Validation of the histologic risk model in a new cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 676-688

  Brandwein Gensler, Margaret ^a,k   Smith, Richard V ^b   Wang, Beverly ^e   Penner, Carla ^e   Theilken, Andrea ⁱ   Broughel, Darcy ^a   Schiff, Bradley ^b   Owen, Randall P ^c,h   Smith, Jonathan ^b   Sarta, Cathy ^b   Hebert, Tiffany ^a   Nason, Rick ^j   Ramer, Marie ^f   De Lacure, Mark ^g   Hirsch, David ^h   Myssiorek, David ^g   Heller, Keith ^h   Prystowsky, Michael ^a   Schlecht, Nicolas F ^c   Negassa, Abdissa ^d  

^a Departments of Pathology   (United States)

^b Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery   (Australia)

^c Department of Surgery ^*  (Australia)

^d Division of Biostatistics   (United States)

^e Departments of Pathology   (Australia)

^f Departments of Otolaryngology   (Australia)

^g NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^k University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Laryngeal; Lymphocytic host; Oral; Oropharyngeal; Response; Risk model squamous carcinoma head and neck pattern of invasion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK TUMOR; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL RATE; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MANITOBA; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK CITY; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 77951818491     PISSN: 01475185     EISSN: 15320979     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181d95c37     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anneroth G, Batsakis J, Luna M. Review of the literature and a recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Scan J Dent Res. 1987;95:229-249.
2. Brandwein-Gensler M, Lewis C, Lee B, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histological risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;20:167-178. (Pubitemid 40170634)
3. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R, et al. New malignancy grading is a better prognostic indicator than Broders' grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. J Oral Pathol Med. 1989;18: 432-437. (Pubitemid 20057773)
4. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R, et al. Malignancy grading of the deep invasive margins of oral squamous cell carcinomas has high prognostic value. J Pathol. 1992;166:375-381.
5. Bryne M, Jenssen N, Boysen M. Histologic grading in the deep invasive front of T1 and T2 glottic squamous cell carcinomas has high prognostic value. Virchows Arch. 1995;427:277-281.
6. Bundgaard T, Rossen K, Henriksen SD, et al. Histologic parameters in the evaluation of T1 squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity. Head Neck. 2002;24:656-660. (Pubitemid 34734361)
7. Fagan JJ, Collins B, Barnes L, et al. Perineural invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:637-640. (Pubitemid 28272928)
8. Jakobsson PA, Eneroth CM, Killander D, et al. Histologic classification and grading of malignancy in carcinoma of the larynx. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol. 1973;12:1-8.
9. Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, et al. Perineural invasion in cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:3379-3391.
10. Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138:923-936. (Pubitemid 24002359)
11. McMahon J, O'Brien CJO, Pathak I, et al. Influence of condition of surgical margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2003;41:224-231. (Pubitemid 37184459)
12. Odell EW, Jani P, Sherriff M, et al. The prognostic value of individual histologic grading parameters in small lingual squamous cell carcinomas. The importance of the pattern of invasion. Cancer. 1994;74:789-794. (Pubitemid 24237456)
13. Po WYA, Lam KY, Lam LK, et al. Prognostic factors of clinically stage I and II oral tongue carcinoma. A comparative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern, invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score, and pathologic features. Head Neck. 2002;24:513-520.
14. Rahima B, Shingaki S, Nagata M, et al. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97: 423-431. (Pubitemid 38496293)
15. Sawair FA, Irwin CR, Gordon DJ, et al. Invasive front grading: reliability and usefulness in the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2003;32:1-9. (Pubitemid 36603927)
16. Sessions DG, Spector GJ, Lenox J, et al. Analysis of treatment results for oral tongue cancer. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:616-625. (Pubitemid 34285925)
17. Sethi S, Lu M, Kapke A, et al. Patient and tumor factors at diagnosis in a multi-ethnic primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cohort. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:104-108.
18. Soo KC, Carter RL, O'Brien CJ, et al. Prognostic implications of perineural spread in squamous carcinomas of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 1986;96:1145-1148. (Pubitemid 17177372)
19. Vered M, Dobriyan A, Dayan D, et al. Tumor-host histopatho-logic variables, stromal myofibroblasts and risk score, are significantly associated with recurrent disease in tongue cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:274-280.
20. Warburton G, Nikitakis NG, Roberson P, et al. Histopatholo-gical and lymphangiogenic parameters in relation to lymph node metastasis in early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:475-484. (Pubitemid 46343583)