Correlation between TNM classification and malignancy histological feature of oral squamous cell carcinoma;Correlação entre a classificação clínica TNM e as características histológicas de malignidade do carcinoma epidermoide oral

Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 181-187

  Costa, Antonio De L L ^a,d   De Araújo Jr , Raimundo F ^b   Ramos, Carlos C F ^c  

^a Departamento de Odontologia da UFRN   (Brazil)

^b Faculdade Santa Maria PB   (United States)

^c Luiz Antonio Hospital   (Brazil)

^d UFRN   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Histologic grading; Oral pathology; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Prognosis

Indexed keywords

EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAZIL; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KERATINIZATION; LYMPHOCYTIC INFILTRATION; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MOUTH CARCINOMA; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;

EID: 20344381322     PISSN: 00347299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-72992005000200011     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Pinêra K, Nogueira AC, Consolaro A. Determinação do teor alcoólico de anti-sépticos bucais e carcinogênese bucal quimica. Rev Bras Ciênc Estomatol 1996; 1: 13-7.
2. Zavras AI, Douglass CW, Joshipura K, Wu T, Laskaris G, Petridou E, Dokianakis G, Segas J, Lefantzis D, Nomikos P, Wang YF, Diehl SR. Smoking and alcohol in the etiology of oral cancer: gender-specific risk profiles in the south of Greece. Oral Oncology 2001; 37: 28-35.
3. nd ed., Philadelphia; 1994, p.321-39.
4. Costa ALL, Pereira JC, Nunes AAF, Arruda MLS. Correlação entre a classificação TNM, gradação histológica e classificação anatômica em carcinoma epidermóide oral. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2002; 16: 216-20.
5. Baatenburg RJ, Hermans J, Molennar J, Briaire JJ, Le Cessie S. Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2001; 44: 257-9.
6. O'Sullivan B, Shah J. New TNM staging criteria for head and neck tumours. Semin Surg Oncol 2003; 21: 3-7.
7. Macfarlane GJ, Boyle P, Scully C. Oral cancer in Scotland: changing incidence and mortality. Br Med J 1992; 305: 1121-3.
8. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R, Kjaerheim A. Malignancy grading of the deep invasive margins of oral squamous cell carcinomas has high prognostic value. J Pathol 1992; 166: 375-81.
9. Bryne M. Is the invasive front of an oral carcinoma the most important area for prognostication? Oral diseases 1998; 4: 70-7.
10. Dib LL, Sabba LMB, Marques LA, Araújo NS. Fatores prognósticos em carcinoma de borda de língua: análise clínica e histopatológica. Acta Oncológica Brasileira 1994; 14: 88-93.
11. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R. New malignancy grading is a better prognostic indicator than "Broders" grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. J Oral Pathol. Med 1989; 18: 432-7.
12. Hermanck P, Sobin HL, Fleming DI. What do we need beyond TNM? Cancer 1996; 77: 185-92.
13. a ed., Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1998. p. 1-705.
14. Woodhouse EC, Chuaqui RF, Liotta LA. General mechanisms of metastasis. Cancer supplement 1997; 80: 1529-34.
15. Lopes MA, Nikitakis NG, Reynolds MA, Ord RA, Sank J. Biomarkers predictive of lymphonode metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxill Surg 2002; 60: 142-7.
16. Colella G, Gabriele M, Lanza A, Tartaro GP, Giorgetti G. Clinical evaluation of patients with squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity. Minerva Stomatologia 1999; 48: 319-23.
17. Oliver AJ, Helfrick JF, Gard D, Primary oral squamous cell carcinoma: A review of 92 cases. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1996; 54: 949-55.
18. Varela-Centelles PI, Seoane J, Vasquez FE, De la Cruz A, Ansejo GJA. Survival to oral cancer. A study of clinical risk markers with independent prognostic value. Bull Group Int Rech Sch Stomatol Odontol 2002; 44: 46-51.
19. Bundgaard T, Bentzen SM, Wild TJ, Sorensen FB, Sogaard H, Nielsen JE. Histopathologic, stereologic, epidemiologic and clinical parameters in the prognostic evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Head & Neck 1996; 3: 142-52.
20. Anneroth G, Hansen LS. A methodologic study of histologic classification and grading of malignancy in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 5: 448-68.
21. Bryne M, Nielsen K, Koppang HS, Dabelsteen E. Reproducibility of two malignancy grading systems with reportedly prognostic value for oral cancer patients. J Oral Pathol Med 1991; 20: 369-72.
22. Brown B, Barnes L, Mazariegos J, Taylor F, Johnson J, Wagner RL. Prognostic factors in mobile tongue and floor of mouth carcinoma. J oral Maxillofac. Surg 1998; 56: 832-6.
23. Odell EW, Path MRC, Jani P, Sherriff M, Ahluwalia SM, Hibbert J, Levison DA, Path FRC, Morgan PR. The prognostic value of individual histologic grading parameters in small lingual squamous cell carcinomas, Cancer 1994; 74: 789-93.
24. Subdo J, Bankfalvi A, Byrne M, Marcelpoil R, Boysen M, Piffko J, Hemmer J, Kraft K, Reith A. Prognostic value of graph theory-Based tissue architecture analysis in carcinoma of the tongue. Laboratory investigation 2000; 80: 1881-9.
25. Broders AC. Squamous epithelioma of the lip: a study of live hundred and thirty-seven cases. J Am Med Assoc 1920; 74: 656-64.
26. Jakobsson PA, Anneroth CM, Killander D. Histologic classification and grading of malignancy in carcinoma of the larynx. Acta Radiol 1973; 12: 1-8.
27. Anneroth G, Batsakis J, Luna M. Review of the literature and a recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Scand. Dent. Res 1987; 95: 229-49.