Oral squamous cell carcinoma grading systems - Analysis of the best survival predictor

Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 34-39

  de Castro Ribeiro Lindenblatt, Rhayany ^a   Martinez, Gisele Lago ^a   Silva, Licínio Esmeraldo ^a   Faria, Paulo Silvestre ^b   Camisasca, Danielle Resende ^a   de Queiroz Chaves Lourenço, Simone ^a  

^a FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Classification; Mouth neoplasms; Pathology; Squamous cell carcinoma; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SURVIVAL; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HISTOLOGIC RISK ASSESSMENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANCY GRADING OF THE DEEP INVASIVE MARGIN; MEDICAL RECORD; MULTIPARAMETER GRADING SYSTEM; ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GRADING SYSTEM;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; SURVIVAL RATE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 84855470010     PISSN: 09042512     EISSN: 16000714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2011.01068.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002.
2. Anneroth G, Batsakis J, Luna M. Review of the literature and a recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95: 229-49.
3. Kudo Y. Invasion and metastasis of oral cancer cells require methylation of E-cadherin and/or degradation of membranous - catenin. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 5455-63.
4. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichert P, et al. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005.
5. Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Lewis CM, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 167-78.
6. Broders AC. The microscopic grading of cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1941; 21: 947-62.
7. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R, et al. Mlignancy grading of the deep invasive margins of oral squamous cell carcinoma has high prognostic value. J Pathol 1992; 166: 375-81.
8. Martinez-Gimeno C, Rodrigues EM, Vila CN. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a clinicopathologic scoring system for evaluating risk of cervical lymph node metastasis. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 728-33.
9. Anneroth G, Batsakis J, Luna M. Malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma in the floor of the mouth related to clinical evaluation. Scand J Dent Res 1986; 94: 347-58.
10. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R, et al. Reproductibility of two malignancy grading systems with reportedly prognostic value for noral cancer. J Oral Pathol Med 1991; 20: 369-72.
11. Brandwein-Gensler M, Smith RV, Wang B, et al. Validation of the histologic risk model in a new cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34: 677-88.
12. Camisasca DR, Honorato J, Bernardo V, et al. Expression of Bcl-2 family proteins and associated clinicopathologic factors predict survival outcome in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2009; 45: 225-33.
13. Le CT. A Solution for the most basic optimization problem associated with an ROC curve. Stat Methods Med Res 2006; 15: 571-84.
14. Costa ALL, Pereira JC, Nunes AAF, et al. Correlation between TNM classification, histological grading and anatomical location in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2002; 16: 216-20.
15. Woolgar JA. Histopathological prognosticators in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2006; 42: 229-39.
16. Yazdi I, Khalili M. Grading of oral cancer: comparison of different systems with respect to lymph node metastasis in tongue SCC. Arch Iran Med 1999; 2: 87-92.
17. Weijers M, Snow GB, Bezemer PD, et al. Malignancy grading is no better than conventional histopathological grading in small squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and floor of mouth: retrospective study in 128 patients. J Oral Pathol Med 2009; 38: 343-7.
18. Costa ALL, Araújo Junior RF, Ramos CCF. Correlation between TNM classification and malignancy histological feature of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2005; 71: 181-7.
19. Aguiar Junior FCA, Kowalski L, Almeida OP. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of oral squamous cell carcinoma in patients with early local recurrence. Oral Oncol 2007; 43: 593-601.
20. Dedivitis RA, França CM, Mafra ACB, et al. Clinic and epidemiologic characteristics in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the mouth and oropharynx. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2004; 70: 35-40.
21. Kane SV, Gupta M, Kakade AC, et al. Depth of invasion is the most significant histological predictor of subclinical cervical lymph node metastasis in early squamous carcinomas of the oral cavity. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32: 795-803.
22. Jing J, Li L, He W, et al. Prognostic predictors of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa with negative surgical margins. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 896-901.
23. Leite ICG, Koifman S. Survival analysis in a sample of oral cancer patients at a reference hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Oral Oncol 1998; 34: 347-52.