Combined use of a transformed red mud reactive barrier and electrokinetics for remediation of Cr/As contaminated soil

Chemosphere

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 400-408

  Cappai, G ^a   De Gioannis, G ^a   Muntoni, A ^a,c   Spiga, D ^a   Zijlstra, J J P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

^b GeoChemTec   (Italy)

^c IGAG CNR (Environmental Geology and Geoengineering Inst of the National Research Council)   (Italy)

Author keywords

Arsenate; Chromate; Electrokinetic remediation; Reactive barrier; Transformed red mud

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANODES; CHROMATES; EFFICIENCY; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; IRON OXIDES; REMEDIATION; SOILS;

ALUMINA PRODUCTION; ARSENATE; COMBINED TREATMENT; CONTAMINATED SOILS; ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATION; REACTIVE BARRIERS; RED MUD; REMOVAL OF CHROMIUM;

SOIL POLLUTION;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ARSENIC; CHROMIUM; IRON OXIDE;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ARSENIC; BAUXITE; CHROMIUM; CLAY SOIL; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ELECTROKINESIS; IRON OXIDE; MUD; PERMEABILITY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; REACTIVE BARRIER; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL REMEDIATION;

ARTICLE; CLAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; PERMEABILITY; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TREATMENT;

EID: 84855447141     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.10.053     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Altundogan H.S., Altundogan S., Tumen F., Bildik M. Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. Waste Manag. 2002, 22:357-363.
2. Altundogan H.S., Tumen F. Removal of phosphates from aqueous solutions by using bauxite II: The activation study. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2003, 78:824-833.
3. Apak R., Guclu K., Tugut M.H. Modelling of copper(II), cadmium(II) and lead(II) adsorption on red mud. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 203:122-130.
4. Apak R., Tutem E., Hugul M., Hizal J. Heavy metal cation retention by unconventional sorbents (red muds and fly ashes). Water Res. 1998, 32:430-440.
5. Baek K., Kim D.H., Park S.W., Ryu B.G. Electrolyte conditioning-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of arsenic-contaminated mine tailing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161:457-462.
6. Bertocchi A.F., Ghiani M., Peretti R., Zucca A. Red mud and fly ash for remediation of mine sites contaminated with As, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, B134:112-119.
7. Cang L., Zhou D.M., Alshawabkeh A.N., Chen H.F. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and high buffer solution in electrokinetic soil treatment on soil chromium removal and the functional diversity of soil microbial community. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 142:111-117.
8. Cang L., Zhou D.M., Wu D.Y., Alshawabkeh A.M. Coupling electrokinetics with permeable reactive barriers of zero-valent iron for treating a chromium contaminated soil. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44:2188-2202.
9. Cenc-Fuhrmann H., Tjell J.C., McConchie D. Adsorption of arsenic from water using activated neutralized red mud. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:2428-2434.
10. Cengeloglu Y., Kir E., Ersoz M. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by using red mud. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 28:81-86.
11. Chung H.I., Lee M. A new method for remedial treatment of contaminated clayey soils by electrokinetics coupled with permeable reactive barriers. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52:3427-3433.
12. Clark M., Berry J., McConchie D. The long-term stability of a metal-laden Bauxsol™ reagent under different geochemical conditions. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2009, 9:101-112.
13. Erdem M., Altundogan H.S., Tümen F. Removal of hexavalent chromium by using heat-activated bauxite. Miner. Eng. 2004, 17:1045-1052.
14. Garcia-Sanchez A., Alvarez-Ayuso E., Rodriguez-Martin F. Sorption of As(V) by some oxyhydroxides and clay minerals. Application to its immobilization in two polluted mining soils. Clay Miner. 2002, 37:187-194.
15. Genç H., Tjell J.C., McConchie D., Schuiling O. Adsorption of arsenate from water using neutralized red mud. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 264:327-334.
16. Gent D.B., Bricka R.M., Alshawabkeh A.N., Larson S.L., Fabian G., Granade S. Bench- and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 110:53-62.
17. Grafe, M., Power, G., Klauber, C., 2009. Review of Bauxite Residue Alkalinity and Associated Chemistry, CSIRO Document DMR-3610, Project ATF-06-3 "Management of Bauxite Residues", Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism, Australian Government.
18. Gupta V.K., Gupta M., Sharma S. Process development for the removal of lead and chromium from aqueous solutions using red mud-an aluminium industry waste. Water Res. 2001, 35:1125-1134.
