Electrokinetic remediation of arsenate spiked soil assisted by CNT-Co barrier-The effect of barrier position and processing fluid

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 171, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 563-570

  Yuan, Ching ^a   Hung, Chung Hsuang ^b   Chen, Kun Cho ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KAOHSIUNG   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Arsenic; Carbon nanotube; Electrokinetic; Nano composite; Soil remediation

Indexed keywords

AS REMOVAL; ELECTROKINETIC; ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATION; MN OXIDES; PASSIVE LAYER; PERMEABLE REACTION BARRIERS; POTENTIAL GRADIENTS; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SEM; SEQUENTIAL EXTRACTION; SOIL REMEDIATION; STRONG BINDING; SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS; SURFACE SORPTIONS; WEAK BINDING;

ARSENIC; BINDING ENERGY; CARBON NANOTUBES; COBALT; ELECTRODYNAMICS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; MANGANESE; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; NANOCOMPOSITES; REMEDIATION; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS; SORPTION;

REMOVAL;

ARSENIC ACID; CARBON NANOTUBE; CARBONIC ACID; COBALT; EDETIC ACID; GROUND WATER; IRON; MANGANESE OXIDE;

ARSENATE; ARSENIC; ELECTROKINESIS; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL REMEDIATION;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BIOREMEDIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROOSMOSIS; HEAVY METAL REMOVAL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; SOIL POLLUTION;

ADSORPTION; ARSENIC; EDETIC ACID; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; KINETICS; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOTUBES, CARBON; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 70349379716     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.059     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Leinz R.W., Hoover D.B., and Meier A.L. EOCHIM: an electrochemical method for environmental application. J. Geochem. Explor. 64 (2000) 421-434
2. Smedley P.L., and Kinniburgh D.G. A review of source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem. 17 (2002) 517-568
3. Tokunaga S., and Hakuta T. Acid washing and stabilization of an artificial arsenic-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 46 (2002) 31-38
4. Acar Y.B., and Alshawabkeh A.N. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27 (1993) 2638-2647
5. Puppala S.K., Alshawabkeh A.N., Acar Y.B., Gale R.J., and Bricka M. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of high sorption capacity soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 55 (1997) 203-220
6. Saichek R.E., and Reddy K.R. Effect of pH control at the anode from the electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene for kaolin soil. Chemosphere 51 (2003) 273-287
7. Reddy K.R., and Chinthamreddy S. Effect of initial form of chromium on electrokinetic remediation in clays. Adv. Environ. Res. 7 (2003) 353-365
8. Zhou D.M., Deng C.F., and Cang L. Electrokinetic remediation of a Cu contaminated red soil by conditioning catholyte pH with different enhancing chemical reagents. Chemosphere 56 (2004) 265-273
9. Redd B.E., Berg M.T., Thompson J.C., and Hatfield J.H. Chemical conditioning of electrode reservoir during electrokinetic soil flushing of Pb-contaminated silt loam. J. Environ. Eng. 121 (1995) 805-815
10. Reddy K.R., Danda S., and Saichek R.E. Complicating factors of using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid to enhance electrokinetic remediation of multiple heavy metals in clayey soils. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 130 (2004) 1357-1366
11. Kim W.S., Kim S.O., and Kim K.W. Enhanced electrokinetic extraction of heavy metals from soils associated by ion exchange membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 118 (2005) 93-102
12. Amrate S., Akretche D.E., Innocent C., and Seta P. Removal of Pb for a calcareous soil during EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction. Sci. Total Environ. 349 (2005) 56-66
13. Yuan C., and Chiang T.S. Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic spiked soil by chemical reagents. J. Hazard. Mater. 152 (2008) 309-315
14. Su C., and Puls R.W. Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: effects of phosphate, silicate, carbonate, borate, sulfate, chromate, molybdate, and nitrate, relative to chloride. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 4562-4568
15. Morrison S. Performance evaluation of a permeable reactive barrier using reaction products as tracers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (2003) 2302-2309
16. Farrell J., Wang J., O'Day P., and Conklin M. Electrochemical and spectroscopic study of arsenic removal from water using zero-valent iron media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 2026-2032
17. Zhang W., Singh P., Paling E., and Delides S. Arsenic removal from contaminated water by natural iron ores. Miner. Eng. 17 (2004) 517-524
18. Bednar A., Garbarino J.R., Ranville J.F., and Wildeman T.R. Effects of iron on arsenic speciation and redox chemistry in acid mine water. J. Geochem. Explor. 85 (2005) 55-62
19. Yuan C., and Chiang T.S. The mechanisms of arsenic removal from soil by electrokinetic process coupled with iron permeable reaction barrier. Chemosphere 67 (2007) 1533-1542
20. Chung H.I., and Lee M.H. A new method for remedial treatment of contaminated clayey soils by electrokinetics coupled with permeable reactive barriers. Electrochim. Acta 52 (2007) 3427-3431
21. Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page L.A., Miller R.H., and Keeney D.R. (Eds). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 (1982), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA 539-579
22. 2/HCl digestion method, 2002.
23. Chrysikopoulos C.V., and Kruger P. Investigation of soluble indium chelates for groundwater and hydrothermal fluid tracing. Appl. Geochem. 2 (1987) 329-335
24. 4 solution. Mater. Lett. 59 (2005) 1748-1751
25. Chao T.T., and Sanzolone R.F. Chemical dissociation of sulfide minerals. J. Res. US Geol. Surv. 5 (1983) 409-412
26. Chao T.T., and Sanzolone R.F. Fractionation of soil selenium by sequential partial dissolution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53 (1989) 385-392
27. Cardoso Fonseca E., and Ferreira da Silva E. Application of selective extraction techniques in metal-bearing phases identification: a South European case study. J. Geochem. Explor. 61 (1998) 203-212
28. Dold B. Speciation of the most soluble phases in a sequential extraction procedure adapted for geochemical studies of copper sulfide mine waste. J. Geochem. Explor. 80 (2003) 55-68
29. Dold B., and Fontboté L. A mineralogical and geochemical study of element mobility in sulfide mine tailings of the Fe-oxide Cu-Au deposits from Punta and Cobre district, northern Chili. Chem. Geol. 189 (2002) 135-163
30. Bailar J.C. Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry vol. 3 (1973), Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.
31. Lackovic J.A., Nikolaidis N.P., and Dobbs G.M. Inorganic arsenic removal by zero-valent iron. Environ. Eng. Sci. 17 (2000) 29-39
32. Kim S.O., Moon S.H., Kim K.W., and Yun S.T. Pilot scale study on the ex situ electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from municipal wastewater sludges. Water Res. 36 (2002) 4765-4774
33. Jacobs R.A., Senguin M.Z., Hicks R.E., and Probstein R.F. Model and experiments on soil remediation by electric fields. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A 29 (1994) 1933-1955
34. Gent D.B., Bricka R.M., Alshawabkeh A.N., Larson S.L., Fabrian G., and Granade S. Bench- and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 110 (2004) 53-62
35. Virkutyte J., Sillanpaa M., and Latostenmaa P. Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 289 (2002) 97-121