cluster analysis and a judgement by physicists. In A.F.J, van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp. 431-462). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
49. Ochiai, A. (1957). Zoogeographic studies on the soleoid fishes found in Japan and its neighbouring regions. Bulletins of the Japanese Society for Scientific Fisheries, 22, 526-530.
50. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research front of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38.
51. Pielou, E.C. (1984). The interpretation of ecological data: A primer on classification and ordination. New York: Wiley.
52. Price, D.J.D.S. (1981). The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transaction. Scientometrics, 3(1), 55-63.
53. Salton, G. (1963). Associative document retrieval techniques using bibliographic information. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 10, 440-457.
54. Salton, G. (1968). Automatic information organization and retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
55. Schneider, J.W., & Borlund, P. (2007). Matrix Comparison. Part 2: Measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results by use of the Mantel and Procrustes statistics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 000-000.
56. Schönemann, P.H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31(1), 1-10.
57. Schönemann, PH., & Carroll, R.M. (1970). Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion. Psychometrika, 35(2), 245-256.
58. Scott, D.W. (1992). Multivariate density estimation: Theory, practice, and visualization. New York: Wiley.
59. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
60. Small, H., & Greenlee, E. (1980). Citation context analysis of a co-citation cluster: Recombinant DNA. Scientometrics, 2(4), 277-301.
61. Small, H., & Griffith, B.C. (1974). The structure of scientific literature I: Identifying and graphing specialities. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.
62. Small, H., & Sweeney, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 391-409.
63. Small, H., Sweeney, E., & Greenlee, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics, 8(5-6), 321-340.
64. Sneath, P., & Sokal, R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
65. Tanimoto, T.T. (1958). An elementary mathematical theory of classification and prediction (IBM Internal Report). Armonk, NY: IBM.
66. Wang, Z.W., Wong, S.K.M., & Yao, Y.Y. (1992). An analysis of vector space models based on computational geometry. In N.J. Belkin, P. Ingwersen, & A.M. Pejtersen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 152-160). New York: ACM.
67. White, H.D. (2003a). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(31), 250-259.
68. White, H.D. (2003b). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423-434.
69. White, H.D., & Griffith, B.C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
70. Williams, W.T., Clifford, H.T., & Lance, G.N. (1971). Group-size dependence - rationale for choice between numerical classifications. Computer Journal, 14(2), 157-162.
71. Yule, G.U. (1912). On the methods of measuring association between two attributes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 75(6), 579-652.