Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of hyper-Cr(VI) contaminated clay by zero-valent iron

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 149, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 292-302

  Weng, Chih Huang ^a   Lin, Yao Tung ^b   Lin, T Y ^c   Kao, C M ^d  

^a I SHOU UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Chromium; Clay; Electrokinetic; Remediation; Soil treatment; Zero valent iron

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; CLAY; CONTAMINATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTROOSMOSIS; PRECIPITATES;

ELECTROKINETIC; REDUCTION EFFICIENCIES;

SOIL POLLUTION CONTROL;

CHROMIUM; IRON;

CHROMIUM; CLAY; CONTAMINATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTROOSMOSIS; PRECIPITATES; SOIL POLLUTION CONTROL;

CHROMIUM; CLAY; ELECTROKINESIS; SOIL DEGRADATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL REMEDIATION;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY; CLAY; ELECTROOSMOSIS; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PH; PROTON TRANSPORT; SOIL ANALYSIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; CHROMIUM; ELECTRODES; ELECTRONS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; IRON; KINETICS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OXIDATION-REDUCTION;

EID: 34748893146     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.076     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Stepniewska Z., and Bucior K. Chromium contamination of soils, waters, and plants in the vicinity of a tannery water lagoon. Environ. Geochem. Health 23 3 (2001) 241-245
2. He Y.T., and Traina S.J. Cr(VI) reduction and immobilization by magnetite under alkaline pH conditions: the role of passivation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 12 (2005) 4499-4504
3. James B. Remediation-by-reduction strategies for chromate contaminated soils. Environ. Geochem. Health 23 3 (2001) 175-179
4. Smith W.L. Hexavalent chromium reduction and precipitation by sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms. Environ. Geochem. Health 23 3 (2001) 297-300
5. Alshawabkeh A.N., Yeung A.T., and Bricka M.R. Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction. J. Environ. Eng. 125 1 (1999) 27-35
6. Yalcin B., Li H., and Gale R.J. Phenol removal from kaolinite by electrokinetics. J. Geotech. Eng. 118 11 (1992) 1837-1852
7. Ho V.S. The lasagna technology for in situ soil remediation I: small field test. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 7 (1999) 1086-1091
8. Weng C.H., Yuan C., and Tu H.H. Removal of trichloroethylene from clay soil by series-electrokinetic process. Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manage. 7 1 (2003) 25-30
9. Coletta T.F., Bruell C.F., Ryan D.K., and Inyang H.I.J. Cation-enhance removal of lead from kaolinite by electrokinetics. Environ. Eng. 123 12 (1997) 1227-1233
10. Sah J.G., and Lin L.Y. Electrokinetic study on copper contaminated soils. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Pt. A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. A35 7 (2000) 1117-1139
11. Haran B.S., Popov B.N., Zheng G., and White R.E. Development of a new electrokinetic technique for decontamination of hexavalent chromium from low surface charged soils. Environ. Prog. 15 3 (1996) 166-172
12. Bala S.H., Popov B.N., Zheng G., and White R.E. Mathematical modeling of hexavalent chromium decontamination from low surface charged soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 55 (1997) 295-304
13. Reddy K.R., Xu C.Y., and Chinthamreddy S. Assessment of electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from soils by sequential extraction analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. B84 (2001) 279-296
14. Reddy K.R., and Chinthamreddy S. Effects of initial form of chromium on electrokinetic remediation in clays. Adv. Environ. Res. 7 (2003) 353-365
15. Sanjay K., Arora A., Shekhar R., and Das P.P. Electroremediation of Cr(VI) contaminated soils: kinetics and energy efficiency. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. 222 (2003) 253-259
16. Weng C.H., and Huang C.P. Preliminary study on treatment of soil enriched in chromite ore processing residue by electrokinetics. Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manage. 8 2 (2004) 67-72
17. Sawada A., Mori K., Tanaka S., Fukushima M., and Tatsumi K. Removal of Cr(VI) from contaminated soil by electrokinetic remediation. Waste Manage. 24 5 (2004) 483-490
18. Gent S.B., Bricka R.M., Alshawabkeh A.N., Larson S.L., Fabian G., and Granade S. Bench- and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 110 (2004) 53-62
19. Weng C.H., Lin T.Y., Chu S.H., and Yuan C. Laboratory-scale evaluation of Cr(VI) removal from clay by electrokinetics incorporated with Fe(O) barrier. Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic. Radioact. Waste. Manage. 10 3 (2006) 171-178
20. Chang J.H., and Cheng S.F. The remediation performance of a specific electrokinetics integrated with zero-valent metals for perchlorethylene contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. B131 (2006) 153-162
21. Blowes D.W., Ptacek C.J., and Jambor J.L. In-situ remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater using permeable reactive walls: laboratory studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31 12 (1997) 3348-3357
22. Blowes D.W., Ptacek C.J., Benner S.G., McRae C.W.T., Bennett T.A., and Puls R.W. Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. J. Contam. Hydrol. 45 (2000) 123-137
23. Puls R.W., Paul C.J., and Powell R.M. The application of in situ permeable reactive (zero-valent iron) barrier technology for the remediation of chromate-contaminated groundwater: a field test. Appl. Geochem. 14 8 (1999) 989-1000
24. Morrison S.J., Metzler D.R., and Carpenter C.E. Uranium precipitation in a permeable reactive barrier by progressive irreversible dissolution of zerovalent iron. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 2 (2001) 385-390
25. Philips D.H., Watson D.B., Roh Y., and Gu B. Mineralogical characteristics and transformations during long-term operation of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier. J. Environ. Qual. 32 (2003) 2033-2045
26. Kamolpornwijit W., Liang L., Moline G.R., Hart T., and West O.R. Identification and quantification of mineral precipitation in Fe0 fillings from a column study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 21 (2004) 5757-5765
27. Wilkin R.T., Su C., Ford R.G., and Paul C.J. Chromium removal processes during groundwater remediation by a zero valent iron permeable reactive barrier. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 12 (2005) 4599-4605
28. Powell R.M., Blowe D.W., Fillham R.W., Schultz D., Divavec T., Puls R.W., Vogan J.L., Powell P.D., and Landis R. Permeable reactive barrier technologies for contaminant remediation (1998) U.S.EPAEPA/600/R-98/125
29. 6+ from groundwater using zero valence iron in the laboratory. Chem. Spec. Bioavail. 14 (2003) 75-77
30. Acar Y.B., and Alshawabkeh A.N. Electrokinetic remediation.I: pilot-scale tests with lead-spiked kaolinite. J. Geotech. Eng. 122 3 (1996) 173-185
31. Sposito G. Chemistry of Soils (1989), Oxford University Press, New York
32. Weng C.H., Huang C.P., Allen H.E., Leavins P., and Sanders P.F. Chemical interactions between Cr(VI) and hydrous concrete particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 2 (1996) 371-376
33. He T.Y., Chen C.C., and Traina S.J. Inhibited Cr(VI) reduction by aqueous Fe(II) under hyperalkaline conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 21 (2004) 5535-5539
34. Weng C.H., and Yuan C. Removal of Cr(III) from clay soils by electrokinetics. Environ. Geochem. Health 23 3 (2001) 281-285