Does ultra-pulse CO 2 laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?

Lasers in Medical Science

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 567-574

  Ahrari, Farzaneh ^a   Heravi, Farzin ^a   Fekrazad, Reza ^b   Farzanegan, Fahimeh ^a   Nakhaei, Samaneh ^c  

^a MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Ceramic bracket; CO 2 laser; Debonding; Enamel crack; Enamel damage; Enamel fracture; Intrapulpal temperature

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE REMNANT INDEX; ARTICLE; BRACKET FRACTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE LASER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL DEBONDING; ENAMEL; ENAMEL CRACK; ENAMEL DAMAGE; ENAMEL FRACTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAPULPAL TEMPERATURE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPERATURE; TOOTH PULP;

CERAMICS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LASER THERAPY, LOW-LEVEL; LASERS, GAS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RISK FACTORS; TEMPERATURE; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 84855434871     PISSN: 02688921     EISSN: 1435604X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-011-0933-y     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Artun J (1997) A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded ceramic brackets in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 19(2):219-228 (Pubitemid 127493956)
2. Bishara SE, Ostby AW, Laffoon J, Warren JJ (2008) Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro. Angle Orthod 78(6):1078-1083. doi:10.2319/112007-540.1
3. Joseph VP, Rossouw E (1990) The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97(2):121-125
4. Winchester LJ (1991) Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 13(4):293-305
5. Bishara SE (2000) Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117(5):595-597
6. Ozcan M, Finnema K, Ybema A (2008) Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization. Eur J Orthod 30(2):176-182. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm100
7. Strobl K, Bahns TL, Willham L, Bishara SE, Stwalley WC (1992) Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101(2):152-158
8. Dovgan JS, Walton RE, Bishara SE (1995) Electrothermal debracketing: patient acceptance and effects on the dental pulp. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108(3):249-255
9. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Stein H, Miethke RR, Nakata M (1992) Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102(5):410-417
10. Ma T, Marangoni R, Flint W (1997) In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111(2):203-210
11. Oztoprak MO, Nalbantgil D, Erdem AS, Tozlu M, Arun T (2010) Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138(2):195-200. doi:10.1016/j. ajodo.2009.06.024
12. Tehranchi A, Fekrazad R, Zafar M, Eslami B, Kalhori KA, Gutknecht N (2010) Evaluation of the effects of CO(2) laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets vs. The conventional method. Lasers Med Sci. doi:10.1007/s10103-010-0820-y
13. Tocchio RM, Williams PT, Mayer FJ, Standing KG (1993) Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103(2):155-162
14. Hayakawa K (2005) Nd:YAG laser for debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (5):638-647. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo. 2005.03.018 (Pubitemid 41616351)
15. Nalbantgil D, Oztoprak MO, Tozlu M, Arun T (2010) Effects of different application durations of ER:YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change during debonding. Lasers Med Sci. doi:10.1007/s10103-010-0796-7
16. Iijima M, Yasuda Y, Muguruma T, Mizoguchi I (2010) Effects of CO(2) laser debonding of a ceramic bracket on the mechanical properties of enamel. Angle Orthod 80(6):1029-1035. doi:10.2319/041210-204.1
17. 2 laser for bracket bonding and debonding. Eur J Orthod 21(2):193-198
18. Azzeh E, Feldon PJ (2003) Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (1):79-83. doi:10.1067/mod.2003.2 (Pubitemid 36886612)
19. Kitahara-Ceia FM, Mucha JN, Marques dos Santos PA (2008) Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134(4):548-555. doi:10.1016/j. ajodo.2006.08.022
20. Shahabi M, Heravi F, Mokhber N, Karamad R, Bishara SE (2010) Effects on shear bond strength and the enamel surface with an enamel bonding agent. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137(3):375-378. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo. 2008.03.030
21. Zachrisson BU, Skogan O, Hoymyhr S (1980) Enamel cracks in debonded, debanded, and orthodontically untreated teeth. Am J Orthod 77(3):307-319 (Pubitemid 10067438)
22. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG (1994) A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 21(1):33-43
23. Artun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 85(4):333-340
24. 2 laser and steel knife incision. Lasers Surg Med 8(6):596-599 (Pubitemid 19013099)
25. Vukovich ME, Wood DP, Daley TD (1991) Heat generated by grinding during removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 99(6):505-512
26. Chen HY, Su MZ, Chang HF, Chen YJ, Lan WH, Lin CP (2007) Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132(5):680-686. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.035
27. Bishara SE, Trulove TS (1990) Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98(3):263-273
28. Viazis AD, Cavanaugh G, Bevis RR (1990) Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98(3):214-221
29. Forsberg CM, Hagberg C (1992) Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention. Br J Orthod 19 (3):183-189
30. Liu JK, Chung CH, Chang CY, Shieh DB (2005) Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128(6):761-765. doi:10.1016/j. ajodo.2004.03.041, quiz 802
31. Wang WN, Meng CL, Tarng TH (1997) Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111(4):374-381
32. Heravi F, Rashed R, Raziee L (2008) The effects of bracket removal on enamel. Aust Orthod J 24(2):110-115
33. Eliades T, Viazis AD, Lekka M (1993) Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104(1):21-26
34. Zach L, Cohen G (1965) Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 19:515-530