Bibliographic coupling, common abstract stems and clustering: A comparison of two document-document similarity approaches in the context of science mapping

Scientometrics

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 273-290

  Ahlgren, Per ^a   Jarneving, Bo ^a  

^a Swedish School of Library and Information Science   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46749129689     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1935-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boyce, B., Meadow, C., Kraft, D. (1994). Measurement in Information Science. San Diego: Academic press.
2. Calado, P., Cristo, M., Moura, E., Ziviani, N., Ribeiro-Neto, B., Gonçalves, M. (2003). Combining link-based and content-based methods for web document classification. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 394-401.
3. Couto, T., Cristo, M., Gonçalves, M., Calado, P., Ziviani, N., Moura, E., Ribeiro-Neto, B. (2006). A Comparative study of citations and links in document classification. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 75-84.
4. th ed. London: Arnold.
5. Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., De Moor, B. (2005). Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1548-1572.
6. Hubert, L., Arabie. P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2(1): 193-218.
7. Janssens, F., Tran Quoc, V., Glänzel, W., De Moor, B. (2006). Integration of textual content and link information for accurate clustering of science fields. In: InSCit2006, Current Research in Information Sciences and Technologies: Multidsciplinary Approaches to Global Information Systems (Volume I). Badajoz: Open Institute of Knowledge, pp. 615-619.
8. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P. (1990). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Kendall, M., Gibbons, J. (1990). Rank correlation methods. 5th ed. London: Edward Arnold.
10. Kessler, M. M. (1963a). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1): 10-25.
11. Kessler, M. M. (1963b). Bibliographic coupling extended in time: ten case histories. Information Storage and Retrieval, 1(4): 169-187.
12. Kessler, M. M. (1965). Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexing. American Documentation, 16(3): 223-233.
13. Mojena, R. (1977). Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: an evaluation. Computer Journal, 20(4), 359-363.
14. Nilsson, M. (2002). Hierarchical clustering using non-greedy principal direction divisive partitioning. Information Retrieval, 5(4): 311-321.
15. Peters, H., Braam, R., Van Raan, A. (1995). Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1): 9-21.
16. Porter, M. (2001). Snowball: A language for stemming algorithms. URL http://snowball.tartarus.org/texts/introduction.html. Visited June 22nd, 2007.
17. Salton, G., Mcgill, M. (1983). Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Small, H., Koenig, M. (1977). Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method. Information Processing & Management, 13(5): 277-288.
19. Stopword List 1 (2000). The reference created 2007-08-04. URL: http://www.lextek.com/manuals/onix/stopwords1.html.
20. Vladutz, G., Cook, J. (1984). Bibliographic coupling and subject relatedness. Proceedings of the 47th ASIS Annual Meeting, 21, 204-207.
21. Wishart, D. (2005). Number of clusters. In: Everitt, B., Howell, D. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1442-1446.
22. Wishart, D. (2006). ClustanGraphics Primer: A Guide to Cluster Analysis. Edinburgh: Clustan Limited.