Influences of ligand density and pore size on BSA adsorption on agarose-based DEAE-ion-exchange resins

Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal

Volumn 62, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3164-3170

  Lu, Huili ^a   Lin, Dongqiang ^a   Yao, Shanjing ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Ion exchange chromatography; Ligand density; Pore size; Protein adsorption

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION KINETICS; AGAROSE; AGAROSE GEL; ANIONIC LIGANDS; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMINS; BSA ADSORPTION; ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY; IONIC EXCHANGE; LIGAND DENSITY; NAOH CONCENTRATION; PORE DIFFUSIVITY; PREPARATION CONDITIONS; PROTEIN ADSORPTION; REACTION TEMPERATURE; SATURATED ADSORPTION CAPACITY; SEPARATION BEHAVIORS; STATIC AND DYNAMIC;

ADSORPTION; BODY FLUIDS; CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; DYES; ION CHROMATOGRAPHY; IONS; LIGANDS; PORE SIZE; PROTEINS;

ION EXCHANGE;

EID: 84855465281     PISSN: 04381157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2011.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ali I, Aboul-Enein H Y, Singh P, Singh R, Sharma B. Separation of biological proteins by liquid chromatography[J]. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 2010, 18(2): 59-73.
2. Levison P R. Large-scale ion-exchange column chromatography of proteins: comparison of different formats[J]. Journal of Chromatography B, 2003, 790(1/2): 17-33.
3. Chen Weidong, Sun Yan. Analysis of steric mass-action model for protein ion-exchange equilibrium[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2002, 53(1): 88-91.
4. Kopaciewicz W, Regnier F E. Mobile phase selection for the high-performance ion-exchange chromatography of proteins[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1983, 133(1): 251-259.
5. Franke A, Forrer N, Butte A, Cvijetic B, Morbidelli M, Johnck M, Schulte M. Role of the ligand density in cation exchange materials for the purification of proteins[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2010, 1217(15): 2216-2225.
6. Hardin A M, Harinarayan C, Malmquist G, Axen A, Van Reis R. Ion exchange chromatography of monoclonal antibodies: effect of resin ligand density on dynamic binding capacity[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2009, 1216(20): 4366-4371.
7. Mccue J T, Engel P, Thommes J. Effect of phenyl Sepharose ligand density on protein monomer/aggregate purification and separation using hydrophobic interaction chromatography[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2009, 1216(6): 902-909.
8. Wrzosek K, Gramblicka M, Polakovic M. Influence of ligand density on antibody binding capacity of cation-exchange adsorbents[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2009, 1216(25): 5039-5044.
9. Zhang L, Zhao G, Sun Y. Effects of ligand density on hydrophobic charge induction chromatography: molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2010, 114(6): 2203-2211.
10. Wang Guoxiang, Nie Fengguang, Su Zhiguo. Coupling reaction of diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) onto agarose gel[J]. Chemical Reaction Engineering and Technology, 2002, 18(1): 910-918.
11. Shen Zui, Lin Dongqiang, Yao Shanjing. Determination of pore size distribution of porous media by inverse size-exclusion chromatography[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(4): 867-874.
12. Xia H F, Lin D Q, Yao S J. Chromatographic performance of macroporous cellulose-tungsten carbide composite beads as anion-exchanger for expanded bed adsorption at high fluid velocity[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2008, 1195(1/2): 60-66.
13. Chen W D, Dong X Y, Sun Y. Analysis of diffusion models for protein adsorption to porous anion-exchange adsorbent[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2002, 962(1/2): 29-40.
14. Yang K, Sun Y. Structured parallel diffusion model for intraparticle mass transport of proteins to porous adsorbent[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 37(3): 298-310.
15. Gao D, Lin D Q, Yao S J. Protein adsorption kinetics of mixed-mode adsorbent with benzylamine as functional ligand[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(22): 7260-7268.