Theoretical understanding of C-H....π interactions and their distribution in immunoglobulin proteinsinsilco geometrical approach

International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2011, Pages 212-218

  Tayubi, Iftikhar Aslam ^a   Sethumadhavan, Rao ^a  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

C H.... ; Conservation score; Interactions; Interactions range; Secondary structure; Solvent accessibility

Indexed keywords

CATION; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; PEPTIDE; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPUTER MODEL; GEOMETRY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY;

EID: 84855457724     PISSN: None     EISSN: 09751491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Gromiha MM, Thomas S, and Santhosh C. Role of cation-pi interactions to the stability of thermophilic proteins. Prep. Biochem.Biotech.2002; 32: 355-362.
2. Chakravarty S, Varadarajan R. Elucidation of factors responsible for enhanced thermal stability of proteins: A structural genomics based study.Biochemistry.2002; 41: 8152-8161.
3. Shi Z, Olson CA, Kallenbach NR. Cation-pi interaction in model alpha-helical peptides. J. A., Chem. Soc.2002; 124: 3284-3291.
4. Burghardt TP, N. Juranic S Macura, Ajtai K. Cation-π interaction in a folded polypeptide. Biopolymers, 2002; 63: 261-272.
5. Mulhern TD, Lopez AF, Andrea'd RJ, Gaunt C, Vandeleur L, Vadas MA, Booker GW, Bagley CJ. Peptide insertions in domain 4 of hβc, the shared signaling receptor subunit for gm-csf, il3 and il5, induce ligand-independent activation. J. Mol. Biol, 2000; 297: 989-1001.
6. Gromiha MM. Distinct roles of conventional non-covalent and cation-π interactions in protein stability. Biophys. Chem. 2003; 103: 251-258.
7. Harpaz Y, Chothia C, Members of the immunoglobulin superfamily in bacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 238 (4): 528-39.
8. Barclay A. Membrane proteins with immunoglobulin-like domains-a master super family of interaction molecules. Semin, Immunol. 2003; 15 (4): 215-23.
9. Gallivan JP, Dougherty DA. Cation-π interactions in structural biology. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999; 96: 9459-9464.
10. Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding, Perspect. Biochem. 1990; 29: 7133-7155.
11. Tamres M. Aromatic Compounds as Donor Molecules in Hydrogen Bonding. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1952; 74: 3375-3378.
12. Reeves LW, Schneider WG. Nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of complexes of chloroform with aromatic molecules and olefins. Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 1957; 35: 251-261.
13. Nishio M, Hirota M, Umezawa Y. (Eds.). The CH/π Interaction, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1998.
14. Matsui I, Matsui E, Sakai Y, Kikuchi H, Kawarabayasi Y, Ura H, Kawaguchi S, Kuramitsu S, Harata K. The molecular structure of hyperthermostable aromatic amino transferase with novel substrate specificity from Pyrococcus horikoshii. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000; 275: 4871-4879
15. Chakrabarti P, Samanta U. CH/π interaction in the packing of the adenine ring in protein structures. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1995; 251: 9-14.
16. Umezawa Y, Nishio M. CH/π interactions as demonstrated in the crystal structure of guanine nucleotide binding proteins, Src homology-2 domains and human growth hormone in complex with their specific ligands. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 1986; 493-504.
17. Muraki M, Harata K, Sugita N, Sato K I. Protein-carbohydrate interactions in human lysozyme probed by combining sitedirected mutagenesis and affinity labeling. Biochemistry. 2000; 39: 292-299.
18. Jabs A, Weiss MS, Hilgenfeld R. CH/π interactions in the crystal structure of class I MHC antigens and their complexes with peptides. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1999; 286: 291-304.
19. Shimohigashi Y, Maeda I, Nose T, Ikesue K, Sakamoto H, Ogawa Y. et al. Chymotrypsin Inhibitory conformation induced by amino acid side-chain-side-chain intermolecular CH/π Interaction. Journal of the Chemical Society. 1996; 1: 2479-2485.
20. Shimohigashi Y, Nose T, Yamauchi Y, Maeda I. Design of serine protease inhibitors with conformation restricted by amino acid side-chain side-chain CH/π interaction. Biopolymers. 1999; 51: 9-17.
21. Steiner T. The hydrogen bond in the solid state. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 2002; 41: 48-76.
22. Steiner T, Koellner GJ. Hydrogen bonds with π-acceptors in proteins frequencies and role in stabilizing local 3D structures. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2001; 305: 535-557.
23. Meyer EA, Castellano RK, Diederich F. Interactions with aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 2003; 42: 1210-1250.
24. Tayubi IA, Sethumadhavan R. Nature of cation-π interactions and its role in structural stability in Immunoglobulin proteins. Biochemistry. Moscow. 2010; 75 (7): 1-1.
25. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28: 235-242.
26. Tiwari A, Panigrahi SK. HBAT: A complete package for analyzing strong and weak hydrogen bonds in macromolecular crystal structures. In Silico Biology. 2007; 7: 0057.
27. Babu MM. NCI: a server to identify non-canonical interactions in protein Structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(13):3345-8.
28. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Fawareh H, Sarai A. ASA View. Database and tool for solvent accessibility representation in proteins. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004; 5: 51
29. Gilis D, Rooman M. Stability changes upon mutation of solvent accessible residues in proteins evaluated by database-derived potentials. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1996; 257: 1112-1126.
30. Gilis D, Rooman M. Predicting protein stability changes upon mutation using database derived potentials: solvent accessibility determines the importance of local versus non local interactions along the sequence. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1997; 272: 276-290.
31. Gromiha MM Selvaraj S. Influence of medium and long range interactions in different structural classes of globular proteins. Journal of Biological Physics. 1997; 23:151162.
32. Gromiha MM, Santhosh C, Ahmad S. Structural analysis of cation-π interactions in DNA binding proteins. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2004; 34: 203-211.
33. Selvaraj S, Gromiha MM. Role of hydrophobic clusters and long range contact networks in the folding of (alpha/beta) 8 barrel proteins. Biophysical Journal. 2003; 84:1919-1925.
34. Gromiha MM, Selvaraj S. Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability. 35. Progress. Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2004; 86: 235-277.
35. Dosztanyi ZS, Fiser A, Simon I. Stabilization centers: J.Mol Biol. 1997; 272: 597-612.
36. Dosztanyi ZS, Magyar CS, Tusnady E, Simon I. SCide: Identification of stabilization centers in proteins. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19: 899-900.
37. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor D, Martz E, et al. Consurf. Identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19: 163-164.
38. Boeckman B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter MC, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, et al. The Swiss prot protein knowledge base and its supplement TrEMBL. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003; 31:365-370.
39. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983; 22: 2577-2637.
40. Brandl M, Weiss MS, Jabs A, Sühnel J, Hilgenfeld R. C-H....π interactions in proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2001; 307: 357-377.
41. Barlow DJ, Thornton JM. Ion-pairs in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1983; 168: 867-885.
42. Matthews BW. Structural and Genetic Analysis of Protein Stability. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 1993; 62:139-160.