Active internalism and open dynamical systems

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-24

  Yoshimi, Jeff ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Active Externalism; Dynamical Systems Theory; Embodied Cognition; Internalism; Supervenience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855436246     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: 1465394X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2011.569919     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adams, F and Aizawa, K. 2001. The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14: 43-64.
2. Adams, F and Aizawa, K. 2008. The bounds of cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Aizawa, K. 2007. Understanding the embodiment of perception. Journal of Philosophy, 104: 5-25.
4. Ashby, WR. 1960. Design for a brain, London: Chapman and Hall.
5. Atmanspracher, H and beim Graben, P. 2007. Contextual emergence of mental states from neurodynamics. Chaos and Complexity Letters, 2: 151-168.
6. Bartlett, G. 2008. Whither internalism? How internalists should respond to the extended mind hypothesis. Metaphilosophy, 39: 163-184.
7. Bechtel, W. (forthcoming). The downs and ups of mechanistic research: Circadian rhythm research as an exemplar. Erkenntnis
8. Beer, R. 2000. Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4: 91-99.
9. Beer, R. 2003. The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11: 209-243.
10. beim Graben, P., & Potthast, R. (2009, March 31). Inverse problems in dynamic cognitive modeling. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 19. Retrieved, July 20, 2010, from http://chaos.aip.org/resource/1/chaoeh/v19/i1/p015103_s1?isAuthorized=no
11. Bingham, G. 1988. Task-specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck. Human Movement Science, 7: 225-264.
12. Casey, M. 1996. The dynamics of discrete-time computation, with application to recurrent neural networks and finite state machine extraction. Neural computation, 8: 1135-1178.
13. Chemero, A. 2009. Radical embodied cognitive science, Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.
14. Chiel, H and Beer, R. 1997. The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body, and environment. Trends in Neuroscience, 20: 553-557.
15. Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Clark, A. 2009. Spreading the joy? Why the machinery of consciousness is (probably) still in the head. Mind, 118: 963-993.
17. Clark, A and Chalmers, D. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis, 53: 7-19.
18. Cosmelli, D., & Thomson, E. (forthcoming). Embodiment or envatment? Reflections on the bodily basis of consciousness. In J. Stewart, G. Olivier, & E. di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Crisafi, A and Gallagher, S. 2010. Hegel and the extended mind. AI & Society, 25: 123-129.
20. Dale, R, Dietrich, E and Chemero, A. 2009. Explanatory pluralism in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 33: 739-742.
21. Dale, R and Spivey, M. 2005. From apples and oranges to symbolic dynamics: A framework for conciliating notions of cognitive representation. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 17: 317-342.
22. Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Gibbs, R. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Gibson, J. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception, New York: Taylor and Francis.
25. Gross, C. 1988. Galen and the squealing pig. The Neuroscientist, 4: 216-221.
26. Grush, R. 2003. In defense of some "Cartesian" assumptions concerning the brain and its operation. Biology and Philosophy, 18: 53-93.
27. Harvey, I, Husbands, P, Cliff, D, Thompson, A and Jakobi, N. 1997. Evolutionary robotics: The Sussex approach. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20: 205-224.
28. Harvey, I, Di Paolo, E, Wood, R, Quinn, R and Tuci., E. 2005. Evolutionary robotics: A new scientific tool for studying cognition. Artificial Life, 11: 79-98.
29. Haugeland, J. 1996. Mind embodied and embedded. In his Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
30. Hotton, S and Yoshimi, J. 2010. The dynamics of embodied cognition. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 20: 1-30.
31. Hotton, S., & Yoshimi, J. (forthcoming). Extending dynamical systems theory to model embodied cognition. Cognitive Science
32. Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Izquierdo, E, Harvey, I and Beer, RD. 2008. Associative learning on a continuum in evolved dynamical neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 16: 361-384.
34. Kelso, JA. 2001. Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Kirsh, D and Maglio, P. 1994. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18: 513-549.
36. Kirsh, D. 2010. Thinking with external representations. AI & Society, 25: 441-454.
37. Kiverstein, J and Clark, A. 2009. Introduction: Mind embodied, embedded, enacted: One church or many?. Topoi, 28: 1-7.
38. Maglio, P, Matlock, T, Raphaely, D, Chernicky, B and Kirsh, D. 1999. "Interactive skill in Scrabble". In Proceedings of twenty-first annual conference of the cognitive science society, Edited by: Hahn, M. and Stoness, S. C. 326-330. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Marder, E and Bucher, D. 2001. Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements. Current Biology, 11: 986-996.
40. Marocco, D, Cangelosi, A and Nolfi, S. 2003. The emergence of communication in evolutionary robots. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361: 2397-2421.
41. McClelland, JL, Botvinick, MM, Noelle, DC, Plaut, DC, Rogers, TTSeidenberg, MS. 2010. Letting structure emerge: Connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14: 348-356.
42. McLaughlin, B., & Bennett, K. (2005, July 25). Supervenience. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved October 21, 2010, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/
43. Menary, R. 2006. Attacking the bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 19: 329-344.
44. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1945.)
45. Noë, A. 2004. Action in perception, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Phattanasri, P, Chiel, HJ and Beer, RD. 2007. The dynamics of associative learning in evolved model circuits. Adaptive Behavior, 15: 377-396.
47. Rumelhart, DE, McClelland, JL, Smolensky, P and Hinton, GE. 1986. "Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models". In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2, Psychological and biological models, Edited by: Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. 7-58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Rupert, R. 2004. Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101: 389-428.
49. Rupert, R. 2009. Cognitive systems and the extended mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Rupert, RD. 2010. Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems. Cognitive Systems Research, 4: 343-356.
51. Simon, HA. 1996. The sciences of the artificial, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Slocum, AC, Downey, DC and Beer, RD. 2000. Further experiments in the evolution of minimally cognitive behavior: From perceiving affordances to selective attention. From Animals to Animats, 6: 430-439.
53. Spivey, MJ and Anderson, SE. 2008. On a compatibility between emergentism and reductionism. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 20: 239-245.
54. Sutton, E. 2006. Introduction: Memory, embodied cognition, and the extended mind. Philosophical Psychology, 19: 281-289.
55. Sutton, E. 2010. "Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process". In The extended mind, Edited by: Menary, R. 189-226. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Thompson, E and Varela, FJ. 2001. Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5: 418-425.
57. van Gelder, T. 1998. The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21: 615-665.
58. Warren, W. 2006. The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113: 358-389.
59. Wheeler (2010). In defense of extended functionalism. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 245-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
60. Wilson, R. 2001. Two views of realization. Philosophical Studies, 104: 1-30.
61. Wilson, R. 2010a. "Extended vision". In Perception, action and consciousness, Edited by: Gangopadhyay, N., Madary, M. and Spicer, F. 277-290. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Wilson, R. 2010b. "Meaning making and the mind of the externalist". In The extended mind, Edited by: Menary, R. 167-188. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Wilson, R and Clark, A. 2009. "How to situate cognition: Letting nature take its course". In The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, Edited by: Aydede, M. and Robbins, P. 55-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Yoshimi, J. (forthcoming). Supervenience, dynamical systems theory, and non-reductive physicalism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.