19. Hanahan C., McConchie D., Pohl J., Creelman R., Clark M., Stocksiek C. Chemistry of seawater neutralization of bauxite residues (red mud). Environ. Eng. Sci. 2004, 21:125-138.
20. Kim S.O., Kim W.S., Kim K.W. Evaluation of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils. Environ. Geochem. Health 2005, 27:443-453.
21. Kumar S., Kumar R., Bandopadhyay A. Innovative methodologies for the utilisation of wastes from metallurgical and allied industries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2006, 48:301-314.
22. Lapointe F., Fytas K., McConchie D. Efficiency of bauxsol™ in permeable reactive barriers to treat acid rock drainage. Mine Water Environ. 2006, 25:37-44.
23. Liu C.J., Li Y.Z., Luan Z.K., Chen Z.Y., Zhang Z.G., Jia Z.P. Adsorption removal of phosphate from aqueous solution by active red mud. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 19:1166-1170.
24. Maini G., Sharman A.K., Knowles C.J., Sunderland G., Jackman S.A. Electrokinetic remediation of metals and organics from historically contaminated soil. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2000, 75:657-664.
25. McConchie, D., Saenger, P., Fawkes, R., 1996. An environmental assessment of the use of seawater to neutralise bauxite refinery wastes. In: Ramachandran, V., Nesbitt, C.C., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium On Extraction and Processing for the Treatment and Minimisation of Wastes. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Soc., Scottsdale Arizona, pp. 407-416.
26. Ottosen L.M., Hansen H.K., Bech-Nielsen G., Villumsen A. Electrodialytic remediation of an arsenic and copper polluted soil - continuous addition of ammonia during the process. Environ. Technol. 2000, 21:1421-1428.
27. Ottosen L.M., Hansen H.K., Jensen P.E., Fawkes R. Electrokinetic removal of heavy metals. Electrochemical Remediation Technologies for Polluted Soils, Sediments and Groundwater 2009, 97-126. Metals and Materials Soc., John Wiley, New York. K.R. Reddy, C. Cameselle (Eds.).
28. Paradis M., Duchesne J., Lamontagne A., Isabel D. Long-term neutralisation potential of red mud bauxite with brine amendment for the neutralisation of acidic mine tailings. Appl. Geochem. 2007, 22:2326-2333.
29. Pierce M.L., Moore C.M. Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron hydroxide. Water Res. 1982, 16:1247-1253.
30. Reddy K.R., Cameselle C. Overview of electrokemical remediation technologies. Electrochemical Remediation Technologies for Polluted Soils, Sediments and Groundwater. The Minerals 2009, 3-28. Metals and Materials Soc., John Wiley, New York. K.R. Reddy, C. Cameselle (Eds.).
31. Reddy K.R., Chinthamreddy S. Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils under reducing environments. Waste Manag. 1999, 19:269-282.
32. Reddy K.R., Chinthamreddy S. Effects of initial form of chromium on electrokinetic remediation in clays. Adv. Environ. Res. 2003, 7:353-365.
33. Reddy K.R., Chinthamreddy S. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in glacial till soils using different electrolyte solutions. J. Environ. Eng. 2004, 130:442-455.
34. Reddy K.R., Parupudi U.S., Devulapalli S.N., Xu C.Y. Effects of soil composition on the removal of chromium by electrokinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 1997, 55:135-158.
35. Ribeiro, A.B., Villumsem, A., Bech-Nielsen, G., Refega, A., Vieira e Silva, J., 1998. Electrodialytic remediation of a soil from a wood preservation industry polluted by CCA. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wood Preservation, Paper No. 50101:14.
36. Ricart M.T., Hansen H.K., Cameselle C., Lema J.M. Electrochemical treatment of a polluted sludge: different methods and conditions for manganese removal. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:3679-3689.
37. Wang S., Mulligan C.N. Natural attenuation processes for remediation of arsenic contaminated soils and groundwater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, B138:459-470.
38. Weng C.H., Lin Y., Lin T.Y., Kao C.M. Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of hyper-Cr(VI) contaminated clay by zero-valent iron. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 149:292-302.
39. Wieczorek S., Weigand H., Schmid M., Marb C. Electrokinetic remediation of an electroplating site: design and scale-up for an in-situ application in the unsaturated zone. Eng. Geology 2005, 77:203-215.
40. Yuan C., Chiang T.S. The mechanism of arsenic removal from soil by electrokinetic process coupled with iron permeable reaction barrier. Chemosphere 2007, 67:1533-1542.
41. Yuan C., Chiang T.S. Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic spiked soil by chemical reagents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152:309-315.
42. Yuan C., Hung C.H., Chen K.C. Electrokinetic remediation of arsenate spiked soil assisted by CNT-Co barrier - the effect of barrier position and processing fluid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171:563-570.
43. Zijlstra, J.J.P., Bellò, V., Ruggeri, R., Teodosi, A., 2005. The BAUXSOLTM Technology: An innovative solution for environmental remediation problems. In: Cossu, R., Stegmann, R. (Eds.), Proceedings Sardinia Tenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, pp. 1019-1020.